A Management Algorithm for High-Grade Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Timothy J Morley, Jeremy Fridling, Jennifer M Brewer, Ronald Gross, Stephanie Montgomery, Corrine Miller, Sarah Posillico, Elan Jeremitsky, Vijay Jayaraman, Kurt E Roberts, Thomas Russell Hill, Manuel Moutinho, Andrew R Doben, Chasen J Greig
{"title":"A Management Algorithm for High-Grade Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Patients.","authors":"Timothy J Morley, Jeremy Fridling, Jennifer M Brewer, Ronald Gross, Stephanie Montgomery, Corrine Miller, Sarah Posillico, Elan Jeremitsky, Vijay Jayaraman, Kurt E Roberts, Thomas Russell Hill, Manuel Moutinho, Andrew R Doben, Chasen J Greig","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute cholecystitis (AC) is among the most frequently encountered surgical problems. Current management typically includes laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Suboptimal outcomes of LC can include bile duct injury, open conversion (OC), and/or subtotal cholecystectomy (SC). Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) drainage with interval cholecystectomy has emerged as an alternative in high-risk patients but outcomes vary widely. We describe an evidence-based algorithm for managing AC in high-risk patients via PCT followed by minimally invasive cholecystectomy (MIS-C). We hypothesized that our algorithm would prove safe, effective, and decrease OC and SC rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing PCT and MIS-C according to our algorithm from January 2020 to June 2023. The primary outcome was OC or SC. Secondary outcomes included bile leak, bile duct injury, and perioperative complications. Demographic, clinical, and operative data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients met criteria and were treated according to our algorithm during the study period. One patient (3.4%) required conversion to SC. Other complications included 3 postoperative bile leaks (10.4%). There were no bile duct injuries and no deaths. None were lost to follow up. When stratified by LC or robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC), complications occurred more frequently in the LC group, including the lone conversion to SC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our management protocol of high-grade AC in high-risk patients appears safe, feasible, and may reduce adverse events. Additionally, our data suggest a potential benefit of RC in this setting which may be an underutilized tool in acute care surgery. Prospective data are needed to validate and further refine this algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11935645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is among the most frequently encountered surgical problems. Current management typically includes laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Suboptimal outcomes of LC can include bile duct injury, open conversion (OC), and/or subtotal cholecystectomy (SC). Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) drainage with interval cholecystectomy has emerged as an alternative in high-risk patients but outcomes vary widely. We describe an evidence-based algorithm for managing AC in high-risk patients via PCT followed by minimally invasive cholecystectomy (MIS-C). We hypothesized that our algorithm would prove safe, effective, and decrease OC and SC rates.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing PCT and MIS-C according to our algorithm from January 2020 to June 2023. The primary outcome was OC or SC. Secondary outcomes included bile leak, bile duct injury, and perioperative complications. Demographic, clinical, and operative data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab Software.

Results: Twenty-nine patients met criteria and were treated according to our algorithm during the study period. One patient (3.4%) required conversion to SC. Other complications included 3 postoperative bile leaks (10.4%). There were no bile duct injuries and no deaths. None were lost to follow up. When stratified by LC or robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC), complications occurred more frequently in the LC group, including the lone conversion to SC.

Conclusion: Our management protocol of high-grade AC in high-risk patients appears safe, feasible, and may reduce adverse events. Additionally, our data suggest a potential benefit of RC in this setting which may be an underutilized tool in acute care surgery. Prospective data are needed to validate and further refine this algorithm.

高危患者高级别急性胆囊炎的管理算法。
背景:急性胆囊炎(AC)是最常见的外科问题之一。目前的治疗通常包括腹腔镜胆囊切除术。LC的次优结果可能包括胆管损伤、开腹转换(OC)和/或胆囊次全切除术(SC)。经皮胆囊造瘘管(PCT)引流与间歇胆囊切除术已成为高危患者的一种选择,但结果差异很大。我们描述了一种基于证据的算法,通过PCT和微创胆囊切除术(MIS-C)来管理高危患者的AC。我们假设我们的算法被证明是安全、有效的,并且可以降低OC和SC的发生率。方法:回顾性回顾2020年1月至2023年6月根据我们的算法接受PCT和MIS-C的患者的图表。主要结局为胆漏或胆管损伤,次要结局包括胆漏、胆管损伤和围手术期并发症。收集了人口学、临床和手术资料。采用Minitab软件进行统计分析。结果:29例患者在研究期间符合标准并按照我们的算法进行治疗。1例(3.4%)患者需要转SC。其他并发症包括3例术后胆汁漏(10.4%)。无胆管损伤,无死亡病例。没有人丢失。当采用LC或机器人辅助胆囊切除术(RC)分层时,LC组的并发症发生率更高,包括单独转化为sc。结论:我们的高危患者高级别AC的管理方案是安全可行的,并且可以减少不良事件。此外,我们的数据表明,在这种情况下,RC可能是一种未充分利用的急性护理手术工具,具有潜在的好处。需要前瞻性的数据来验证和进一步完善该算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信