[Pediatric Upper Cervical Spine Injuries: a Systematic Review].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Lucie Salavcová, Jan Štulík, Ondřej Naňka
{"title":"[Pediatric Upper Cervical Spine Injuries: a Systematic Review].","authors":"Lucie Salavcová, Jan Štulík, Ondřej Naňka","doi":"10.55095/achot2024/036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The study aimed to systematically review the available literature focusing on upper cervical spine injuries in children, namely the age and sex of patients, epidemiology of injuries, classifications used, diagnosis and treatment methods, neurologic deficit, concomitant injuries, and potential complications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The systematic review was elaborated in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The studies assessing pediatric upper cervical spine injuries were searched for in the MEDLINE database in September 2023. The studies included were published between 1991 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1354 studies were found through the database search. Subsequently, 53 articles were excluded as duplicates and 1217 due to irrelevant title or abstract. The full text of 84 studies was reviewed. Sixty-nine manuscripts failed to meet the predefined criteria. In the end, the systematic review was based on 15 studies. In the cohort of paediatric patients with upper cervical spine injuries, the girls accounted for 51.1% and boys for 48.9%. X-ray (64.9%) and CT (56.2%) were the most commonly used imaging for diagnosis, with MRI (51.5%) being the least used diagnostic method. Surgical procedure was opted for in treating more than a quarter of cases (27.6%). Most of the surviving patients were neurologically intact (69.2%), a fairly large number of patients (14.4%) died. The most common concomitant injury was craniocerebral trauma (39%) and the most common treatment complication was the instrumentation failure (11.3%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Upper cervical spine injuries are rare in children and represent a relatively heterogeneous group. The literature on this topic is mostly inconsistent. Currently, there is just a few studies dealing with pediatric upper cervical spine injuries as a whole; more often the papers focus on a single type of injury. Inconsistencies also occur in defining the age limit for the pediatric spine and in defining the upper cervical spine. For these reasons, comparing the results of individual studies can be difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mean age of pediatric patients with upper cervical spine injuries was 6.7 years, with a slight predominance of girls. The most common cause of injury was traffic accidents. X-ray and CT were the most commonly used diagnostic methods and surgical therapy was opted for in treating more than a quarter of cases. More than two-thirds of the surviving patients were neurologically intact. Instrumentation failure was the most common treatment complication and craniocerebral trauma was the most common concomitant injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"92 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The study aimed to systematically review the available literature focusing on upper cervical spine injuries in children, namely the age and sex of patients, epidemiology of injuries, classifications used, diagnosis and treatment methods, neurologic deficit, concomitant injuries, and potential complications.

Material and methods: The systematic review was elaborated in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The studies assessing pediatric upper cervical spine injuries were searched for in the MEDLINE database in September 2023. The studies included were published between 1991 and 2022.

Results: A total of 1354 studies were found through the database search. Subsequently, 53 articles were excluded as duplicates and 1217 due to irrelevant title or abstract. The full text of 84 studies was reviewed. Sixty-nine manuscripts failed to meet the predefined criteria. In the end, the systematic review was based on 15 studies. In the cohort of paediatric patients with upper cervical spine injuries, the girls accounted for 51.1% and boys for 48.9%. X-ray (64.9%) and CT (56.2%) were the most commonly used imaging for diagnosis, with MRI (51.5%) being the least used diagnostic method. Surgical procedure was opted for in treating more than a quarter of cases (27.6%). Most of the surviving patients were neurologically intact (69.2%), a fairly large number of patients (14.4%) died. The most common concomitant injury was craniocerebral trauma (39%) and the most common treatment complication was the instrumentation failure (11.3%).

Discussion: Upper cervical spine injuries are rare in children and represent a relatively heterogeneous group. The literature on this topic is mostly inconsistent. Currently, there is just a few studies dealing with pediatric upper cervical spine injuries as a whole; more often the papers focus on a single type of injury. Inconsistencies also occur in defining the age limit for the pediatric spine and in defining the upper cervical spine. For these reasons, comparing the results of individual studies can be difficult.

Conclusions: The mean age of pediatric patients with upper cervical spine injuries was 6.7 years, with a slight predominance of girls. The most common cause of injury was traffic accidents. X-ray and CT were the most commonly used diagnostic methods and surgical therapy was opted for in treating more than a quarter of cases. More than two-thirds of the surviving patients were neurologically intact. Instrumentation failure was the most common treatment complication and craniocerebral trauma was the most common concomitant injury.

[儿科上颈椎损伤:系统综述]。
研究目的:本研究旨在系统回顾现有关于儿童上颈椎损伤的文献,包括患者的年龄和性别、损伤的流行病学、使用的分类、诊断和治疗方法、神经功能缺损、伴随损伤和潜在并发症。材料和方法:系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)协议进行阐述。评估儿童上颈椎损伤的研究于2023年9月在MEDLINE数据库中检索。这些研究发表于1991年至2022年之间。结果:通过数据库检索,共检索到1354项研究。随后,53篇文章被排除为重复,1217篇文章因标题或摘要不相关而被排除。本文综述了84项研究的全文。69份手稿没有达到预定的标准。最后,系统评价是基于15项研究。在儿童上颈椎损伤患者队列中,女孩占51.1%,男孩占48.9%。x线(64.9%)和CT(56.2%)是最常用的影像学诊断方法,MRI(51.5%)是最不常用的诊断方法。超过四分之一(27.6%)的病例选择手术治疗。大部分存活患者神经功能完好(69.2%),相当多的患者死亡(14.4%)。最常见的伴随损伤是颅脑外伤(39%),最常见的治疗并发症是器械失效(11.3%)。讨论:上颈椎损伤在儿童中是罕见的,代表了一个相对异质性的群体。关于这个话题的文献大多是不一致的。目前,只有少数研究将儿童上颈椎损伤作为一个整体;更多的时候,这些报纸关注的是单一类型的伤害。在确定小儿脊柱的年龄限制和确定上颈椎方面也存在不一致。由于这些原因,比较个别研究的结果可能是困难的。结论:小儿上颈椎损伤患者的平均年龄为6.7岁,女孩略占优势。最常见的伤害原因是交通事故。x线和CT是最常用的诊断方法,超过四分之一的病例选择手术治疗。超过三分之二的存活患者神经系统完好。器械失败是最常见的治疗并发症,颅脑损伤是最常见的伴随损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信