Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization in combination with lenvatinib and camrelizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with inferior vena cava/right atrium tumor thrombus: a multicenter study.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Qizhen Huang, Xiaohong Zhong, Shaoxing Chen, Wenhui Liu, Jing Yang, Qingjing Chen, Tingting Yang, Fuqun Wei, Juhui Chen, Yufei Zhou, Lijuan Zhan, Xiuhui Liang, Jianji Pan, Kongying Lin, Jinsheng Hong, Yongyi Zeng
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy versus transarterial chemoembolization in combination with lenvatinib and camrelizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with inferior vena cava/right atrium tumor thrombus: a multicenter study.","authors":"Qizhen Huang, Xiaohong Zhong, Shaoxing Chen, Wenhui Liu, Jing Yang, Qingjing Chen, Tingting Yang, Fuqun Wei, Juhui Chen, Yufei Zhou, Lijuan Zhan, Xiuhui Liang, Jianji Pan, Kongying Lin, Jinsheng Hong, Yongyi Zeng","doi":"10.1007/s12072-025-10794-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with inferior vena cava/right atrium tumor thrombus (IVC/RATT) treated with lenvatinib and camrelizumab.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>HCC with IVC/RATT from four hospitals were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into RT group and TACE group. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to minimize bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). In addition, safety was assessed by treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 108 patients included in this study, 48 patients in TACE group and 60 patients in RT group. The median follow-up time was 24.8 months. After the application of sIPTW, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Before and after sITPW, the median OS and median PFS in the RT group were significantly longer than in the TACE group. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that RT was an independent prognosis factor of both OS and PFS. There was no significant difference between two groups in overall response, while IVC/RATT response rate of RT group was significantly higher than TACE group. Incidence rate of TRAEs in two groups were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In combination with lenvatinib and camrelizumab, RT significantly improves the prognosis of HCC with IVC/RATT compared to TACE, with a comparable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10794-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with inferior vena cava/right atrium tumor thrombus (IVC/RATT) treated with lenvatinib and camrelizumab.

Materials and methods: HCC with IVC/RATT from four hospitals were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into RT group and TACE group. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to minimize bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). In addition, safety was assessed by treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between the two groups.

Results: Among 108 patients included in this study, 48 patients in TACE group and 60 patients in RT group. The median follow-up time was 24.8 months. After the application of sIPTW, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Before and after sITPW, the median OS and median PFS in the RT group were significantly longer than in the TACE group. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that RT was an independent prognosis factor of both OS and PFS. There was no significant difference between two groups in overall response, while IVC/RATT response rate of RT group was significantly higher than TACE group. Incidence rate of TRAEs in two groups were similar.

Conclusions: In combination with lenvatinib and camrelizumab, RT significantly improves the prognosis of HCC with IVC/RATT compared to TACE, with a comparable safety profile.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信