A Novel Method to Compute the Contact Surface Area Between an Organ and Cancer Tissue.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Alessandra Bulanti, Alessandro Carfì, Paolo Traverso, Carlo Terrone, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni
{"title":"A Novel Method to Compute the Contact Surface Area Between an Organ and Cancer Tissue.","authors":"Alessandra Bulanti, Alessandro Carfì, Paolo Traverso, Carlo Terrone, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni","doi":"10.3390/jimaging11030078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contact surface area (CSA) quantifies the interface between a tumor and an organ and is a key predictor of perioperative outcomes in kidney cancer. However, existing CSA computation methods rely on shape assumptions and manual annotation. We propose a novel approach using 3D reconstructions from computed tomography (CT) scans to provide an accurate CSA estimate. Our method includes a segmentation protocol and an algorithm that processes reconstructed meshes. We also provide an open-source implementation with a graphical user interface. Tested on synthetic data, the algorithm showed minimal error and was evaluated on data from 82 patients. We computed the CSA using both our approach and Hsieh's method, which relies on subjective CT scan measurements, in a double-blind study with two radiologists of different experience levels. We assessed the correlation between our approach and the expert radiologist's measurements, as well as the deviation of both our method and the less experienced radiologist from the expert's values. While the mean and variance of the differences between the less experienced radiologist and the expert were lower, our method exhibited a slight deviation from the expert's, demonstrating its reliability and consistency. These findings are further supported by the results obtained from synthetic data testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11030078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contact surface area (CSA) quantifies the interface between a tumor and an organ and is a key predictor of perioperative outcomes in kidney cancer. However, existing CSA computation methods rely on shape assumptions and manual annotation. We propose a novel approach using 3D reconstructions from computed tomography (CT) scans to provide an accurate CSA estimate. Our method includes a segmentation protocol and an algorithm that processes reconstructed meshes. We also provide an open-source implementation with a graphical user interface. Tested on synthetic data, the algorithm showed minimal error and was evaluated on data from 82 patients. We computed the CSA using both our approach and Hsieh's method, which relies on subjective CT scan measurements, in a double-blind study with two radiologists of different experience levels. We assessed the correlation between our approach and the expert radiologist's measurements, as well as the deviation of both our method and the less experienced radiologist from the expert's values. While the mean and variance of the differences between the less experienced radiologist and the expert were lower, our method exhibited a slight deviation from the expert's, demonstrating its reliability and consistency. These findings are further supported by the results obtained from synthetic data testing.

接触表面积(CSA)量化了肿瘤与器官之间的界面,是预测肾癌围手术期结果的关键指标。然而,现有的 CSA 计算方法依赖于形状假设和人工标注。我们提出了一种新方法,使用计算机断层扫描(CT)的三维重建来提供准确的 CSA 估计值。我们的方法包括一个分割协议和一个处理重建网格的算法。我们还提供了一个带有图形用户界面的开源实施方案。该算法在合成数据上进行了测试,误差极小,并在 82 名患者的数据上进行了评估。在一项双盲研究中,我们使用我们的方法和谢氏方法计算了 CSA,谢氏方法依赖于主观 CT 扫描测量,研究对象是两位具有不同经验水平的放射科医生。我们评估了我们的方法与放射科专家测量值之间的相关性,以及我们的方法和经验较少的放射科专家测量值与专家测量值之间的偏差。虽然经验较少的放射科医生与专家之间差异的平均值和方差都较小,但我们的方法与专家的方法略有偏差,这证明了我们方法的可靠性和一致性。合成数据测试的结果进一步证实了这些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信