Cardiorespiratory Effects of Inverse Ratio Ventilation in Obese Patients During Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Michele Carron, Enrico Tamburini, Alessandra Maggiolo, Federico Linassi, Nicolò Sella, Paolo Navalesi
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory Effects of Inverse Ratio Ventilation in Obese Patients During Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Michele Carron, Enrico Tamburini, Alessandra Maggiolo, Federico Linassi, Nicolò Sella, Paolo Navalesi","doi":"10.3390/jcm14062063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Managing ventilatory strategies in patients with obesity under general anesthesia presents significant challenges due to obesity-related pathophysiological changes. Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) has emerged as a potential strategy to optimize respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery in this population. The primary outcomes were changes in respiratory mechanics, including peak inspiratory pressure (P<sub>Peak</sub>), plateau pressure (P<sub>Plat</sub>), mean airway pressure (P<sub>Mean</sub>), and dynamic compliance (C<sub>Dyn</sub>). Secondary outcomes included gas exchange parameters, hemodynamic measures, inflammatory cytokines, and postoperative complications. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, searching PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and PMC Central. Only English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of IRV in adult surgical patients with obesity were included. The quality and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, respectively. <b>Results:</b> Three RCTs including 172 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to conventional ventilation without prolonged inspiratory time or IRV, IRV significantly reduced P<sub>Peak</sub> (MD [95%CI]: -3.15 [-3.88; -2.42] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and P<sub>Plat</sub> (MD [95%CI]: -3.13 [-3.80; -2.47] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>p</i> < 0.001) while increasing P<sub>Mean</sub> (MD [95%CI]: 4.17 [3.11; 5.24] cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and C<sub>Dyn</sub> (MD [95%CI]: 2.64 [0.95; 4.22] mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O, <i>p</i> = 0.002) during laparoscopy, without significantly affecting gas exchange. IRV significantly reduced mean arterial pressure (MD [95%CI]: -2.93 [-3.95; -1.91] mmHg, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and TNF-α levels (MD [95%CI]: -9.65 [-17.89; -1.40] pg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.021). <b>Conclusions:</b> IRV optimizes intraoperative respiratory mechanics but has no significant impact on postoperative outcomes, necessitating further research to determine its clinical role.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Managing ventilatory strategies in patients with obesity under general anesthesia presents significant challenges due to obesity-related pathophysiological changes. Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) has emerged as a potential strategy to optimize respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery in this population. The primary outcomes were changes in respiratory mechanics, including peak inspiratory pressure (PPeak), plateau pressure (PPlat), mean airway pressure (PMean), and dynamic compliance (CDyn). Secondary outcomes included gas exchange parameters, hemodynamic measures, inflammatory cytokines, and postoperative complications. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, searching PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and PMC Central. Only English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of IRV in adult surgical patients with obesity were included. The quality and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, respectively. Results: Three RCTs including 172 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to conventional ventilation without prolonged inspiratory time or IRV, IRV significantly reduced PPeak (MD [95%CI]: -3.15 [-3.88; -2.42] cmH2O, p < 0.001) and PPlat (MD [95%CI]: -3.13 [-3.80; -2.47] cmH2O, p < 0.001) while increasing PMean (MD [95%CI]: 4.17 [3.11; 5.24] cmH2O, p < 0.001) and CDyn (MD [95%CI]: 2.64 [0.95; 4.22] mL/cmH2O, p = 0.002) during laparoscopy, without significantly affecting gas exchange. IRV significantly reduced mean arterial pressure (MD [95%CI]: -2.93 [-3.95; -1.91] mmHg, p < 0.001) and TNF-α levels (MD [95%CI]: -9.65 [-17.89; -1.40] pg/mL, p = 0.021). Conclusions: IRV optimizes intraoperative respiratory mechanics but has no significant impact on postoperative outcomes, necessitating further research to determine its clinical role.

腹腔镜手术中肥胖患者反比通气对心肺的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景/目的:由于肥胖相关的病理生理变化,全麻下肥胖患者的通气策略管理面临重大挑战。逆比通气(IRV)已成为优化该人群腹腔镜手术期间呼吸力学的潜在策略。主要结局是呼吸力学的变化,包括吸气峰值压力(PPeak)、平台压力(PPlat)、平均气道压力(PMean)和动态顺应性(CDyn)。次要结局包括气体交换参数、血流动力学指标、炎症因子和术后并发症。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE和PMC Central,进行系统回顾和meta分析。仅纳入英语随机对照试验(RCTs),评估IRV对成年肥胖手术患者的影响。分别使用风险偏倚2 (RoB 2)工具和推荐、评估、发展和评价等级(GRADE)框架评估证据的质量和确定性。结果:3项rct包括172例患者符合纳入标准。与不延长吸气时间的常规通气或IRV相比,IRV显著降低PPeak (MD [95%CI]: -3.15 [-3.88;-2.42] cmH2O, p < 0.001)和PPlat (MD [95%CI]: -3.13 [-3.80;-2.47] cmH2O, p < 0.001),而PMean升高(MD [95%CI]: 4.17 [3.11;5.24] cmH2O, p < 0.001)和CDyn (MD [95%CI]: 2.64 [0.95;4.22] mL/cmH2O, p = 0.002),对气体交换无显著影响。IRV显著降低平均动脉压(MD [95%CI]: -2.93 [-3.95;-1.91] mmHg, p < 0.001)和TNF-α水平(MD [95%CI]: -9.65 [-17.89;-1.40] pg/mL, p = 0.021)。结论:IRV可优化术中呼吸力学,但对术后预后无明显影响,其临床作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信