Clinical Significance of Extracellular Volume of Myocardium (ECV) Assessed by Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Adrian Martuszewski, Patrycja Paluszkiewicz, Rafał Poręba, Paweł Gać
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Extracellular Volume of Myocardium (ECV) Assessed by Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Adrian Martuszewski, Patrycja Paluszkiewicz, Rafał Poręba, Paweł Gać","doi":"10.3390/jcm14062066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Extracellular volume (ECV) of the myocardium, a biomarker of interstitial space and fibrosis, plays a critical role in cardiac disease diagnosis and prognosis. Although cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for ECV assessment, computed tomography (CT) offers a viable alternative, particularly in patients with contraindications to MRI. This study aimed to assess whether CT-derived ECV is systematically elevated in cardiac diseases associated with myocardial fibrosis. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science up to January 2023 identified 364 studies, including 16 from registers and 4 from manual searches. After exclusions, 73 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 15 provided quantitative data on group sizes, mean ECV values, standard deviations, and imaging modalities (CTA, DECT, LIE-DECT) and were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using <i>Cochrane Handbook</i> formulas. Statistical analyses employed random-effects models (R version 4.4.2). <b>Results</b>: The pooled analysis showed that ECV was significantly higher in pathological groups compared to controls (SMD 1.60; 95% CI: 1.23-1.96; I<sup>2</sup> = 84.6%). Elevated ECV correlated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality in heart failure and advanced myocardial fibrosis in amyloidosis and cardiomyopathies. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that advanced CT techniques (DECT, LIE-DECT) and CTA provided comparable diagnostic accuracy. <b>Conclusions</b>: CT-derived ECV is a reliable, non-invasive marker of myocardial fibrosis, offering diagnostic and prognostic value similar to MRI. Standardizing CT protocols and conducting multicenter studies are essential to validate its broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Extracellular volume (ECV) of the myocardium, a biomarker of interstitial space and fibrosis, plays a critical role in cardiac disease diagnosis and prognosis. Although cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for ECV assessment, computed tomography (CT) offers a viable alternative, particularly in patients with contraindications to MRI. This study aimed to assess whether CT-derived ECV is systematically elevated in cardiac diseases associated with myocardial fibrosis. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science up to January 2023 identified 364 studies, including 16 from registers and 4 from manual searches. After exclusions, 73 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 15 provided quantitative data on group sizes, mean ECV values, standard deviations, and imaging modalities (CTA, DECT, LIE-DECT) and were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using Cochrane Handbook formulas. Statistical analyses employed random-effects models (R version 4.4.2). Results: The pooled analysis showed that ECV was significantly higher in pathological groups compared to controls (SMD 1.60; 95% CI: 1.23-1.96; I2 = 84.6%). Elevated ECV correlated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher mortality in heart failure and advanced myocardial fibrosis in amyloidosis and cardiomyopathies. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that advanced CT techniques (DECT, LIE-DECT) and CTA provided comparable diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: CT-derived ECV is a reliable, non-invasive marker of myocardial fibrosis, offering diagnostic and prognostic value similar to MRI. Standardizing CT protocols and conducting multicenter studies are essential to validate its broader clinical application.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信