[A multicenter retrospective clinical study of a simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment system in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].

Q3 Medicine
J Y Leng, Y H Cai, X P Ge, N P Zhao, Q Q Su, Z X Jia, J Qian, B Z Li, H Y Hua, X Z Lu, H Y Zhu, J Y Li, W Y Shi
{"title":"[A multicenter retrospective clinical study of a simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment system in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].","authors":"J Y Leng, Y H Cai, X P Ge, N P Zhao, Q Q Su, Z X Jia, J Qian, B Z Li, H Y Hua, X Z Lu, H Y Zhu, J Y Li, W Y Shi","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20241121-00467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the predictive value of simplified geriatric assessment (sGA) in elderly Chinese patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) . <b>Methods:</b> It retrospectively analyzed the relationships of sGA with the clinical characteristics, outcome, and prognosis of 219 patients aged ≥60 years who were newly diagnosed with DLBCL at six hospitals in Jiangsu province between January 2018 and December 2022. <b>Results:</b> The median age of 219 patients was 68 years (60-87 years). According to the sGA system criteria, 101 (46.1%), 103 (47.0%), and 15 (6.8%) elderly patients with DLBCL were categorized as fit, unfit, and frail, respectively. The most common adverse reactions after chemotherapy were hematologic, and the incidence of grade >2 hematologic adverse reactions was similar among the three groups (47.5% <i>vs</i> 41.7% <i>vs</i> 46.7%, respectively; <i>χ</i>(2)=0.712, <i>P</i>=0.700). Compared with the fit and unfit groups, the frail group showed tendencies toward for higher proportions of grade >2 gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and infectious adverse reactions (<i>P</i>>0.05 for all). The fit, unfit, and frail groups had respective remission rates of 74.3%, 46.6%, and 20.0% (<i>χ</i>(2)=25.249, <i>P</i><0.001) ; disease progression rates of 5.9%, 11.7%, and 26.7% (<i>χ</i>(2)=6.763, <i>P</i><0.05) ; 2-year overall survival rates of 92.1% (95% <i>CI</i> 86.6% to 97.9%), 77.6% (95% <i>CI</i> 69.5% to 86.6%), and 70.1% (95% <i>CI</i> 49.4% to 99.6%) (<i>P</i><0.05) ; and 2-year progression-free survival rates of 76.8% (95% <i>CI</i> 67.0% to 84.8%), 69.7% (95% <i>CI</i> 61.8% to 82.0%), and 65.7% (95% <i>CI</i> 53.3% to 100%) (<i>P</i>=0.399) . <b>Conclusion:</b> sGA can effectively predict treatment adverse effects and efficacy, disease progression, and long-term survival in elderly DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":24016,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","volume":"46 2","pages":"126-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20241121-00467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of simplified geriatric assessment (sGA) in elderly Chinese patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) . Methods: It retrospectively analyzed the relationships of sGA with the clinical characteristics, outcome, and prognosis of 219 patients aged ≥60 years who were newly diagnosed with DLBCL at six hospitals in Jiangsu province between January 2018 and December 2022. Results: The median age of 219 patients was 68 years (60-87 years). According to the sGA system criteria, 101 (46.1%), 103 (47.0%), and 15 (6.8%) elderly patients with DLBCL were categorized as fit, unfit, and frail, respectively. The most common adverse reactions after chemotherapy were hematologic, and the incidence of grade >2 hematologic adverse reactions was similar among the three groups (47.5% vs 41.7% vs 46.7%, respectively; χ(2)=0.712, P=0.700). Compared with the fit and unfit groups, the frail group showed tendencies toward for higher proportions of grade >2 gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and infectious adverse reactions (P>0.05 for all). The fit, unfit, and frail groups had respective remission rates of 74.3%, 46.6%, and 20.0% (χ(2)=25.249, P<0.001) ; disease progression rates of 5.9%, 11.7%, and 26.7% (χ(2)=6.763, P<0.05) ; 2-year overall survival rates of 92.1% (95% CI 86.6% to 97.9%), 77.6% (95% CI 69.5% to 86.6%), and 70.1% (95% CI 49.4% to 99.6%) (P<0.05) ; and 2-year progression-free survival rates of 76.8% (95% CI 67.0% to 84.8%), 69.7% (95% CI 61.8% to 82.0%), and 65.7% (95% CI 53.3% to 100%) (P=0.399) . Conclusion: sGA can effectively predict treatment adverse effects and efficacy, disease progression, and long-term survival in elderly DLBCL.

[一种简化的老年弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤患者老年综合评估系统的多中心回顾性临床研究]。
目的:探讨简化老年评估(sGA)对中国老年弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年12月江苏省6家医院219例年龄≥60岁新诊断的DLBCL患者sGA与临床特征、结局及预后的关系。结果:219例患者中位年龄为68岁(60-87岁)。根据sGA系统标准,101例(46.1%)、103例(47.0%)和15例(6.8%)老年DLBCL患者分别被分类为健康、不健康和虚弱。化疗后最常见的不良反应是血液学,三组患者>2级血液学不良反应发生率相似(分别为47.5% vs 41.7% vs 46.7%;χ(2)= 0.712,P = 0.700)。与健康组和不健康组相比,体弱组出现>2级胃肠道、肺部和感染性不良反应的比例有较高的趋势(P < 0.05)。适合组、不适合组和虚弱组的缓解率分别为74.3%、46.6%和20.0% (χ(2)=25.249, Pχ(2)=6.763, PCI 86.6% ~ 97.9%)、77.6% (95% CI 69.5% ~ 86.6%)和70.1% (95% CI 49.4% ~ 99.6%) (PCI 67.0% ~ 84.8%)、69.7% (95% CI 61.8% ~ 82.0%)和65.7% (95% CI 53.3% ~ 100%) (P=0.399)。结论:sGA可有效预测老年DLBCL治疗不良反应、疗效、病情进展及长期生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信