Pregnant Women's Breast Milk and Breastfeeding Myths and Associated Factors: A Case of Refugee and Non-Refugee Women

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ayça Şolt Kırca, Elif Dağli, Seçil Hür
{"title":"Pregnant Women's Breast Milk and Breastfeeding Myths and Associated Factors: A Case of Refugee and Non-Refugee Women","authors":"Ayça Şolt Kırca,&nbsp;Elif Dağli,&nbsp;Seçil Hür","doi":"10.1111/jep.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of breast milk and breastfeeding myths during pregnancy among Turkish, Turkish–Romani, and Syrian pregnant women and compare the similarities and differences between the countries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>The sample of the study consisted of 330 pregnant women who presented to a hospital. Data were collected with a ‘Descriptive Information Form’ and ‘Breast Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Form’ developed by the researchers. The Breast Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Form consists of items expressing common beliefs about breast milk and breastfeeding, and each item is evaluated with one of the following three options: ‘yes,’ ‘no,’ and ‘no idea.’ The forms were applied face to face to the pregnant women who came to the outpatient clinic. The data were evaluated on the SPSS (14.0) software package, and chi-square and advanced analyses were used for the statistical analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Turkish, Turkish-Romani, and Syrian pregnant women who made up the study sample had similar socio-demographic characteristics. It was determined that there were intercultural differences in 28 out of 30 myths evaluated by Turkish, Turkish-Romani, and Syrian mothers regarding breast milk and breastfeeding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>It was determined that Turkish pregnant women had different myths about breast milk and breastfeeding from Syrian and Turkish-Romani pregnant women. It can be said that false beliefs and attitudes about breast milk and breastfeeding are common.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of breast milk and breastfeeding myths during pregnancy among Turkish, Turkish–Romani, and Syrian pregnant women and compare the similarities and differences between the countries.

Methods and Study Design

The sample of the study consisted of 330 pregnant women who presented to a hospital. Data were collected with a ‘Descriptive Information Form’ and ‘Breast Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Form’ developed by the researchers. The Breast Milk and Breastfeeding Myths Form consists of items expressing common beliefs about breast milk and breastfeeding, and each item is evaluated with one of the following three options: ‘yes,’ ‘no,’ and ‘no idea.’ The forms were applied face to face to the pregnant women who came to the outpatient clinic. The data were evaluated on the SPSS (14.0) software package, and chi-square and advanced analyses were used for the statistical analysis.

Results

Turkish, Turkish-Romani, and Syrian pregnant women who made up the study sample had similar socio-demographic characteristics. It was determined that there were intercultural differences in 28 out of 30 myths evaluated by Turkish, Turkish-Romani, and Syrian mothers regarding breast milk and breastfeeding.

Conclusion

It was determined that Turkish pregnant women had different myths about breast milk and breastfeeding from Syrian and Turkish-Romani pregnant women. It can be said that false beliefs and attitudes about breast milk and breastfeeding are common.

孕妇的母乳和母乳喂养的神话和相关因素:一个案例的难民和非难民妇女
本研究旨在确定土耳其、土耳其-罗姆人和叙利亚孕妇在怀孕期间母乳喂养和母乳喂养神话的流行程度,并比较各国之间的异同。方法和研究设计本研究的样本包括330名到医院就诊的孕妇。数据是通过研究人员开发的“描述性信息表”和“母乳和母乳喂养神话表”收集的。母乳和母乳喂养迷思表由表达关于母乳和母乳喂养的普遍看法的项目组成,每个项目都用以下三个选项中的一个进行评估:“是”、“否”和“不知道”。这些表格是面对面地发给来到门诊的孕妇的。采用SPSS(14.0)软件包对数据进行评价,采用卡方分析和高级分析进行统计分析。结果组成研究样本的土耳其、土耳其-罗姆和叙利亚孕妇具有相似的社会人口统计学特征。在土耳其、土耳其裔罗姆人和叙利亚母亲评估的30个关于母乳和母乳喂养的神话中,有28个存在跨文化差异。结论土耳其孕妇对母乳和母乳喂养的误解与叙利亚孕妇和土耳其-罗姆孕妇不同。可以说,对母乳和母乳喂养的错误观念和态度是很普遍的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信