Assessing the predictive accuracy of ChatGPT-based image analysis in forecasting long-term scar characteristics from 3-month assessments – A pilot study

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Antoinette T. Nguyen , Rena A. Li , Robert D. Galiano
{"title":"Assessing the predictive accuracy of ChatGPT-based image analysis in forecasting long-term scar characteristics from 3-month assessments – A pilot study","authors":"Antoinette T. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Rena A. Li ,&nbsp;Robert D. Galiano","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Scarring significantly impacts patient quality of life, yet traditional assessments often rely on subjective evaluations, resulting in variability in predictions. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model in forecasting scar characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-institution prospective cohort study included 40 patients who underwent plastic surgery. Scar images were captured at 3 and 12 months, assessing characteristics such as vascularity, pigmentation, height, and width. The ChatGPT model predicted binary outcomes (good vs. bad scars) and continuous outcomes. Predictive accuracy was measured using metrics including mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model achieved an overall accuracy of 97.5% for binary classifications of scars. McNemar's test confirmed no significant differences between predicted and actual outcomes. For continuous outcomes, the MAE was 0.65, with an MSE of 0.9 and RMSE of 0.95, indicating moderate accuracy. Vascularity predictions yielded an R² of 0.234, whereas height and width showed stronger correlations with R² values of 0.857 and 0.956, respectively. Statistically significant differences in paired t-tests were observed for pigmentation (t = 4.356, p = 9.319e-05) and width (t = 2.896, p = 0.0062).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model demonstrates excellent predictive accuracy in binary scar classification and provides valuable insights for scar characteristics. Further refinement is necessary for improving predictions of dynamic features such as vascularity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174868152500186X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Scarring significantly impacts patient quality of life, yet traditional assessments often rely on subjective evaluations, resulting in variability in predictions. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model in forecasting scar characteristics.

Methods

This single-institution prospective cohort study included 40 patients who underwent plastic surgery. Scar images were captured at 3 and 12 months, assessing characteristics such as vascularity, pigmentation, height, and width. The ChatGPT model predicted binary outcomes (good vs. bad scars) and continuous outcomes. Predictive accuracy was measured using metrics including mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²).

Results

The model achieved an overall accuracy of 97.5% for binary classifications of scars. McNemar's test confirmed no significant differences between predicted and actual outcomes. For continuous outcomes, the MAE was 0.65, with an MSE of 0.9 and RMSE of 0.95, indicating moderate accuracy. Vascularity predictions yielded an R² of 0.234, whereas height and width showed stronger correlations with R² values of 0.857 and 0.956, respectively. Statistically significant differences in paired t-tests were observed for pigmentation (t = 4.356, p = 9.319e-05) and width (t = 2.896, p = 0.0062).

Conclusion

The Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model demonstrates excellent predictive accuracy in binary scar classification and provides valuable insights for scar characteristics. Further refinement is necessary for improving predictions of dynamic features such as vascularity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信