Real Versus Sham-Based Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Abstract

Background/Objective: To assess the effectiveness of therapy based on sliding and tensioning neurodynamic techniques in the conservative treatment of mild and moderate forms of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) compared to sham therapy. Methods: A single-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial. The study was conducted at several medical clinics. Individuals diagnosed with CuTS (initially 136 subjects, of whom 91 completed the full protocol) participated in the experiment. In the experimental group (MT), sliding and tensioning neurodynamic techniques were applied, whereas in the control group (ST), a sham therapy was used, involving the performance of neurodynamic techniques in an intermediate position without following the specific neurodynamic sequence for the ulnar nerve. The therapy was administered five times per week over the course of 10 sessions. All participants underwent assessments, including nerve conduction studies, ultrasound imaging (cross-sectional area and shear modulus), pain levels, two-point discrimination sensation, cutaneous sensory perception threshold, symptoms, ability to perform certain activities, and changes in improvement following treatment. Results: A baseline assessment revealed no significant inter-group differences in all examined parameters (p > 0.05). After therapy, there was a statistically significant intra-group improvement in all parameters tested (p < 0.01). In the MT group, the intra-group differences were significant across all parameters tested (p < 0.01). However, in the ST group (sham therapy), only the shear modulus showed statistically significant changes, while the other tested parameters remained unchanged. Conclusions: Neurodynamic techniques demonstrate superior therapeutic effects compared to sham therapy in the treatment of mild to moderate forms of CuTS.