Optimal security and pricing strategies for AI cloud service providers: Balancing effort and price discounts across public, private, and hybrid AI cloud models

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Xiaotong Guo , Yong He , Joshua Ignatius
{"title":"Optimal security and pricing strategies for AI cloud service providers: Balancing effort and price discounts across public, private, and hybrid AI cloud models","authors":"Xiaotong Guo ,&nbsp;Yong He ,&nbsp;Joshua Ignatius","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we focus on cloud security and pricing as key factors that influence end users' choices. We develop an analytical model to examine how an artificial intelligence (AI) cloud service provider optimally sets security investments and price discounts, considering users' different views of public, private, and hybrid AI cloud services. Our results show how end users' characteristics and market dynamics affect these strategies and reveal the balance providers must strike between improving user experiences, capturing market share, and maximizing profits. We find that the provider's control over AI cloud security—along with security costs for both the provider and users, as well as users' potential security losses—plays a critical role in shaping effective strategies. In low-security-loss environments, end users gain more from choosing public AI cloud solutions. However, private AI cloud solutions become more favorable if the provider's security cost coefficient falls within certain limits. In the hybrid AI cloud scenario, the model becomes more complex. Under some conditions, security investment and price discounts act as complementary strategies; in others, they substitute for one another. We also analyze how these choices affect market share and profitability, and find that in some cases, security investments can outperform price discounts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 109605"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325000908","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we focus on cloud security and pricing as key factors that influence end users' choices. We develop an analytical model to examine how an artificial intelligence (AI) cloud service provider optimally sets security investments and price discounts, considering users' different views of public, private, and hybrid AI cloud services. Our results show how end users' characteristics and market dynamics affect these strategies and reveal the balance providers must strike between improving user experiences, capturing market share, and maximizing profits. We find that the provider's control over AI cloud security—along with security costs for both the provider and users, as well as users' potential security losses—plays a critical role in shaping effective strategies. In low-security-loss environments, end users gain more from choosing public AI cloud solutions. However, private AI cloud solutions become more favorable if the provider's security cost coefficient falls within certain limits. In the hybrid AI cloud scenario, the model becomes more complex. Under some conditions, security investment and price discounts act as complementary strategies; in others, they substitute for one another. We also analyze how these choices affect market share and profitability, and find that in some cases, security investments can outperform price discounts.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信