Greater Familiarity Between Surgeon and Operating Room Allied Health Staff is Associated with Shorter Case Duration - A Multi-Institutional Study.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
David A Etzioni, Melana Elliot, Lani MacMillan, Mark Tyson, Steven P Petrou, Matthew P Abdel, Christina M Cadaret, Ross F Goldberg, Elizabeth B Habermann, Robert R Cima, Yu-Hui Chang, Christopher Hasse
{"title":"Greater Familiarity Between Surgeon and Operating Room Allied Health Staff is Associated with Shorter Case Duration - A Multi-Institutional Study.","authors":"David A Etzioni, Melana Elliot, Lani MacMillan, Mark Tyson, Steven P Petrou, Matthew P Abdel, Christina M Cadaret, Ross F Goldberg, Elizabeth B Habermann, Robert R Cima, Yu-Hui Chang, Christopher Hasse","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the relationship between surgeon-staff familiarity and the time required to perform an operation.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>The clinical and operational efficiency of operating rooms (ORs) is a driver of hospital finances and patient outcomes. Surgeon-staff familiarity is an important focus for quality improvement and process optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing operations performed at four academic hospitals between July 1,2019, and December 31,2023. Exclusion criteria (urgent operations, two-specialty cases, low surgeon/specialty volume in dataset, scheduled length > 8 hours) were applied to limit heterogeneity. The exposure of interest was familiarity between surgeon and allied health staff (scrub technicians and circulating nurses) present during an operation (represented as the median staff experience with the index surgeon in the previous 180 days). The primary outcome was whether the actual case length was (versus was not) 10% shorter than the scheduled case length (\"shorter case length\"). A secondary outcome was quantification of the difference between the observed and expected case length and whether the surgical time (cut-close) was shorter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257,645 operations performed by 25 different specialties comprised the analyzed cohort. Higher levels of surgeon-staff familiarity were associated with a higher likelihood of a shorter case length (observed:expected ratio = 1.16 [1.14-1.18] for high/high levels of familiarity, compared with 0.90 [0.88-0.91] for low/low levels of familiarity). Greater familiarity was also associated with case lengths that were shorter relative to scheduled case length (high/high levels of familiarity 8.7% shorter than low/low levels, P < 0.001). Within the four most common types of cases, those operations performed by teams with higher levels of familiarity had shorter surgical times (cut-to-close).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that operations were more efficiently performed when the scrub technician and circulating nurse staff had a greater recent experience with the primary surgeon. Surgical team familiarity should be considered a focus of operational and clinical excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006711","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the relationship between surgeon-staff familiarity and the time required to perform an operation.

Summary background data: The clinical and operational efficiency of operating rooms (ORs) is a driver of hospital finances and patient outcomes. Surgeon-staff familiarity is an important focus for quality improvement and process optimization.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing operations performed at four academic hospitals between July 1,2019, and December 31,2023. Exclusion criteria (urgent operations, two-specialty cases, low surgeon/specialty volume in dataset, scheduled length > 8 hours) were applied to limit heterogeneity. The exposure of interest was familiarity between surgeon and allied health staff (scrub technicians and circulating nurses) present during an operation (represented as the median staff experience with the index surgeon in the previous 180 days). The primary outcome was whether the actual case length was (versus was not) 10% shorter than the scheduled case length ("shorter case length"). A secondary outcome was quantification of the difference between the observed and expected case length and whether the surgical time (cut-close) was shorter.

Results: A total of 257,645 operations performed by 25 different specialties comprised the analyzed cohort. Higher levels of surgeon-staff familiarity were associated with a higher likelihood of a shorter case length (observed:expected ratio = 1.16 [1.14-1.18] for high/high levels of familiarity, compared with 0.90 [0.88-0.91] for low/low levels of familiarity). Greater familiarity was also associated with case lengths that were shorter relative to scheduled case length (high/high levels of familiarity 8.7% shorter than low/low levels, P < 0.001). Within the four most common types of cases, those operations performed by teams with higher levels of familiarity had shorter surgical times (cut-to-close).

Conclusion: This study found that operations were more efficiently performed when the scrub technician and circulating nurse staff had a greater recent experience with the primary surgeon. Surgical team familiarity should be considered a focus of operational and clinical excellence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信