Mapping Psychological Well-Being in Morbid Obesity: A Network Analysis Approach.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Giada Pietrabissa, Anna Guerrini-Usubini, Valentina Villa, Alessandro Sartorio, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Amelia Brunani
{"title":"Mapping Psychological Well-Being in Morbid Obesity: A Network Analysis Approach.","authors":"Giada Pietrabissa, Anna Guerrini-Usubini, Valentina Villa, Alessandro Sartorio, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Amelia Brunani","doi":"10.3390/jcm14062076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Identifying key psychological well-being factors in morbid obesity is crucial for designing effective mental health and weight management interventions. This study explores the interconnections between the dimensions of psychological well-being in a large sample of adults with morbid obesity enrolled in an inpatient nutritional rehabilitation program. <b>Methods</b>: A sample of 3212 participants (F = 58%; mean age = 57.18 years; mean Body Mass Index = 43.40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) completed the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) upon admission to the clinic. A network analysis approach examined the relationships among the PGWBI dimensions (anxiety, depression, positive well-being, self-control, vitality, and general health). <b>Results</b>: Network analysis revealed that vitality and positive well-being exhibited the highest values across closeness (1.432; 0.353), strength (0.853; 0.917), and expected influence (0.853; 0917), indicating their key role in psychological well-being. Depression also demonstrated moderate relevance, suggesting its connection to other well-being factors, though it was not the primary determinant. In contrast, self-control and general health had negative strength and expected influence values (-0.660; -1.641), indicating a less central role in the network. Additionally, anxiety and depression displayed negative betweenness (-0.645), reinforcing their more peripheral position. Conversely, positive well-being and vitality showed the highest betweenness (1.291), highlighting their role as key connecting nodes within the well-being network. <b>Conclusions</b>: Findings suggest interventions targeting positive well-being and vitality may most effectively enhance psychological well-being in morbid obesity, emphasizing strength-based approaches that foster positive affect, motivation, and resilience rather than focusing solely on reducing distress or weight-related concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Identifying key psychological well-being factors in morbid obesity is crucial for designing effective mental health and weight management interventions. This study explores the interconnections between the dimensions of psychological well-being in a large sample of adults with morbid obesity enrolled in an inpatient nutritional rehabilitation program. Methods: A sample of 3212 participants (F = 58%; mean age = 57.18 years; mean Body Mass Index = 43.40 kg/m2) completed the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) upon admission to the clinic. A network analysis approach examined the relationships among the PGWBI dimensions (anxiety, depression, positive well-being, self-control, vitality, and general health). Results: Network analysis revealed that vitality and positive well-being exhibited the highest values across closeness (1.432; 0.353), strength (0.853; 0.917), and expected influence (0.853; 0917), indicating their key role in psychological well-being. Depression also demonstrated moderate relevance, suggesting its connection to other well-being factors, though it was not the primary determinant. In contrast, self-control and general health had negative strength and expected influence values (-0.660; -1.641), indicating a less central role in the network. Additionally, anxiety and depression displayed negative betweenness (-0.645), reinforcing their more peripheral position. Conversely, positive well-being and vitality showed the highest betweenness (1.291), highlighting their role as key connecting nodes within the well-being network. Conclusions: Findings suggest interventions targeting positive well-being and vitality may most effectively enhance psychological well-being in morbid obesity, emphasizing strength-based approaches that foster positive affect, motivation, and resilience rather than focusing solely on reducing distress or weight-related concerns.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信