{"title":"Quality in driving as a function of the interpretation of the context of action","authors":"Alessandro Gennaro , Fabiana Sasso , Skaiste Kerušauskaitė , Matteo Reho , Marco Petrelli , Giuseppe Cantisani , Simone Sportiello , Sergio Salvatore","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research highlights the multifaced nature of safe driving behaviors referring to individual factors, driving environment interaction, and social norms. This work focuses on a further factor: drivers’ interpretation of the context of driving. Aligned to the Semiotic Dimensional Model (SDM) highlighting the role of context interpretation in channeling behaviors, we tested the hypothesis that the lack of contextual information (uncertainty) induces drivers to an affective context interpretation, which decreases the quality of driving behavior. To this end, we designed a simulation paradigm to compare the quality of driving of participants exposed to a condition of lack of contextual information (N = 25) with a control group exposed to a condition of availability of contextual information (N = 25). Both conditions were induced through a prime. Standard deviations of telemetric data were gathered and subjected to Exploratory Factor Analysis to obtain an index of driving quality. An ANCOVA tested the hypothesis, controlling the effect of vehicle velocity and workload. Consistently with the hypothesis, results demonstrated that the experimental group (No Contextual Information condition) showed lower quality in driving than the control group. Findings shed light on the importance of contextual information in regulating driving behavior, suggesting possible new strategies to promote drivers’ competence in driving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research highlights the multifaced nature of safe driving behaviors referring to individual factors, driving environment interaction, and social norms. This work focuses on a further factor: drivers’ interpretation of the context of driving. Aligned to the Semiotic Dimensional Model (SDM) highlighting the role of context interpretation in channeling behaviors, we tested the hypothesis that the lack of contextual information (uncertainty) induces drivers to an affective context interpretation, which decreases the quality of driving behavior. To this end, we designed a simulation paradigm to compare the quality of driving of participants exposed to a condition of lack of contextual information (N = 25) with a control group exposed to a condition of availability of contextual information (N = 25). Both conditions were induced through a prime. Standard deviations of telemetric data were gathered and subjected to Exploratory Factor Analysis to obtain an index of driving quality. An ANCOVA tested the hypothesis, controlling the effect of vehicle velocity and workload. Consistently with the hypothesis, results demonstrated that the experimental group (No Contextual Information condition) showed lower quality in driving than the control group. Findings shed light on the importance of contextual information in regulating driving behavior, suggesting possible new strategies to promote drivers’ competence in driving.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.