It's Time to Stop Excluding Early Pregnancy (Losses).

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Miranda Aalderink
{"title":"It's Time to Stop Excluding Early Pregnancy (Losses).","authors":"Miranda Aalderink","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current guidelines for the care of recurrent pregnancy loss patients in New Zealand typically limit the definition to clinical pregnancies. This approach is not supported by the available evidence, which shows that very early losses are just as prognostically important as clinical losses. Clinical pregnancy is a biologically meaningless construct and is not a suitable method for determining whether a loss is 'valid' or not. The exclusion extends to clinical trials, where treatment is often not initiated until clinical pregnancy has been established. Treatment opportunities are being missed as a result. This exclusion of early pregnancy needs to stop.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current guidelines for the care of recurrent pregnancy loss patients in New Zealand typically limit the definition to clinical pregnancies. This approach is not supported by the available evidence, which shows that very early losses are just as prognostically important as clinical losses. Clinical pregnancy is a biologically meaningless construct and is not a suitable method for determining whether a loss is 'valid' or not. The exclusion extends to clinical trials, where treatment is often not initiated until clinical pregnancy has been established. Treatment opportunities are being missed as a result. This exclusion of early pregnancy needs to stop.

是时候停止将早孕排除在外了。
目前的指导方针护理复发性妊娠丢失患者在新西兰通常限制定义为临床妊娠。这种方法没有得到现有证据的支持,这些证据表明,非常早期的损失与临床损失一样重要。临床妊娠在生物学上是一种毫无意义的构造,并不是确定流产是否“有效”的合适方法。这种排除也适用于临床试验,在临床试验中,治疗通常在确定临床妊娠后才开始。因此,错失了治疗机会。这种排斥早孕的做法需要停止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信