Early Cancer Screening Impressions of African-American Breast Cancer Patients Enrolled on the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Jessica Y Aduwo, Ursula J Burnette, Louisa Onyewadume, Maya J Stephens, Kamryn J Davis, Shearwood McClelland
{"title":"Early Cancer Screening Impressions of African-American Breast Cancer Patients Enrolled on the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) Trial.","authors":"Jessica Y Aduwo, Ursula J Burnette, Louisa Onyewadume, Maya J Stephens, Kamryn J Davis, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>African-Americans have the highest cancer mortality rates and the lowest survival rates compared with other racial groups in the US. The Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) program includes a culturally sensitive survey to assess the impact of patient navigation on access to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) for African-American breast cancer patients. This study reports cancer screening impressions of participants enrolled in the ongoing NAVAH phase I clinical trial, marking a significant first in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a referral for RT from a multidisciplinary tumor board, trial-eligible patients were invited to participate in the NAVAH trial. Surveys were administered before RT to assess overall cancer screening knowledge, categorizing responses as outstanding (18 to 23 points), excellent (24 to 29 points), good (30 to 35 points), average (36 to 42 points), or below average (>43 points). Knowledge was further stratified through 3 specific criteria: early screening, prognosis, and toxicity awareness with responses categorized as excellent, good, or average for each domain. Correlations between education levels and responses were analyzed using variance analysis (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial cohort of 35 trial participants was assessed. The average cancer screening and treatment knowledge score was 27.6. Participants showed excellent understanding of early screening and prognosis and good knowledge of toxicity. There was no significant correlation between educational attainment and cancer knowledge or income levels. This ongoing phase I clinical trial highlights a relative deficiency in toxicity knowledge compared with prognosis and early screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early impressions indicate that African-American breast cancer patients have an overall excellent knowledge of cancer screening and treatment, not correlated with socioeconomic or educational status, except treatment toxicity knowledge. Future education initiatives should focus on treatment toxicity to optimize patient awareness before adjuvant breast cancer RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: African-Americans have the highest cancer mortality rates and the lowest survival rates compared with other racial groups in the US. The Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) program includes a culturally sensitive survey to assess the impact of patient navigation on access to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) for African-American breast cancer patients. This study reports cancer screening impressions of participants enrolled in the ongoing NAVAH phase I clinical trial, marking a significant first in this field.

Methods: After a referral for RT from a multidisciplinary tumor board, trial-eligible patients were invited to participate in the NAVAH trial. Surveys were administered before RT to assess overall cancer screening knowledge, categorizing responses as outstanding (18 to 23 points), excellent (24 to 29 points), good (30 to 35 points), average (36 to 42 points), or below average (>43 points). Knowledge was further stratified through 3 specific criteria: early screening, prognosis, and toxicity awareness with responses categorized as excellent, good, or average for each domain. Correlations between education levels and responses were analyzed using variance analysis (P<0.05).

Results: An initial cohort of 35 trial participants was assessed. The average cancer screening and treatment knowledge score was 27.6. Participants showed excellent understanding of early screening and prognosis and good knowledge of toxicity. There was no significant correlation between educational attainment and cancer knowledge or income levels. This ongoing phase I clinical trial highlights a relative deficiency in toxicity knowledge compared with prognosis and early screening.

Conclusions: Early impressions indicate that African-American breast cancer patients have an overall excellent knowledge of cancer screening and treatment, not correlated with socioeconomic or educational status, except treatment toxicity knowledge. Future education initiatives should focus on treatment toxicity to optimize patient awareness before adjuvant breast cancer RT.

参加导航辅助减分术(NAVAH)试验的非裔美国乳腺癌患者的早期癌症筛查印象
目的:与美国其他种族相比,非洲裔美国人的癌症死亡率最高,生存率最低。导航辅助低分割(NAVAH)项目包括一项文化敏感性调查,以评估患者导航对非裔美国乳腺癌患者接受低分割放疗(RT)的影响。该研究报告了正在进行的NAVAH I期临床试验参与者的癌症筛查印象,标志着该领域的重大首次。方法:在多学科肿瘤委员会推荐RT后,符合试验条件的患者被邀请参加NAVAH试验。在RT之前进行调查以评估整体癌症筛查知识,将反应分为优秀(18至23分),优秀(24至29分),良好(30至35分),平均(36至42分)或低于平均(bb0至43分)。知识通过3个特定标准进一步分层:早期筛查、预后和毒性意识,每个领域的反应分为优秀、良好或平均。使用方差分析分析受教育程度与反应之间的相关性(结果:对35名试验参与者的初始队列进行了评估。癌症筛查和治疗知识平均得分为27.6分。参与者表现出对早期筛查和预后的良好理解以及对毒性的良好了解。受教育程度与癌症知识或收入水平之间没有显著相关性。这项正在进行的I期临床试验强调了与预后和早期筛查相比,毒性知识的相对不足。结论:早期印象表明,非裔美国人乳腺癌患者对癌症筛查和治疗的总体知识较好,除治疗毒性知识外,与社会经济和教育状况无关。未来的教育活动应侧重于治疗毒性,以优化患者在辅助乳腺癌放疗前的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信