The Effects of Intersphincteric Space Dissection Approaches on Low Rectal Cancer Outcomes: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.

Yiwen Zang, Bin Zhang, Xing Liu, Baoxiang Chen, Linfeng Gao, Minwei Zhou, Xiaodong Gu, Zhenyang Li, Yiming Zhou, Bo Tang, Congqing Jiang, Guoxian Guan, Jianhua Ding, Jianbin Xiang
{"title":"The Effects of Intersphincteric Space Dissection Approaches on Low Rectal Cancer Outcomes: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.","authors":"Yiwen Zang, Bin Zhang, Xing Liu, Baoxiang Chen, Linfeng Gao, Minwei Zhou, Xiaodong Gu, Zhenyang Li, Yiming Zhou, Bo Tang, Congqing Jiang, Guoxian Guan, Jianhua Ding, Jianbin Xiang","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of 2 intersphincteric space (ISS) dissection approaches for intersphincteric resection (ISR) on perioperative safety, oncological prognosis, and anal function.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The dissection of ISS is a crucial aspect of ISR, yet the outcomes associated with various ISS dissection approaches remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from 314 patients with rectal cancer who underwent ISR at 5 Chinese tertiary referral medical institutions from January 2015 to December 2020. ISS dissection was performed using 1 of the 2 avenues: the complete transabdominal approach (CTA) and the transabdominal-perineal transanal approach (TPTA). The primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. The secondary endpoints were postoperative anal function assessed by questionnaires. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to match the clinicopathological characteristics of patients from both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 140 patients were successfully matched in the CTA and TPTA groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of perioperative complication rates, 3-year OS/DFS, and Wexner incontinence scores within 3 years after ileostomy reversal surgery (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the CTA group demonstrated less surgical time and superior low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores compared with the TPTA group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Similar outcomes were observed after conducting IPTW adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CTA and TPTA showed similar efficacy regarding perioperative safety and oncological outcomes. However, the CTA approach demonstrated a clear superiority in the LARS score.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 1","pages":"e550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of 2 intersphincteric space (ISS) dissection approaches for intersphincteric resection (ISR) on perioperative safety, oncological prognosis, and anal function.

Background: The dissection of ISS is a crucial aspect of ISR, yet the outcomes associated with various ISS dissection approaches remain uncertain.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 314 patients with rectal cancer who underwent ISR at 5 Chinese tertiary referral medical institutions from January 2015 to December 2020. ISS dissection was performed using 1 of the 2 avenues: the complete transabdominal approach (CTA) and the transabdominal-perineal transanal approach (TPTA). The primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. The secondary endpoints were postoperative anal function assessed by questionnaires. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to match the clinicopathological characteristics of patients from both cohorts.

Results: After PSM, 140 patients were successfully matched in the CTA and TPTA groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of perioperative complication rates, 3-year OS/DFS, and Wexner incontinence scores within 3 years after ileostomy reversal surgery (P > 0.05). However, the CTA group demonstrated less surgical time and superior low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores compared with the TPTA group (P < 0.05). Similar outcomes were observed after conducting IPTW adjustment.

Conclusions: CTA and TPTA showed similar efficacy regarding perioperative safety and oncological outcomes. However, the CTA approach demonstrated a clear superiority in the LARS score.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

括约肌间隙清扫入路对低位直肠癌预后的影响:中国一项多中心回顾性研究。
目的:评价2种括约肌间隙(ISS)清扫入路行括约肌间隙切除术(ISR)对围手术期安全性、肿瘤预后及肛门功能的影响。背景:ISS的解剖是ISR的一个重要方面,然而与各种ISS解剖方法相关的结果仍然不确定。方法:回顾性收集2015年1月至2020年12月在国内5家三级转诊医疗机构行ISR治疗的314例直肠癌患者的资料。ISS解剖采用两种途径中的一种:完全经腹入路(CTA)和经腹会阴经肛门入路(TPTA)。主要终点是3年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。次要终点是通过问卷评估术后肛门功能。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来匹配两组患者的临床病理特征。结果:经PSM治疗后,CTA组和TPTA组共140例患者成功配型。两组患者围手术期并发症发生率、3年OS/DFS、回肠造口逆转术后3年内Wexner失禁评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。然而,与TPTA组相比,CTA组的手术时间更短,低前切除术综合征(LARS)评分更高(P < 0.05)。在进行IPTW调整后观察到类似的结果。结论:CTA和TPTA在围手术期安全性和肿瘤预后方面具有相似的疗效。然而,CTA方法在LARS评分中显示出明显的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信