Improved local control and survival outcomes with RADPLAT in T4 oropharyngeal cancer: a retrospective study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Satoshi Kano, Takayoshi Suzuki, Daisuke Yoshida, Nayuta Tsushima, Hiroshi Idogawa, Ryohei Katsumata, Koichi Yasuda, Naoya Kinota, Koji Yamasaki, Yasushi Shimizu, Jun Taguchi, Hidefumi Aoyama, Akihiro Homma
{"title":"Improved local control and survival outcomes with RADPLAT in T4 oropharyngeal cancer: a retrospective study.","authors":"Satoshi Kano, Takayoshi Suzuki, Daisuke Yoshida, Nayuta Tsushima, Hiroshi Idogawa, Ryohei Katsumata, Koichi Yasuda, Naoya Kinota, Koji Yamasaki, Yasushi Shimizu, Jun Taguchi, Hidefumi Aoyama, Akihiro Homma","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02751-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Standard treatments for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) include surgery and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). While surgery offers good tumor control, it often results in significant postoperative functional impairments. Conversely, intravenous chemoradiotherapy (IV-CRT) is less effective in controlling primary tumors in T4 OPC cases and offers limited options for salvage surgery after recurrence. RADPLAT, a treatment involving intra-arterial cisplatin combined with radiotherapy, has demonstrated favorable results for other cancers and may offer an alternative treatment for OPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of RADPLAT and IV-CRT in the patients with T4 OPC treated at Hokkaido University Hospital between 2003 and 2022. The primary endpoint was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six patients were included, with 29 in the RADPLAT group and 27 in the IV-CRT group. The RADPLAT group showed significantly better LRFS (2-year LRFS: 82.3%) and OS (5-year OS: 73.8%) compared to the IV-CRT group (2y-LRFS: 66.0%, 5y-OS: 45.7%). Multivariate analysis identified RADPLAT as an independent favorable prognostic factor for both LRFS and OS. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups, although grade 3 or higher mucositis was more common in the RADPLAT group. Swallowing function and tracheostomy rates were similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RADPLAT provides superior local control and survival outcomes compared to IV-CRT for T4 OPC, with comparable safety and functional preservation. These findings suggest that RADPLAT may be a promising alternative to IV-CRT for cases with T4 OPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1127-1135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02751-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Standard treatments for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) include surgery and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). While surgery offers good tumor control, it often results in significant postoperative functional impairments. Conversely, intravenous chemoradiotherapy (IV-CRT) is less effective in controlling primary tumors in T4 OPC cases and offers limited options for salvage surgery after recurrence. RADPLAT, a treatment involving intra-arterial cisplatin combined with radiotherapy, has demonstrated favorable results for other cancers and may offer an alternative treatment for OPC.

Methods: This retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of RADPLAT and IV-CRT in the patients with T4 OPC treated at Hokkaido University Hospital between 2003 and 2022. The primary endpoint was local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results: Fifty-six patients were included, with 29 in the RADPLAT group and 27 in the IV-CRT group. The RADPLAT group showed significantly better LRFS (2-year LRFS: 82.3%) and OS (5-year OS: 73.8%) compared to the IV-CRT group (2y-LRFS: 66.0%, 5y-OS: 45.7%). Multivariate analysis identified RADPLAT as an independent favorable prognostic factor for both LRFS and OS. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups, although grade 3 or higher mucositis was more common in the RADPLAT group. Swallowing function and tracheostomy rates were similar between the groups.

Conclusion: RADPLAT provides superior local control and survival outcomes compared to IV-CRT for T4 OPC, with comparable safety and functional preservation. These findings suggest that RADPLAT may be a promising alternative to IV-CRT for cases with T4 OPC.

RADPLAT改善T4口咽癌的局部控制和生存结果:一项回顾性研究。
背景:局部晚期口咽癌(OPC)的标准治疗包括手术和放化疗(CRT)。虽然手术可以很好地控制肿瘤,但它往往会导致严重的术后功能障碍。相反,静脉放化疗(IV-CRT)对T4 OPC患者的原发肿瘤控制效果较差,复发后的挽救性手术选择有限。RADPLAT是一种动脉内顺铂联合放疗的治疗方法,已经证明对其他癌症有良好的效果,可能为OPC提供一种替代治疗方法。方法:回顾性比较2003 - 2022年在北海道大学医院治疗的T4 OPC患者的RADPLAT和IV-CRT的疗效和安全性。主要终点是局部无复发生存期(LRFS),次要终点是总生存期(OS)。结果:共纳入56例患者,其中RADPLAT组29例,IV-CRT组27例。RADPLAT组的LRFS(2年LRFS: 82.3%)和OS(5年OS: 73.8%)明显优于IV-CRT组(2年LRFS: 66.0%, 5年OS: 45.7%)。多变量分析表明RADPLAT是LRFS和OS的独立有利预后因素。两组之间的不良事件发生率无显著差异,尽管3级或更高级别的粘膜炎在RADPLAT组中更为常见。两组间吞咽功能和气管造口率相似。结论:与IV-CRT相比,RADPLAT为T4 OPC提供了更好的局部控制和生存结果,具有相当的安全性和功能保存。这些发现表明,对于T4 OPC患者,RADPLAT可能是IV-CRT的一个有希望的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信