Identifying dysphagia in the intensive care unit: Validation of the Swedish version of the Gugging swallowing screen-Intensive care unit.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anna Schandl, Liza Bergström, Jenny Selg, Anna Eliasson, Mia Hylèn, Fanny Silfwerbrand, Linda Nymark, Jenny McGreevy, Camilla Brorsson, Thorbjörn Holmlund, Patricia Hägglund
{"title":"Identifying dysphagia in the intensive care unit: Validation of the Swedish version of the Gugging swallowing screen-Intensive care unit.","authors":"Anna Schandl, Liza Bergström, Jenny Selg, Anna Eliasson, Mia Hylèn, Fanny Silfwerbrand, Linda Nymark, Jenny McGreevy, Camilla Brorsson, Thorbjörn Holmlund, Patricia Hägglund","doi":"10.1111/aas.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia is independently associated with adverse outcomes in intensive care units (ICU). Early identification through dysphagia screening does not occur routinely, negatively impacting optimal patient management. This study aimed to validate the Swedish version of the Gugging Swallowing Screen-Intensive Care Unit (GUSS-IVA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective multicentre study of 56 adult ICU patients with endotracheal intubation exceeding 48 h at three hospitals in Sweden. The GUSS-ICU was translated into Swedish (GUSS-IVA) and used to screen all prolonged intubated patients (>48 h) once extubated. The GUSS-IVA screen was conducted by ICU nursing staff and then compared with a gold standard Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) within 2 h of the GUSS-IVA screen. Fifty-one of 56 patients underwent FEES (where assessors were blinded to the GUSS-IVA screen results). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, as was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For inter-rater reliability, within 2 h of the initial screen, 29/56 patients were GUSS-IVA screened a second time by a nursing staff blinded to the first GUSS-IVA results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 56 patients, 38 (67.9%) were identified as dysphagic using the GUSS-IVA screen. With FEES, 42 of 51 patients (82.4%) were diagnosed with dysphagia; of these, 16 (31.4%) were classified as aspirating. Compared to FEES, GUSS-IVA showed high sensitivity and specificity values (81% and 89%, respectively) with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.95) and a positive predictive value of 97%. High convergent validity was obtained for GUSS-IVA compared with the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (ɸ = 0.57, p < .001) and the Functional Oral Intake Scale (ɸ = 0.52, p < .001) and moderate validity with the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (ɸ = 0.30, p = .033). The inter-rater reliability showed moderate agreement (Cohen's kappa κ = 0.501, p = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that the Swedish GUSS-IVA is a valid and reliable screen to identify dysphagic ICU patients. Given the negative impact of dysphagia on short and long-term patient outcomes, the Swedish GUSS-IVA is recommended as an essential first step by nursing staff for early identification of dysphagia for further diagnostics and subsequent patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 5","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia is independently associated with adverse outcomes in intensive care units (ICU). Early identification through dysphagia screening does not occur routinely, negatively impacting optimal patient management. This study aimed to validate the Swedish version of the Gugging Swallowing Screen-Intensive Care Unit (GUSS-IVA).

Methods: This is a prospective multicentre study of 56 adult ICU patients with endotracheal intubation exceeding 48 h at three hospitals in Sweden. The GUSS-ICU was translated into Swedish (GUSS-IVA) and used to screen all prolonged intubated patients (>48 h) once extubated. The GUSS-IVA screen was conducted by ICU nursing staff and then compared with a gold standard Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) within 2 h of the GUSS-IVA screen. Fifty-one of 56 patients underwent FEES (where assessors were blinded to the GUSS-IVA screen results). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, as was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For inter-rater reliability, within 2 h of the initial screen, 29/56 patients were GUSS-IVA screened a second time by a nursing staff blinded to the first GUSS-IVA results.

Results: Among the 56 patients, 38 (67.9%) were identified as dysphagic using the GUSS-IVA screen. With FEES, 42 of 51 patients (82.4%) were diagnosed with dysphagia; of these, 16 (31.4%) were classified as aspirating. Compared to FEES, GUSS-IVA showed high sensitivity and specificity values (81% and 89%, respectively) with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.95) and a positive predictive value of 97%. High convergent validity was obtained for GUSS-IVA compared with the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (ɸ = 0.57, p < .001) and the Functional Oral Intake Scale (ɸ = 0.52, p < .001) and moderate validity with the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (ɸ = 0.30, p = .033). The inter-rater reliability showed moderate agreement (Cohen's kappa κ = 0.501, p = .006).

Conclusions: This study indicates that the Swedish GUSS-IVA is a valid and reliable screen to identify dysphagic ICU patients. Given the negative impact of dysphagia on short and long-term patient outcomes, the Swedish GUSS-IVA is recommended as an essential first step by nursing staff for early identification of dysphagia for further diagnostics and subsequent patient management.

识别重症监护室的吞咽困难:瑞典版Gugging吞咽筛查的验证-重症监护室。
背景:吞咽困难与重症监护病房(ICU)的不良结局独立相关。通过吞咽困难筛查的早期识别并不经常发生,这对患者的最佳管理产生了负面影响。本研究旨在验证瑞典版的gugs - iva。方法:这是一项前瞻性多中心研究,对瑞典三家医院56例气管插管超过48小时的成人ICU患者进行了研究。GUSS-ICU翻译成瑞典语(GUSS-IVA),用于在拔管后对所有插管时间延长(bbb48 h)的患者进行筛查。由ICU护理人员进行GUSS-IVA筛查,然后在GUSS-IVA筛查后2小时内与金标准柔性内镜吞咽评估(FEES)进行比较。56例患者中有51例接受了费用(评估人员对gus - iva筛查结果不知情)。计算敏感性和特异性,以及95%置信区间(CI)下的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积。为了评估间的可靠性,在初始筛选后的2小时内,有29/56名患者被一名不知道第一次gus - iva结果的护理人员第二次筛查。结果:56例患者中,38例(67.9%)通过GUSS-IVA筛查诊断为吞咽困难。使用FEES, 51例患者中有42例(82.4%)被诊断为吞咽困难;其中16例(31.4%)为吸入性。与FEES相比,gus - iva具有较高的敏感性和特异性(分别为81%和89%),AUC为0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.95),阳性预测值为97%。与吞咽困难结局严重程度量表相比,GUSS-IVA获得了较高的收敛效度(h = 0.57, p)。结论:本研究表明瑞典GUSS-IVA是一种有效可靠的筛查ICU吞咽困难患者的方法。鉴于吞咽困难对患者短期和长期预后的负面影响,瑞典GUSS-IVA被推荐为护理人员早期识别吞咽困难的必要第一步,以便进一步诊断和随后的患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信