Quality in driving as a function of the interpretation of the context of action

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Alessandro Gennaro , Fabiana Sasso , Skaiste Kerušauskaitė , Matteo Reho , Marco Petrelli , Giuseppe Cantisani , Simone Sportiello , Sergio Salvatore
{"title":"Quality in driving as a function of the interpretation of the context of action","authors":"Alessandro Gennaro ,&nbsp;Fabiana Sasso ,&nbsp;Skaiste Kerušauskaitė ,&nbsp;Matteo Reho ,&nbsp;Marco Petrelli ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Cantisani ,&nbsp;Simone Sportiello ,&nbsp;Sergio Salvatore","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research highlights the multifaced nature of safe driving behaviors referring to individual factors, driving environment interaction, and social norms. This work focuses on a further factor: drivers’ interpretation of the context of driving. Aligned to the Semiotic Dimensional Model (SDM) highlighting the role of context interpretation in channeling behaviors, we tested the hypothesis that the lack of contextual information (uncertainty) induces drivers to an affective context interpretation, which decreases the quality of driving behavior. To this end, we designed a simulation paradigm to compare the quality of driving of participants exposed to a condition of lack of contextual information (N = 25) with a control group exposed to a condition of availability of contextual information (N = 25). Both conditions were induced through a prime. Standard deviations of telemetric data were gathered and subjected to Exploratory Factor Analysis to obtain an index of driving quality. An ANCOVA tested the hypothesis, controlling the effect of vehicle velocity and workload. Consistently with the hypothesis, results demonstrated that the experimental group (No Contextual Information condition) showed lower quality in driving than the control group. Findings shed light on the importance of contextual information in regulating driving behavior, suggesting possible new strategies to promote drivers’ competence in driving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research highlights the multifaced nature of safe driving behaviors referring to individual factors, driving environment interaction, and social norms. This work focuses on a further factor: drivers’ interpretation of the context of driving. Aligned to the Semiotic Dimensional Model (SDM) highlighting the role of context interpretation in channeling behaviors, we tested the hypothesis that the lack of contextual information (uncertainty) induces drivers to an affective context interpretation, which decreases the quality of driving behavior. To this end, we designed a simulation paradigm to compare the quality of driving of participants exposed to a condition of lack of contextual information (N = 25) with a control group exposed to a condition of availability of contextual information (N = 25). Both conditions were induced through a prime. Standard deviations of telemetric data were gathered and subjected to Exploratory Factor Analysis to obtain an index of driving quality. An ANCOVA tested the hypothesis, controlling the effect of vehicle velocity and workload. Consistently with the hypothesis, results demonstrated that the experimental group (No Contextual Information condition) showed lower quality in driving than the control group. Findings shed light on the importance of contextual information in regulating driving behavior, suggesting possible new strategies to promote drivers’ competence in driving.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信