An investigation of Frequentist and Ensemble Bayesian-aided techniques for prioritizing anomaly detection methods in time-series data

Vignesh Divakaran , Vipasha Rana
{"title":"An investigation of Frequentist and Ensemble Bayesian-aided techniques for prioritizing anomaly detection methods in time-series data","authors":"Vignesh Divakaran ,&nbsp;Vipasha Rana","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately detecting anomalous points in time-series data is critical, as false positives can mislead business stakeholders, waste valuable resources, and diminish the overall impact of the detection system. While various statistical and machine learning techniques are employed to flag potential anomalies, the challenge lies in evaluating the significance of each approach and refining the results to isolate definitive anomalies. This paper examines multiple anomaly tagging techniques and introduces novel weightage assignment methods to prioritize the most effective approaches, filtering out less reliable ones. Specifically, we explore two methods: simple Frequentist approach and Ensemble Bayesian-aided approach, with an emphasis on why the latter is particularly well-suited for anomaly detection. The proposed methodology is validated both theoretically and empirically on time-series datasets. Our findings demonstrate that the Ensemble Bayesian-aided approach significantly improves detection accuracy by accounting for future uncertainty and addressing edge case fallacies inherent in individual tagging methods. This research provides a robust framework for anomaly detection, offering a powerful solution that enhances precision and reliability across diverse applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662225000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately detecting anomalous points in time-series data is critical, as false positives can mislead business stakeholders, waste valuable resources, and diminish the overall impact of the detection system. While various statistical and machine learning techniques are employed to flag potential anomalies, the challenge lies in evaluating the significance of each approach and refining the results to isolate definitive anomalies. This paper examines multiple anomaly tagging techniques and introduces novel weightage assignment methods to prioritize the most effective approaches, filtering out less reliable ones. Specifically, we explore two methods: simple Frequentist approach and Ensemble Bayesian-aided approach, with an emphasis on why the latter is particularly well-suited for anomaly detection. The proposed methodology is validated both theoretically and empirically on time-series datasets. Our findings demonstrate that the Ensemble Bayesian-aided approach significantly improves detection accuracy by accounting for future uncertainty and addressing edge case fallacies inherent in individual tagging methods. This research provides a robust framework for anomaly detection, offering a powerful solution that enhances precision and reliability across diverse applications.
频率和集成贝叶斯辅助技术在时间序列数据中优先化异常检测方法的研究
准确地检测时间序列数据中的异常点是至关重要的,因为误报可能会误导业务利益相关者,浪费宝贵的资源,并降低检测系统的总体影响。虽然使用了各种统计和机器学习技术来标记潜在的异常,但挑战在于评估每种方法的重要性,并改进结果以隔离明确的异常。本文研究了多种异常标记技术,并引入了新的权重分配方法,以优先考虑最有效的方法,过滤掉不可靠的方法。具体来说,我们探讨了两种方法:简单频率方法和集成贝叶斯辅助方法,重点是为什么后者特别适合于异常检测。该方法在时间序列数据集上得到了理论和经验的验证。我们的研究结果表明,集成贝叶斯辅助方法通过考虑未来的不确定性和解决单个标记方法固有的边缘情况谬论,显着提高了检测精度。这项研究为异常检测提供了一个强大的框架,提供了一个强大的解决方案,提高了不同应用的精度和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信