Impact of China's primary healthcare reforms on utilisation, payments and self-reported health: a quasi-experimental analysis of a middle-aged and older cohort 2011-2018.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-03-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001595
Chang Cai, Christopher Millett, Shangzhi Xiong, Maoyi Tian, Jin Xu, Thomas Hone
{"title":"Impact of China's primary healthcare reforms on utilisation, payments and self-reported health: a quasi-experimental analysis of a middle-aged and older cohort 2011-2018.","authors":"Chang Cai, Christopher Millett, Shangzhi Xiong, Maoyi Tian, Jin Xu, Thomas Hone","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive health reforms aimed at strengthening primary healthcare (PHC) are infrequently adopted and often poorly evaluated in low-income and middle-income countries. China launched a system-wide PHC reform with a staggered roll-out between 2014 and 2018 with multiple components: (1) gatekeeping via tiered reimbursement, (2) a family physician scheme and (3) a two-way referral system between PHC facilities and hospitals. This study examines the reform impacts on health service utilisation, out-of-pocket expenditures, health outcomes and health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The staggered roll-out of the reforms in 125 cities across China was identified using web-scraping. Using longitudinal data (2011-2018) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (a cohort aged ≥45), this study adopted a difference-in-differences method to assess the reform's impacts on: (1) visits to PHC facilities, (2) hospitalisation, (3) out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs) and (4) self-reported health. Subgroup analyses were conducted by rural/urban populations and wealth quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reform had small and short-lived impacts-a 7.8% increase in the probability of visiting PHC facilities (95% CI 0.3 to 15.2), a 10.2% increase in reporting good health (95% CI 0.6 to 19.8) and an 873.9 Chinese Yuan (US$129.1) increase in average annual OOPEs (95% CI 57.9 to 1689.9) in the first year of reform implementation. There was no impact on hospitalisation. Increases in PHC utilisation were only found in rural and lower-income populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>China's PHC reforms had some modest, temporary impacts on increasing primary care utilisation and self-reported health. However, further interventions are needed to transition away from the hospital-centric health system and to increase financial protection and health equity in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive health reforms aimed at strengthening primary healthcare (PHC) are infrequently adopted and often poorly evaluated in low-income and middle-income countries. China launched a system-wide PHC reform with a staggered roll-out between 2014 and 2018 with multiple components: (1) gatekeeping via tiered reimbursement, (2) a family physician scheme and (3) a two-way referral system between PHC facilities and hospitals. This study examines the reform impacts on health service utilisation, out-of-pocket expenditures, health outcomes and health inequalities.

Methods: The staggered roll-out of the reforms in 125 cities across China was identified using web-scraping. Using longitudinal data (2011-2018) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (a cohort aged ≥45), this study adopted a difference-in-differences method to assess the reform's impacts on: (1) visits to PHC facilities, (2) hospitalisation, (3) out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs) and (4) self-reported health. Subgroup analyses were conducted by rural/urban populations and wealth quartiles.

Results: The reform had small and short-lived impacts-a 7.8% increase in the probability of visiting PHC facilities (95% CI 0.3 to 15.2), a 10.2% increase in reporting good health (95% CI 0.6 to 19.8) and an 873.9 Chinese Yuan (US$129.1) increase in average annual OOPEs (95% CI 57.9 to 1689.9) in the first year of reform implementation. There was no impact on hospitalisation. Increases in PHC utilisation were only found in rural and lower-income populations.

Conclusions: China's PHC reforms had some modest, temporary impacts on increasing primary care utilisation and self-reported health. However, further interventions are needed to transition away from the hospital-centric health system and to increase financial protection and health equity in China.

中国初级医疗改革对利用、支付和自我报告健康状况的影响:2011-2018年中老年人群的准实验分析
背景:在低收入和中等收入国家,旨在加强初级卫生保健(PHC)的全面卫生改革很少被采用,而且往往评价不佳。2014年至2018年,中国启动了一项全系统的初级保健改革,分阶段实施,改革内容包括:(1)分级报销守门;(2)家庭医生计划;(3)初级保健机构与医院之间的双向转诊制度。本研究考察了改革对卫生服务利用、自费支出、卫生结果和卫生不平等的影响。方法:利用网络抓取技术确定了中国125个城市的错开改革。本研究使用中国健康与退休纵向研究(2011-2018)的纵向数据(年龄≥45岁),采用差异中差法评估改革对以下方面的影响:(1)初级保健机构的就诊次数,(2)住院率,(3)自费支出(OOPEs)和(4)自我报告健康。亚组分析按农村/城市人口和财富四分位数进行。结果:改革产生了小而短暂的影响-在改革实施的第一年,访问初级保健设施的概率增加了7.8% (95% CI 0.3至15.2),报告健康状况良好的人数增加了10.2% (95% CI 0.6至19.8),年均OOPEs增加了873.9元人民币(95% CI 57.9至1689.9)。对住院治疗没有影响。初级保健利用的增加仅在农村和低收入人口中发现。结论:中国的初级保健改革对提高初级保健使用率和自我报告健康状况有一定的暂时影响。然而,需要进一步的干预措施,以摆脱以医院为中心的卫生系统,并增加中国的财政保护和卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信