Comparative Analysis of Temperature Variations Following Sympathetic Blocks in Warm and Cold Subtypes of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Burcu Candan, Semih Gungor
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Temperature Variations Following Sympathetic Blocks in Warm and Cold Subtypes of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Burcu Candan, Semih Gungor","doi":"10.3390/jcm14062060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The pathophysiological mechanisms of temperature asymmetry differ between patients with warm and cold subtypes of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Consequently, the response to lumbar sympathetic blocks (LSBs) and the resulting temperature improvement may vary between these two subtypes. We aimed to evaluate whether there was a significant difference in temperature elevation following sympathetic blocks in warm versus cold subtypes of CRPS. <b>Methods</b>: We calculated the temperature difference by analyzing forward-looking infrared (FLIR) thermal camera images of the affected extremity at pre-block and 5-min post-block time points. The primary outcome measure was that the mean temperature increase following LSB would be higher in the cold CRPS group than in the warm CRPS group. The secondary outcome measure was that the mean temperature elevation following the sympathetic block in the cold CRPS subtype would be at least 50% higher than in the warm CRPS subtype. <b>Results</b>: The study assessed warm and cold CRPS subtypes by analyzing temperature profiles from 90 lumbar sympathetic blocks performed on 34 patients. The temperature change in the affected extremity following LSB varied widely, with the highest increase observed in one patient at 10.99 °C. The cold CRPS patients demonstrated a higher mean temperature increase at the 5 min time point following LSB, averaging 3.37 °C in initial cases and 2.67 °C across all cases. In comparison, warm CRPS patients had lower mean increases of 0.58 °C in initial cases and 1.23 °C across all cases. Notably, the mean temperature rise in the cold CRPS group exceeded that of the warm CRPS group by more than 50%, meeting the secondary outcome goal. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our results indicated that patients with the cold subtype of CRPS tend to experience greater temperature improvements compared to those with the warm subtype after undergoing a sympathetic block. Therefore, our findings suggest that the criteria for determining the success of a sympathetic block should be revised to account for the cold and warm subtypes of CRPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The pathophysiological mechanisms of temperature asymmetry differ between patients with warm and cold subtypes of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Consequently, the response to lumbar sympathetic blocks (LSBs) and the resulting temperature improvement may vary between these two subtypes. We aimed to evaluate whether there was a significant difference in temperature elevation following sympathetic blocks in warm versus cold subtypes of CRPS. Methods: We calculated the temperature difference by analyzing forward-looking infrared (FLIR) thermal camera images of the affected extremity at pre-block and 5-min post-block time points. The primary outcome measure was that the mean temperature increase following LSB would be higher in the cold CRPS group than in the warm CRPS group. The secondary outcome measure was that the mean temperature elevation following the sympathetic block in the cold CRPS subtype would be at least 50% higher than in the warm CRPS subtype. Results: The study assessed warm and cold CRPS subtypes by analyzing temperature profiles from 90 lumbar sympathetic blocks performed on 34 patients. The temperature change in the affected extremity following LSB varied widely, with the highest increase observed in one patient at 10.99 °C. The cold CRPS patients demonstrated a higher mean temperature increase at the 5 min time point following LSB, averaging 3.37 °C in initial cases and 2.67 °C across all cases. In comparison, warm CRPS patients had lower mean increases of 0.58 °C in initial cases and 1.23 °C across all cases. Notably, the mean temperature rise in the cold CRPS group exceeded that of the warm CRPS group by more than 50%, meeting the secondary outcome goal. Conclusions: Our results indicated that patients with the cold subtype of CRPS tend to experience greater temperature improvements compared to those with the warm subtype after undergoing a sympathetic block. Therefore, our findings suggest that the criteria for determining the success of a sympathetic block should be revised to account for the cold and warm subtypes of CRPS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信