{"title":"Structures of feeling in the affective economies of renting in the Majority World: An interpretative synthesis of qualitative research","authors":"Adriana Mihaela Soaita","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent interest in private rented housing seen as a structural mechanism generator of inequalities of wealth, health and wellbeing has been dominated by accounts of tenants’ and landlords’ experiences in the Minority World. Advancing an interpretative synthesis of qualitative research focused on the understudied Majority World, hence a triple hermeneutic process of interpretation, this paper mobilizes Raymond Williams’ concept of ‘structures of feeling’ as a lens through which to engage with and better understand tenants’ and landlords’ experiences of renting in the different historical contexts of Eastern Europe, Western Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Drawing on three different theoretical routes, I develop a tripartite conceptualization of three structures of feeling – greed and exploitation, ethics of care, and cruel optimism – which inform my interpretative journey of substantiating the rich social tapestry of the affective economies of renting across 40 reviewed papers. Of a broader currency to housing and social policy studies, this theoretical interpretation shows that the affective economies of private renting are not only shaped by socioeconomic, political, regulatory or material structures but also by vivid structures of feeling that shape lived experiences in their own right as well as through their capacities of affecting those other structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent interest in private rented housing seen as a structural mechanism generator of inequalities of wealth, health and wellbeing has been dominated by accounts of tenants’ and landlords’ experiences in the Minority World. Advancing an interpretative synthesis of qualitative research focused on the understudied Majority World, hence a triple hermeneutic process of interpretation, this paper mobilizes Raymond Williams’ concept of ‘structures of feeling’ as a lens through which to engage with and better understand tenants’ and landlords’ experiences of renting in the different historical contexts of Eastern Europe, Western Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Drawing on three different theoretical routes, I develop a tripartite conceptualization of three structures of feeling – greed and exploitation, ethics of care, and cruel optimism – which inform my interpretative journey of substantiating the rich social tapestry of the affective economies of renting across 40 reviewed papers. Of a broader currency to housing and social policy studies, this theoretical interpretation shows that the affective economies of private renting are not only shaped by socioeconomic, political, regulatory or material structures but also by vivid structures of feeling that shape lived experiences in their own right as well as through their capacities of affecting those other structures.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.