Is Immobilization Necessary After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1177/15589447251325825
Mohammad Daher, Jack C Casey, Pierre Helou, Alan H Daniels, Joseph A Gil
{"title":"Is Immobilization Necessary After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Mohammad Daher, Jack C Casey, Pierre Helou, Alan H Daniels, Joseph A Gil","doi":"10.1177/15589447251325825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fractures in adults. With the increased trend in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a volar locking plate, the postoperative rehabilitation course remains debated and whether or not a postoperative immobilization is necessary is unknown. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were queried through August 2024. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies that compared patients undergoing immediate mobilization after ORIF for DRF with patients undergoing postoperative immobilization. Adverse events, patient-reported outcomes measures, and range of motion (ROM) were all compared between the 2 groups at various postoperative time points. Four randomized controlled trials were included in this study. No difference was seen in the risk of complications (odds ratio = 1.17, <i>P</i> = .70) and reoperations (odds ratio = 1.35, <i>P</i> = .53) between the 2 groups. The immediate mobilization group had lower pain scores at 6 months (mean difference = -0.46, <i>P</i> = .005) and lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand at 3 months (mean difference = -0.45, <i>P</i> = .002), and 6 months (mean difference = -0.46, <i>P</i> = .005). As for ROM, better forearm rotation was seen in the immediate mobilization group at 6 months (mean difference = 3.43, <i>P</i> = .004).</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251325825"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251325825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fractures in adults. With the increased trend in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a volar locking plate, the postoperative rehabilitation course remains debated and whether or not a postoperative immobilization is necessary is unknown. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were queried through August 2024. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies that compared patients undergoing immediate mobilization after ORIF for DRF with patients undergoing postoperative immobilization. Adverse events, patient-reported outcomes measures, and range of motion (ROM) were all compared between the 2 groups at various postoperative time points. Four randomized controlled trials were included in this study. No difference was seen in the risk of complications (odds ratio = 1.17, P = .70) and reoperations (odds ratio = 1.35, P = .53) between the 2 groups. The immediate mobilization group had lower pain scores at 6 months (mean difference = -0.46, P = .005) and lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand at 3 months (mean difference = -0.45, P = .002), and 6 months (mean difference = -0.46, P = .005). As for ROM, better forearm rotation was seen in the immediate mobilization group at 6 months (mean difference = 3.43, P = .004).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信