Improving soil moisture prediction using Gaussian process regression

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Xiaomo Zhang, Xin Sun, Zhulu Lin
{"title":"Improving soil moisture prediction using Gaussian process regression","authors":"Xiaomo Zhang,&nbsp;Xin Sun,&nbsp;Zhulu Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.100905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil moisture plays a vital role in agriculture and hydrology, influencing key processes like plant growth and evaporation. Recent advancements in soil moisture monitoring have improved our ability to measure it at different scales, but challenges persist at intermediate scales that are crucial for precision agriculture. To address this research gap, innovative methods like machine learning (ML) are being explored to improve prediction accuracy, overcoming the limitations of traditional models. By leveraging an extensive dataset that spans multiple sites and seasons, we aim to improve predictions for both surface and root zone soil moisture. In this study, machine learning models including multilinear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and Gaussian process regression (GPR), were developed and compared for soil moisture predictions at different depths at 29 weather stations in the Red River Valley using features such as time, locations, meteorological data, soil physical properties, and remote sensing data. Our research showed that GPR with automatic relevant determination kernels had the best performance with <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span> values greater than 0.95 at almost all depths when including all features. GPR (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>=0.95–0.99, RMSE=0.0045–0.0224, MAE=0.0012–0.0139) outperformed MLR (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>=0.69–0.93, RMSE=0.0328–0.0555, MAE=0.0197–0.0427) and SVM (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></math></span>=0.49–0.85, RMSE=0.0648–0.0747, MAE=0.0442–0.0566) for soil moisture prediction. All models performed better when predicting moisture in subsoils (20–100 cm) than in topsoil (0–10 cm). Our research highlights the effectiveness of GPR as a powerful ML tool that enhances soil moisture management precision, ultimately contributing to more effective and smart agricultural practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100905"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525001388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil moisture plays a vital role in agriculture and hydrology, influencing key processes like plant growth and evaporation. Recent advancements in soil moisture monitoring have improved our ability to measure it at different scales, but challenges persist at intermediate scales that are crucial for precision agriculture. To address this research gap, innovative methods like machine learning (ML) are being explored to improve prediction accuracy, overcoming the limitations of traditional models. By leveraging an extensive dataset that spans multiple sites and seasons, we aim to improve predictions for both surface and root zone soil moisture. In this study, machine learning models including multilinear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and Gaussian process regression (GPR), were developed and compared for soil moisture predictions at different depths at 29 weather stations in the Red River Valley using features such as time, locations, meteorological data, soil physical properties, and remote sensing data. Our research showed that GPR with automatic relevant determination kernels had the best performance with R2 values greater than 0.95 at almost all depths when including all features. GPR (R2=0.95–0.99, RMSE=0.0045–0.0224, MAE=0.0012–0.0139) outperformed MLR (R2=0.69–0.93, RMSE=0.0328–0.0555, MAE=0.0197–0.0427) and SVM (R2=0.49–0.85, RMSE=0.0648–0.0747, MAE=0.0442–0.0566) for soil moisture prediction. All models performed better when predicting moisture in subsoils (20–100 cm) than in topsoil (0–10 cm). Our research highlights the effectiveness of GPR as a powerful ML tool that enhances soil moisture management precision, ultimately contributing to more effective and smart agricultural practices.

Abstract Image

改进高斯过程回归预测土壤水分的方法
土壤水分在农业和水文学中起着至关重要的作用,影响着植物生长和蒸发等关键过程。土壤湿度监测的最新进展提高了我们在不同尺度上测量土壤湿度的能力,但在对精准农业至关重要的中间尺度上仍然存在挑战。为了解决这一研究差距,人们正在探索机器学习(ML)等创新方法,以提高预测准确性,克服传统模型的局限性。通过利用跨越多个地点和季节的广泛数据集,我们的目标是改进对地表和根区土壤湿度的预测。本研究采用多线性回归(MLR)、支持向量机(SVM)和高斯过程回归(GPR)等机器学习模型,利用时间、地点、气象数据、土壤物理性质和遥感数据等特征,对红河谷29个气象站不同深度的土壤湿度进行预测。我们的研究表明,在包含所有特征的情况下,具有自动相关确定核的GPR在几乎所有深度上都具有最佳性能,R2值大于0.95。GPR (R2=0.95 ~ 0.99, RMSE=0.0045 ~ 0.0224, MAE=0.0012 ~ 0.0139)在土壤湿度预测上优于MLR (R2=0.69 ~ 0.93, RMSE=0.0328 ~ 0.0555, MAE=0.0197 ~ 0.0427)和SVM (R2=0.49 ~ 0.85, RMSE=0.0648 ~ 0.0747, MAE=0.0442 ~ 0.0566)。所有模型在预测底土(20-100 cm)水分时都优于表土(0-10 cm)。我们的研究强调了探地雷达作为一种强大的机器学习工具的有效性,它可以提高土壤湿度管理的精度,最终有助于更有效和智能的农业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信