The Impact of Social Norms on Diffusion Dynamics: A Simulation of E-Cigarette Use Behavior.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Education & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1177/10901981251327189
Sarah E Piombo, George G Vega Yon, Thomas W Valente
{"title":"The Impact of Social Norms on Diffusion Dynamics: A Simulation of E-Cigarette Use Behavior.","authors":"Sarah E Piombo, George G Vega Yon, Thomas W Valente","doi":"10.1177/10901981251327189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diffusion of innovations theory can be used to understand how to prevent or slow the spread of harmful behaviors, such as e-cigarette use in adolescent social networks. This study explores how different network intervention strategies could impact diffusion dynamics through network simulations based on observed social norms and e-cigarette use data. Simulations were initialized with baseline network data collected from 10 schools in a prospective cohort study of adolescent social networks and health behaviors in Southern California. Diffusion conditions varied by changes in social norms for intervention nodes (pro-e-cigarette, anti-e-cigarette, or neutral norms) and intervention strategy, where greater pro- and anti-tobacco norms were assigned to 15% of the network based on four intervention seeding conditions: opinion leadership, betweenness centrality, segmentation, and random selection. For each network, simulations were run using the netdiffuseR package in R and multivariate generalized linear models were estimated to examine changes in diffusion dynamics. Diffusion prevalence and rate were greater in denser networks and networks with more initial e-cigarette users. Anti-e-cigarette norms significantly decreased average prevalence across all intervention conditions. Strategically selecting high betweenness centrality nodes and opinion leader nodes significantly decreased the average prevalence of e-cigarette use. The results of this study show that achieving a change in norms for 15% of a network can substantially impact e-cigarette use prevalence. Furthermore, this study enhances our knowledge of how personal and network factors affect diffusion dynamics and demonstrates that targeting social norms through network-based interventions is one avenue for slowing the spread of harmful behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"428-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251327189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diffusion of innovations theory can be used to understand how to prevent or slow the spread of harmful behaviors, such as e-cigarette use in adolescent social networks. This study explores how different network intervention strategies could impact diffusion dynamics through network simulations based on observed social norms and e-cigarette use data. Simulations were initialized with baseline network data collected from 10 schools in a prospective cohort study of adolescent social networks and health behaviors in Southern California. Diffusion conditions varied by changes in social norms for intervention nodes (pro-e-cigarette, anti-e-cigarette, or neutral norms) and intervention strategy, where greater pro- and anti-tobacco norms were assigned to 15% of the network based on four intervention seeding conditions: opinion leadership, betweenness centrality, segmentation, and random selection. For each network, simulations were run using the netdiffuseR package in R and multivariate generalized linear models were estimated to examine changes in diffusion dynamics. Diffusion prevalence and rate were greater in denser networks and networks with more initial e-cigarette users. Anti-e-cigarette norms significantly decreased average prevalence across all intervention conditions. Strategically selecting high betweenness centrality nodes and opinion leader nodes significantly decreased the average prevalence of e-cigarette use. The results of this study show that achieving a change in norms for 15% of a network can substantially impact e-cigarette use prevalence. Furthermore, this study enhances our knowledge of how personal and network factors affect diffusion dynamics and demonstrates that targeting social norms through network-based interventions is one avenue for slowing the spread of harmful behaviors.

社会规范对扩散动力学的影响:电子烟使用行为的模拟。
创新扩散理论可以用来理解如何防止或减缓有害行为的传播,比如青少年社交网络中电子烟的使用。本研究基于观察到的社会规范和电子烟使用数据,通过网络模拟探讨了不同的网络干预策略如何影响扩散动态。模拟初始化的基线网络数据来自南加州10所学校的青少年社会网络和健康行为的前瞻性队列研究。扩散条件因干预节点的社会规范(支持电子烟、反对电子烟或中立规范)和干预策略的变化而变化,其中基于四种干预播种条件:意见领导、中间性中心、分割和随机选择,将更大的支持和反烟草规范分配给15%的网络。对于每个网络,使用R中的netdiffuseR包运行模拟,并估计多元广义线性模型以检查扩散动力学的变化。在更密集的网络和初始电子烟用户更多的网络中,扩散率和扩散率更高。反电子烟规范显著降低了所有干预条件下的平均患病率。​这项研究的结果表明,在15%的网络中实现规范的改变可以显著影响电子烟的使用流行。此外,本研究增强了我们对个人因素和网络因素如何影响传播动态的认识,并表明通过基于网络的干预针对社会规范是减缓有害行为传播的一种途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信