{"title":"Impact of Sensitive Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring on CT Scan Intervals During Postoperative Colorectal Cancer Surveillance.","authors":"Tomoko Sasaki, Takeshi Iwaya, Mizunori Yaegashi, Masashi Idogawa, Hayato Hiraki, Masakazu Abe, Yuka Koizumi, Noriyuki Sasaki, Akiko Yashima-Abo, Ryosuke Fujisawa, Fumitaka Endo, Shoichiro Tange, Koki Otsuka, Akira Sasaki, Mari Masuda, Masashi Fujita, Hidewaki Nakagawa, Fumiaki Takahashi, Yasushi Sasaki, Takashi Tokino, Satoshi S Nishizuka","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR)-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring can allow longer intervals between computed tomography (CT) scans during postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Practical guidelines still recommend intensive postoperative surveillance of CRC using periodical CT scans and serum carcinoembryonic antigen testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The longitudinal dynamics of ctDNA for 52 patients with CRC as measured by dPCR using probes targeting 87 individual tumor-specific mutations (1-5 per patient) were compared with results from conventional (ie, clinical) surveillance using serum tumor markers and CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 382 CT procedures were carried out for the patient cohort (3.3/year per patient) and the median lead time from ctDNA relapse to clinical relapse was 182 days (range, 0-376 days). If the CT interval was annual, potential delays in the detection of clinical relapse would have occurred for 7 of the 10 patients who experienced clinical relapse (9 of 13 events), with a median delay of 164 days (range, 0-267 days). If annual CT surveillance was performed together with ctDNA monitoring, 218 (57.1%) CTs would not have been needed to detect the first clinical relapse. In addition, the ctDNA monitoring would have provided a lead time of 339 days for detection of clinical relapse (range, 42-533 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the ctDNA monitoring as part of postoperative surveillance and clinical relapse detection for patients with CRC could allow the CT interval to be lengthened.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000045114).</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 1","pages":"e549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated whether digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR)-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring can allow longer intervals between computed tomography (CT) scans during postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC).
Background: Practical guidelines still recommend intensive postoperative surveillance of CRC using periodical CT scans and serum carcinoembryonic antigen testing.
Methods: The longitudinal dynamics of ctDNA for 52 patients with CRC as measured by dPCR using probes targeting 87 individual tumor-specific mutations (1-5 per patient) were compared with results from conventional (ie, clinical) surveillance using serum tumor markers and CT.
Results: A total of 382 CT procedures were carried out for the patient cohort (3.3/year per patient) and the median lead time from ctDNA relapse to clinical relapse was 182 days (range, 0-376 days). If the CT interval was annual, potential delays in the detection of clinical relapse would have occurred for 7 of the 10 patients who experienced clinical relapse (9 of 13 events), with a median delay of 164 days (range, 0-267 days). If annual CT surveillance was performed together with ctDNA monitoring, 218 (57.1%) CTs would not have been needed to detect the first clinical relapse. In addition, the ctDNA monitoring would have provided a lead time of 339 days for detection of clinical relapse (range, 42-533 days).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the ctDNA monitoring as part of postoperative surveillance and clinical relapse detection for patients with CRC could allow the CT interval to be lengthened.
Trial registration: This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000045114).