Optimization of shoulder synthetic MRI through post-processing and comparison with conventional MRI

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Naoto Nishizawa , Hidetake Yabuuchi , Kei Nishikawa , Tatsuhiro Wada , Kouji Kobayashi , Chiaki Tokunaga , Tsukasa Kojima , Takumi Ohnishi , Yuji Yano , Kouji Sagiyama , Tomoyuki Hida , Yuzo Yamasaki , Takuya Hino , Kousei Ishigami
{"title":"Optimization of shoulder synthetic MRI through post-processing and comparison with conventional MRI","authors":"Naoto Nishizawa ,&nbsp;Hidetake Yabuuchi ,&nbsp;Kei Nishikawa ,&nbsp;Tatsuhiro Wada ,&nbsp;Kouji Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Chiaki Tokunaga ,&nbsp;Tsukasa Kojima ,&nbsp;Takumi Ohnishi ,&nbsp;Yuji Yano ,&nbsp;Kouji Sagiyama ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Hida ,&nbsp;Yuzo Yamasaki ,&nbsp;Takuya Hino ,&nbsp;Kousei Ishigami","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the utility of synthetic MRI of the shoulder compared with conventional MRI and to optimize the parameters of morphological images through post-processing. Additionally, we aimed to assess the agreement of T2 values between multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) and multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequences.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty healthy volunteers underwent shoulder MRI. The optimal post-processing parameters for the tendon–muscle contrast were examined using synthetic MRI, and two radiologists analyzed three image sets: conventional images, synthetic images using preset parameters, and optimized images. Qualitative analysis included assessment of the visibility of anatomical structures, overall image quality, and magic angle effect, whereas the quantitative analysis included measurement of the relative signal intensity and relative contrast. The T2 values of the articular cartilage and supraspinatus muscle were measured for each sequence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Images synthesized with short echo times and long repetition times showed high tendon–muscle contrast. For fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, conventional images showed the highest image quality (p &lt; 0.001), whereas the optimized images achieved comparable visibility of the rotator cuff (p = 0.031–1.0). No significant differences were observed among image sets in proton density-weighted images and T1-weighted images (p &gt; 0.05). The T2 values of the MDME sequence were consistent with those of the MESE sequence at the muscle (p = 0.81), but were approximately 8.3 ms longer at the cartilage (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Synthetic MRI provided acceptable image quality using appropriate post-processing parameters. The simultaneous acquisition of multiple morphological images and quantitative maps within five minutes holds promise for shoulder examination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 112069"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2500155X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the utility of synthetic MRI of the shoulder compared with conventional MRI and to optimize the parameters of morphological images through post-processing. Additionally, we aimed to assess the agreement of T2 values between multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) and multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequences.

Methods

Twenty healthy volunteers underwent shoulder MRI. The optimal post-processing parameters for the tendon–muscle contrast were examined using synthetic MRI, and two radiologists analyzed three image sets: conventional images, synthetic images using preset parameters, and optimized images. Qualitative analysis included assessment of the visibility of anatomical structures, overall image quality, and magic angle effect, whereas the quantitative analysis included measurement of the relative signal intensity and relative contrast. The T2 values of the articular cartilage and supraspinatus muscle were measured for each sequence.

Results

Images synthesized with short echo times and long repetition times showed high tendon–muscle contrast. For fat-suppressed T2-weighted images, conventional images showed the highest image quality (p < 0.001), whereas the optimized images achieved comparable visibility of the rotator cuff (p = 0.031–1.0). No significant differences were observed among image sets in proton density-weighted images and T1-weighted images (p > 0.05). The T2 values of the MDME sequence were consistent with those of the MESE sequence at the muscle (p = 0.81), but were approximately 8.3 ms longer at the cartilage (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Synthetic MRI provided acceptable image quality using appropriate post-processing parameters. The simultaneous acquisition of multiple morphological images and quantitative maps within five minutes holds promise for shoulder examination.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信