Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Periarticular Injection for Pain Management after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hun Sik Cho, Bo Ra Lee, Hyuck Min Kwon, Jun Young Park, Hyeong Won Ham, Woo-Suk Lee, Kwan Kyu Park, Tae Sung Lee, Yong Seon Choi
{"title":"Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Periarticular Injection for Pain Management after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hun Sik Cho, Bo Ra Lee, Hyuck Min Kwon, Jun Young Park, Hyeong Won Ham, Woo-Suk Lee, Kwan Kyu Park, Tae Sung Lee, Yong Seon Choi","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) on postoperative pain management and surgical outcomes in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that PENG block with PMDI would exhibit superior effects on postoperative pain control after THA compared to PMDI alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From April 2022 to February 2023, 58 patients who underwent THA were randomly assigned into two groups: PENG block with PMDI group (n=29) and PMDI-only group (n=29). Primary outcomes were postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) at rest and during activity at 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications (nausea and vomiting), Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) score, length of hospital stay, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and total morphine usage after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in postoperative pain for either resting NRS or active NRS. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, RCSQ score, length of hospital stay, WOMAC index, HHS, and total morphine usage exhibited no significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups showed no significant differences in postoperative pain and clinical outcomes, indicating that the addition of PENG block to PMDI does not improve pain management after applying the posterolateral approach of THA. PMDI alone during THA would be an efficient, fast, and safe method for managing postoperative pain. This article was registered with ClinicalTrials. gov (Gov ID: NCT05320913).</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 4","pages":"233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) on postoperative pain management and surgical outcomes in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that PENG block with PMDI would exhibit superior effects on postoperative pain control after THA compared to PMDI alone.

Materials and methods: From April 2022 to February 2023, 58 patients who underwent THA were randomly assigned into two groups: PENG block with PMDI group (n=29) and PMDI-only group (n=29). Primary outcomes were postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) at rest and during activity at 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications (nausea and vomiting), Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) score, length of hospital stay, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and total morphine usage after surgery.

Results: There was no significant difference in postoperative pain for either resting NRS or active NRS. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, RCSQ score, length of hospital stay, WOMAC index, HHS, and total morphine usage exhibited no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion: Both groups showed no significant differences in postoperative pain and clinical outcomes, indicating that the addition of PENG block to PMDI does not improve pain management after applying the posterolateral approach of THA. PMDI alone during THA would be an efficient, fast, and safe method for managing postoperative pain. This article was registered with ClinicalTrials. gov (Gov ID: NCT05320913).

全髋关节置换术后关节周围注射包膜神经阻滞治疗疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究的目的是比较关节周围多模态药物注射(PMDI)与包膜神经阻滞(PENG)对全髋关节置换术(THA)患者术后疼痛管理和手术结果的有效性。我们假设与单独PMDI相比,彭阻滞与PMDI在THA术后疼痛控制方面表现出更好的效果。材料与方法:从2022年4月至2023年2月,58例THA患者随机分为两组:彭阻滞PMDI组(n=29)和仅PMDI组(n=29)。主要结果是术后6、24和48小时休息和活动时的术后数字评定量表(NRS)。次要结局为术后并发症(恶心和呕吐)、Richards-Campbell睡眠问卷(RCSQ)评分、住院时间、西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎(WOMAC)指数、Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和术后吗啡总使用量。结果:静息NRS组与活动NRS组术后疼痛无显著差异。术后恶心呕吐、RCSQ评分、住院时间、WOMAC指数、HHS、吗啡总用量两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:两组术后疼痛和临床结果无显著差异,表明PMDI中添加PENG阻滞并不能改善THA后外侧入路后的疼痛管理。人工髋关节置换术中单独使用PMDI是一种有效、快速、安全的治疗术后疼痛的方法。本文已在ClinicalTrials注册。gov (gov ID: NCT05320913)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信