Using the Perspectives of Advanced Practice Providers to Design Strategies to Increase Engagement of Surgical Patients in Advance Care Planning.

Christopher L Johnson, Katherine E Barnes, Alexis Colley, Jeanette Broering, Alisa Yee, Tasce Bongiovanni, Sanziana Roman, Elizabeth C Wick
{"title":"Using the Perspectives of Advanced Practice Providers to Design Strategies to Increase Engagement of Surgical Patients in Advance Care Planning.","authors":"Christopher L Johnson, Katherine E Barnes, Alexis Colley, Jeanette Broering, Alisa Yee, Tasce Bongiovanni, Sanziana Roman, Elizabeth C Wick","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Advanced practice providers (APPs) are essential members of surgical teams. We sought to understand the barriers and facilitators they perceive when participating in advanced care planning (ACP) discussions with patients and use this knowledge to design strategies to promote interprofessional ACP uptake for surgical services and potentially extend ACP discussions and documentation to more patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>ACP has been challenging to integrate into surgical practice despite being endorsed by national societies and payors as an essential aspect of caring for older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using qualitative and quantitative methods, we surveyed and interviewed APPs at a single tertiary academic medical center. A previously validated Likert scale survey of clinician knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with ACP was adapted to include demographic information and details about practice experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 88 APPs who were sent our surveys, 46 (52%) responded. Eighty-eight percent of respondents believed APPs play an important role in ACP discussions, 80% believed that ACP information was helpful in guiding clinical care discussions, 71% expressed comfort with discussing ACP with patients, and 59% endorsed comfort with communicating a prognosis to patients. Twelve interviews yielded 3 main themes: (1) clinical and professional benefits of ACP; (2) barriers to APP involvement in ACP; (3) proposed interventions to integrate APPs into ACP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To increase surgical ACP uptake by APPs, data on proposed ACP interventions must focus on establishing a multi-disciplinary team-based workflow, addressing competing clinical demands, opportunities for additional education, and clarifying the scope of work.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 1","pages":"e506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Advanced practice providers (APPs) are essential members of surgical teams. We sought to understand the barriers and facilitators they perceive when participating in advanced care planning (ACP) discussions with patients and use this knowledge to design strategies to promote interprofessional ACP uptake for surgical services and potentially extend ACP discussions and documentation to more patients.

Background: ACP has been challenging to integrate into surgical practice despite being endorsed by national societies and payors as an essential aspect of caring for older adults.

Methods: Using qualitative and quantitative methods, we surveyed and interviewed APPs at a single tertiary academic medical center. A previously validated Likert scale survey of clinician knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with ACP was adapted to include demographic information and details about practice experience.

Results: Of the 88 APPs who were sent our surveys, 46 (52%) responded. Eighty-eight percent of respondents believed APPs play an important role in ACP discussions, 80% believed that ACP information was helpful in guiding clinical care discussions, 71% expressed comfort with discussing ACP with patients, and 59% endorsed comfort with communicating a prognosis to patients. Twelve interviews yielded 3 main themes: (1) clinical and professional benefits of ACP; (2) barriers to APP involvement in ACP; (3) proposed interventions to integrate APPs into ACP.

Conclusions: To increase surgical ACP uptake by APPs, data on proposed ACP interventions must focus on establishing a multi-disciplinary team-based workflow, addressing competing clinical demands, opportunities for additional education, and clarifying the scope of work.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用先进的实践提供者的观点来设计策略,以增加参与手术患者的提前护理计划。
目的:高级执业医师(app)是外科团队的重要成员。我们试图了解他们在与患者进行高级护理计划(ACP)讨论时所感受到的障碍和促进因素,并利用这些知识设计策略,以促进外科服务中跨专业ACP的采用,并有可能将ACP讨论和记录扩展到更多的患者。背景:尽管ACP已被国家协会和付款人认可为老年人护理的重要方面,但将其纳入外科实践仍具有挑战性。方法:采用定性和定量相结合的方法,对某三级学术医疗中心的app进行调查和访谈。一个以前验证的临床医生的知识,态度和经验的李克特量表调查与ACP调整,包括人口统计信息和实践经验的细节。结果:在收到我们调查的88个app中,有46个(52%)做出了回应。88%的受访者认为app在ACP讨论中发挥着重要作用,80%的受访者认为ACP信息有助于指导临床护理讨论,71%的受访者表示与患者讨论ACP时感到舒适,59%的受访者认为与患者沟通预后时感到舒适。12次访谈得出了3个主要主题:(1)ACP的临床和专业益处;(2) APP参与ACP的障碍;(3)提出app融入ACP的干预措施。结论:为了提高外科ACP的应用,建议的ACP干预措施的数据必须集中在建立一个多学科团队为基础的工作流程,解决竞争的临床需求,额外教育的机会,并明确工作范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信