A Retrospective Review of the Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tzonghuei Chen, Leslie Annette Vargas Galvan, Kendra L Walsh, Andrew Winegarner, Patricia Apruzzese, Shyamal Asher, Andrew Maslow
{"title":"A Retrospective Review of the Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.","authors":"Tzonghuei Chen, Leslie Annette Vargas Galvan, Kendra L Walsh, Andrew Winegarner, Patricia Apruzzese, Shyamal Asher, Andrew Maslow","doi":"10.3390/jcm14062074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Regional anesthesia is an important part of Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) protocols designed to enhance analgesia, reduce opioid use, and improve postoperative outcomes. The deep parasternal intercostal plane (Deep-PIP) block is a fascial plane block in which local anesthetics are injected between the intercostal and transversus thoracis muscles to block neural transmission through the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerve. This study evaluates the impact of the Deep-PIP block in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into cohorts of 232 patients who had a block (BLOCK group) and 351 patients who did not receive a block (NOBlock group) using propensity score matching. Pain scores and opioid consumption over 24 h, extubation times, and ICU and hospital length of stay were compared for the two groups. Several subgroup analyses were also performed to evaluate the effects of block technique and block adjuvants. <b>Results</b>: While there was not a statistically significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups, the BLOCK group had significantly lower pain scores, extubation times, and hospital length of stay. The subgroup analyses showed that modifications to block technique and use of block adjuvants were associated with reduced opioid consumption, but did not significantly affect pain scores, extubation time, or ICU or hospital length of stay. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrates the benefits of the deep parasternal intercostal plane block as part of an ERACS protocol. Routine implementation of the Deep-PIP block is reasonable given its potential benefits combined with its positive safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Regional anesthesia is an important part of Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) protocols designed to enhance analgesia, reduce opioid use, and improve postoperative outcomes. The deep parasternal intercostal plane (Deep-PIP) block is a fascial plane block in which local anesthetics are injected between the intercostal and transversus thoracis muscles to block neural transmission through the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerve. This study evaluates the impact of the Deep-PIP block in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into cohorts of 232 patients who had a block (BLOCK group) and 351 patients who did not receive a block (NOBlock group) using propensity score matching. Pain scores and opioid consumption over 24 h, extubation times, and ICU and hospital length of stay were compared for the two groups. Several subgroup analyses were also performed to evaluate the effects of block technique and block adjuvants. Results: While there was not a statistically significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups, the BLOCK group had significantly lower pain scores, extubation times, and hospital length of stay. The subgroup analyses showed that modifications to block technique and use of block adjuvants were associated with reduced opioid consumption, but did not significantly affect pain scores, extubation time, or ICU or hospital length of stay. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the benefits of the deep parasternal intercostal plane block as part of an ERACS protocol. Routine implementation of the Deep-PIP block is reasonable given its potential benefits combined with its positive safety profile.

胸骨正中切开术心脏手术患者胸骨旁深肋间平面阻滞的回顾性分析。
背景/目的:区域麻醉是心脏手术后增强恢复(ERACS)方案的重要组成部分,旨在增强镇痛,减少阿片类药物的使用,改善术后预后。深胸骨旁肋间面阻滞(deep - pip)是一种筋膜面阻滞,在肋间肌和胸横肌之间注射局部麻醉剂,以阻断神经通过肋间神经前皮支的传递。本研究评估Deep-PIP阻滞对经胸骨正中切开术的心脏手术患者的影响。方法:在本回顾性队列研究中,采用倾向评分匹配将患者分为232例阻滞组(block组)和351例未接受阻滞组(NOBlock组)。比较两组患者疼痛评分、24 h内阿片类药物消耗、拔管次数、ICU和住院时间。还进行了几个亚组分析,以评估阻断技术和阻断佐剂的效果。结果:虽然两组之间阿片类药物消耗无统计学差异,但BLOCK组的疼痛评分、拔管次数和住院时间明显较低。亚组分析显示,阻断技术的改进和阻断佐剂的使用与阿片类药物消耗的减少有关,但对疼痛评分、拔管时间、ICU或住院时间没有显著影响。结论:本研究证明了深胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞作为ERACS方案的一部分的好处。鉴于其潜在的好处和积极的安全性,常规实施Deep-PIP区块是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信