Not Only Caseload but Also Patient Selection Is Predictive of Mortality After Pancreatic Resection.

Rene Mantke, Barbara Seliger, Shuji Ogino, Markus W Büchler, Richard Hunger
{"title":"Not Only Caseload but Also Patient Selection Is Predictive of Mortality After Pancreatic Resection.","authors":"Rene Mantke, Barbara Seliger, Shuji Ogino, Markus W Büchler, Richard Hunger","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Centralization of pancreatic surgery in high-volume centers is regarded as a key strategy in improving the outcome quality. However, the specific factors, in addition to higher case volumes, that influence inhospital mortality remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, the German nationwide diagnostic-related groups statistics were analyzed for 86,073 patients with pancreatic resections. Hospitals performing at least 50 resections per year were identified as high-volume pancreatic centers (HVPCs). Statistical analyses compared crude and adjusted estimates of inhospital mortality for patients treated in HVPCs and non-HVPCs. A generalized mixed model was used for risk adjustment, considering various factors such as age group, sex, diagnosis, and comorbidities (ClinicalTrail.gov, NCT06390891).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24.2% (n = 20,798) of all pancreatic resections were performed in 23 HVPCs. The crude inhospital mortality for all patients undergoing resection was 9.0%. Crude inhospital mortality in HVPCs was 5.5% compared with 10.1% in non-HVPCs (<i>P</i> < 0.001). HVPCs performed more complex resections including more concomitant procedures. On the other hand, HVPCs treated younger patients and patients with less complicated comorbidities. Statistical adjustment of comorbidities and patient characteristics resulted in a significant increase of inhospital mortality from 5.5% to 8.7% in HVPCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HVPCs have significantly lower inhospital mortality than the other hospitals. Nevertheless, the superior quality of outcome can be attributed not only to the enhanced expertise of the centers but also, at least in part, to a healthier patient population on average. However, the extent to which this patient selection is due to active selection by the practitioners or other causes remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 1","pages":"e536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Centralization of pancreatic surgery in high-volume centers is regarded as a key strategy in improving the outcome quality. However, the specific factors, in addition to higher case volumes, that influence inhospital mortality remain unclear.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, the German nationwide diagnostic-related groups statistics were analyzed for 86,073 patients with pancreatic resections. Hospitals performing at least 50 resections per year were identified as high-volume pancreatic centers (HVPCs). Statistical analyses compared crude and adjusted estimates of inhospital mortality for patients treated in HVPCs and non-HVPCs. A generalized mixed model was used for risk adjustment, considering various factors such as age group, sex, diagnosis, and comorbidities (ClinicalTrail.gov, NCT06390891).

Results: A total of 24.2% (n = 20,798) of all pancreatic resections were performed in 23 HVPCs. The crude inhospital mortality for all patients undergoing resection was 9.0%. Crude inhospital mortality in HVPCs was 5.5% compared with 10.1% in non-HVPCs (P < 0.001). HVPCs performed more complex resections including more concomitant procedures. On the other hand, HVPCs treated younger patients and patients with less complicated comorbidities. Statistical adjustment of comorbidities and patient characteristics resulted in a significant increase of inhospital mortality from 5.5% to 8.7% in HVPCs.

Conclusions: HVPCs have significantly lower inhospital mortality than the other hospitals. Nevertheless, the superior quality of outcome can be attributed not only to the enhanced expertise of the centers but also, at least in part, to a healthier patient population on average. However, the extent to which this patient selection is due to active selection by the practitioners or other causes remains unclear.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不仅病例数量,而且患者选择可以预测胰腺切除术后的死亡率。
背景:胰腺手术在大容量中心的集中化被认为是提高预后质量的关键策略。然而,除了较高的病例数量外,影响住院死亡率的具体因素仍不清楚。方法:回顾性观察分析德国86073例胰腺切除术患者的诊断相关组数据。每年进行至少50例手术的医院被确定为大容量胰腺中心(HVPCs)。统计分析比较了在HVPCs和非HVPCs中治疗的患者的粗估计和调整后的住院死亡率。考虑到年龄、性别、诊断和合并症等多种因素,采用广义混合模型进行风险调整(ClinicalTrail.gov, NCT06390891)。结果:23例HVPCs共进行了24.2% (n = 20,798)的胰腺切除术。所有手术患者的住院死亡率为9.0%。HVPCs患者的粗住院死亡率为5.5%,而非HVPCs患者为10.1% (P < 0.001)。HVPCs进行了更复杂的切除,包括更多的伴随手术。另一方面,HVPCs治疗年轻患者和并发症较少的患者。合并症和患者特征的统计调整导致HVPCs的住院死亡率从5.5%显著增加到8.7%。结论:hvcs的住院死亡率明显低于其他医院。尽管如此,高质量的结果不仅可以归因于中心专业知识的提高,而且至少部分归因于平均而言更健康的患者群体。然而,这种患者的选择在多大程度上是由于医生的主动选择或其他原因仍不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信