Surgeons' Perspectives on Liability for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the United States and European Union: Results From a Focus Group Study.

Mindy Duffourc, Mathias Møllebæk, Louise C Druedahl, Timo Minssen, Sara Gerke
{"title":"Surgeons' Perspectives on Liability for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the United States and European Union: Results From a Focus Group Study.","authors":"Mindy Duffourc, Mathias Møllebæk, Louise C Druedahl, Timo Minssen, Sara Gerke","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine surgeons' perspectives on liability for using artificial intelligence (AI)-driven technologies in surgery in the United States and the European Union.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of AI-driven technologies in surgery can improve surgical performance and patient outcomes. However, liability risks might inhibit their implementation in the operating room. We report here the results of a focus group study that explored surgeons' perspectives on liability for using AI-driven technologies in surgery in the United States and the European Union.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were identified through a call for participation disseminated through personal and professional networks. Inclusion criteria were: (1) adults (at least 18 years of age); (2) surgeons based in either the United States or in one of the European Union's Member States, with a preference for those specializing in gastrointestinal surgery to facilitate better discussions about the vignettes that involved a colorectal surgical procedure; (3) ability to comfortably read and communicate in English; (4) willingness to consent to participation, and (5) willingness to consent to keeping the focus group meeting content, participants, and discussions confidential.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 6 focus groups via Zoom with a total of 18 participants (11 EU surgeons and 7 US surgeons). The following main themes emerged: (1) acknowledgment of the potential benefits of using AI-driven technology in surgery, (2) acceptance of surgeon responsibility, (3) recognition that AI may impact the standard of care, (4) skepticism about potential liability for AI manufacturers, and (5) the importance of patient information and consent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the potential future benefits of integrating AI into surgical practice, surgeons will benefit from (1) an increased understanding of how AI-driven technologies will deliver these benefits and (2) increased clarity surrounding how AI-driven technologies will be governed by both regulators and the surgical community. While our study focused on surgeons' perspectives, it could also provide valuable insights for other healthcare providers using AI to treat patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 1","pages":"e542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine surgeons' perspectives on liability for using artificial intelligence (AI)-driven technologies in surgery in the United States and the European Union.

Background: The introduction of AI-driven technologies in surgery can improve surgical performance and patient outcomes. However, liability risks might inhibit their implementation in the operating room. We report here the results of a focus group study that explored surgeons' perspectives on liability for using AI-driven technologies in surgery in the United States and the European Union.

Methods: Participants were identified through a call for participation disseminated through personal and professional networks. Inclusion criteria were: (1) adults (at least 18 years of age); (2) surgeons based in either the United States or in one of the European Union's Member States, with a preference for those specializing in gastrointestinal surgery to facilitate better discussions about the vignettes that involved a colorectal surgical procedure; (3) ability to comfortably read and communicate in English; (4) willingness to consent to participation, and (5) willingness to consent to keeping the focus group meeting content, participants, and discussions confidential.

Results: We conducted 6 focus groups via Zoom with a total of 18 participants (11 EU surgeons and 7 US surgeons). The following main themes emerged: (1) acknowledgment of the potential benefits of using AI-driven technology in surgery, (2) acceptance of surgeon responsibility, (3) recognition that AI may impact the standard of care, (4) skepticism about potential liability for AI manufacturers, and (5) the importance of patient information and consent.

Conclusions: Despite the potential future benefits of integrating AI into surgical practice, surgeons will benefit from (1) an increased understanding of how AI-driven technologies will deliver these benefits and (2) increased clarity surrounding how AI-driven technologies will be governed by both regulators and the surgical community. While our study focused on surgeons' perspectives, it could also provide valuable insights for other healthcare providers using AI to treat patients.

外科医生对美国和欧盟使用人工智能技术的责任的看法:焦点小组研究的结果。
目的:研究美国和欧盟外科医生对在外科手术中使用人工智能(AI)驱动技术的责任看法。背景:在外科手术中引入人工智能驱动技术可以提高手术效果和患者预后。然而,责任风险可能会阻碍其在手术室的实施。我们在此报告一项焦点小组研究的结果,该研究探讨了美国和欧盟外科医生对在手术中使用人工智能驱动技术的责任的看法。方法:通过个人和专业网络传播的参与呼吁来确定参与者。纳入标准为:(1)成人(18岁以上);(2)美国或欧盟成员国的外科医生,优先考虑专门从事胃肠道手术的外科医生,以便更好地讨论涉及结肠直肠手术的小插曲;(3)具有良好的英语阅读和交流能力;(4)同意参与;(5)同意对焦点小组会议内容、参与者和讨论内容保密。结果:我们通过Zoom进行了6个焦点小组,共有18名参与者(11名欧盟外科医生和7名美国外科医生)。出现了以下主要主题:(1)承认在手术中使用人工智能驱动技术的潜在好处;(2)接受外科医生的责任;(3)认识到人工智能可能会影响护理标准;(4)对人工智能制造商潜在责任的怀疑;(5)患者信息和同意的重要性。结论:尽管将人工智能整合到外科实践中有潜在的未来好处,但外科医生将受益于(1)对人工智能驱动技术如何带来这些好处的更多理解,以及(2)对监管机构和外科社区如何管理人工智能驱动技术的更清晰的了解。虽然我们的研究侧重于外科医生的观点,但它也可以为其他使用人工智能治疗患者的医疗服务提供者提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信