A matched case-control study on the attributable risk of CES-D positivity to the incidence of COVID-19 breakthrough infections.

Environmental and occupational health practice Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1539/eohp.2024-0007-OA
Yosuke Shimada, Satoshi Hori, Hiroshi Fukuda, Narimasa Katsuta, Mizue Saita, Minoru Ohno, Masaya Satoh, Mari Sato, Toshio Naito
{"title":"A matched case-control study on the attributable risk of CES-D positivity to the incidence of COVID-19 breakthrough infections.","authors":"Yosuke Shimada, Satoshi Hori, Hiroshi Fukuda, Narimasa Katsuta, Mizue Saita, Minoru Ohno, Masaya Satoh, Mari Sato, Toshio Naito","doi":"10.1539/eohp.2024-0007-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) positivity (16 and above) is a risk factor for breakthrough infections of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a matched case-control study was conducted among hospital employees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were matched based on known risk factors, including serum SARS-CoV-2 anti-S antibodies. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted with CES-D score measured at baseline as the explanatory variable and the presence of breakthrough infection after a specified period as the outcome variable, and gender, age, and other covariates were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic regression analysis showed that CES-D positivity was significantly associated with the breakthrough COVID-19 infections (odds ratio 4.393; 95% confidence interval, 1.318-14.642, P=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An increase in the number of hospital employees with CES-D positivity during the pandemic might contribute to a rise in breakthrough infections. It is considered necessary to alleviate people's stress levels through the enhancement of mental health care interventions, complementing infection control measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":520443,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and occupational health practice","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and occupational health practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2024-0007-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) positivity (16 and above) is a risk factor for breakthrough infections of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a matched case-control study was conducted among hospital employees.

Methods: Participants were matched based on known risk factors, including serum SARS-CoV-2 anti-S antibodies. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted with CES-D score measured at baseline as the explanatory variable and the presence of breakthrough infection after a specified period as the outcome variable, and gender, age, and other covariates were included.

Results: Logistic regression analysis showed that CES-D positivity was significantly associated with the breakthrough COVID-19 infections (odds ratio 4.393; 95% confidence interval, 1.318-14.642, P=0.016).

Conclusions: An increase in the number of hospital employees with CES-D positivity during the pandemic might contribute to a rise in breakthrough infections. It is considered necessary to alleviate people's stress levels through the enhancement of mental health care interventions, complementing infection control measures.

CES-D阳性归因风险与COVID-19突破性感染发生率的匹配病例对照研究
目的:研究美国流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)阳性(16及以上)是否为2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)突破性感染的危险因素,在医院员工中进行匹配病例对照研究。方法:根据已知的危险因素(包括血清SARS-CoV-2抗- s抗体)对参与者进行匹配。以基线时测得的CES-D评分为解释变量,规定时间后是否存在突破性感染为结果变量,纳入性别、年龄等协变量,进行多因素logistic回归分析。结果:Logistic回归分析显示,CES-D阳性与新冠肺炎突破性感染呈显著相关(优势比4.393;95%置信区间为1.318 ~ 14.642,P=0.016)。结论:大流行期间,医院工作人员CES-D阳性人数的增加可能导致突破性感染的增加。人们认为有必要通过加强精神保健干预措施,补充感染控制措施,减轻人们的压力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信