Detection of hypovolaemia by the Hypotension Prediction Index is associated with gastrointestinal microcirculation dysfunction in a porcine model of haemorrhage.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002578
Simon Davies, Zhongping Jian, Feras Hatib, Amy Gomes, Monty Mythen
{"title":"Detection of hypovolaemia by the Hypotension Prediction Index is associated with gastrointestinal microcirculation dysfunction in a porcine model of haemorrhage.","authors":"Simon Davies, Zhongping Jian, Feras Hatib, Amy Gomes, Monty Mythen","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post operative gastrointestinal dysfunction is a common complication following critical illness. The splanchnic circulation is sensitive to changes in volume status and is unduly impacted by volume loss compared to other organ systems. A raised Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) value has been associated with decreased gastrointestinal microcirculation flow in haemorrhage models at 5% volume loss. The aim of this study was to assess whether HPI can detect a 5% volume deficit and whether this is associated with a decrease in GI microvascular flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten anaesthetised, mechanically ventilated Yorkshire/Landrace cross breed pigs were studied. Haemorrhage was performed removing 1% aliquots of blood until 10% of blood volume was removed. Once complete the removed blood was reinfused in 2% aliquots. Haemodynamic and intestinal microcirculatory measurements were performed at each stage. A repeated measurement one-way ANOVA was used to compared changes from baseline measurements during haemorrhage, and the final haemorrhage stage during reinfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant change in MAP from baseline values at 3% haemorrhage with a 6.0 mmHg decrease (95% CI 0.2 to 11.8, p < 0.05) from 93(3) mmHg to 87(4) mmHg. HPI showed a significant rise from baseline values from 17(6) to 44(22) with a MD of 26.4 (95% CI 2.1 to 50.7, p < 0.005) at 5% haemorrhage. For classifying if a model was greater than 5% volume deplete the area under the curve for the analysed variables were HPI 0.97 (95% CI 0.90-0.98, p < 0.0001), SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.89, p < 0.0001), and MAP 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95, p < 0.0001). There were significant decreases in microcirculation scores comparing baseline with 1% haemorrhage (MD -1.89, 95% CI -2.49 to -1.29, P < 0.0001), 1% haemorrhage with 2% haemorrhage (MD -1.90, 95% CI -2.67 to -1.15, P < 0.0001), up to 4% haemorrhage compared with 5% (MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.31 to -0.37, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intestinal microcirculation is disrupted with minimal volume loss and is reduced by almost 75% at a blood loss of 5% volume. The reduction in gastrointestinal MFI is not captured in clinically significant changes in commonly measured parameters, however, is reflected in changes in the hypotension prediction index at 5% volume loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post operative gastrointestinal dysfunction is a common complication following critical illness. The splanchnic circulation is sensitive to changes in volume status and is unduly impacted by volume loss compared to other organ systems. A raised Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) value has been associated with decreased gastrointestinal microcirculation flow in haemorrhage models at 5% volume loss. The aim of this study was to assess whether HPI can detect a 5% volume deficit and whether this is associated with a decrease in GI microvascular flow.

Methods: Ten anaesthetised, mechanically ventilated Yorkshire/Landrace cross breed pigs were studied. Haemorrhage was performed removing 1% aliquots of blood until 10% of blood volume was removed. Once complete the removed blood was reinfused in 2% aliquots. Haemodynamic and intestinal microcirculatory measurements were performed at each stage. A repeated measurement one-way ANOVA was used to compared changes from baseline measurements during haemorrhage, and the final haemorrhage stage during reinfusion.

Results: There was a significant change in MAP from baseline values at 3% haemorrhage with a 6.0 mmHg decrease (95% CI 0.2 to 11.8, p < 0.05) from 93(3) mmHg to 87(4) mmHg. HPI showed a significant rise from baseline values from 17(6) to 44(22) with a MD of 26.4 (95% CI 2.1 to 50.7, p < 0.005) at 5% haemorrhage. For classifying if a model was greater than 5% volume deplete the area under the curve for the analysed variables were HPI 0.97 (95% CI 0.90-0.98, p < 0.0001), SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.89, p < 0.0001), and MAP 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95, p < 0.0001). There were significant decreases in microcirculation scores comparing baseline with 1% haemorrhage (MD -1.89, 95% CI -2.49 to -1.29, P < 0.0001), 1% haemorrhage with 2% haemorrhage (MD -1.90, 95% CI -2.67 to -1.15, P < 0.0001), up to 4% haemorrhage compared with 5% (MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.31 to -0.37, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Intestinal microcirculation is disrupted with minimal volume loss and is reduced by almost 75% at a blood loss of 5% volume. The reduction in gastrointestinal MFI is not captured in clinically significant changes in commonly measured parameters, however, is reflected in changes in the hypotension prediction index at 5% volume loss.

在猪出血模型中,通过低血压预测指数检测低血容量与胃肠道微循环功能障碍相关。
背景:术后胃肠功能障碍是危重症后常见的并发症。内脏循环对体积状态的变化很敏感,与其他器官系统相比,它受到体积损失的过度影响。在容量损失5%的出血模型中,低血压预测指数(HPI)值升高与胃肠道微循环流量减少有关。本研究的目的是评估HPI是否可以检测到5%的容量不足,以及这是否与胃肠道微血管流量减少有关。方法:对10头麻醉、机械通气的约克郡/长白杂交猪进行研究。取出1%等量的血液进行出血,直到取出10%的血容量。一旦完成,取出的血液以2%的等份重新输注。在每个阶段进行血流动力学和肠道微循环测量。使用重复测量单因素方差分析比较出血期间基线测量值的变化和再输注期间的最终出血阶段。结果:在3%出血时,MAP与基线值相比有显著变化,从93(3)mmHg下降6.0 mmHg (95% CI 0.2至11.8,p < 0.05)到87(4)mmHg。在5%出血时,HPI从基线值17(6)显著上升至44(22),MD为26.4 (95% CI 2.1至50.7,p < 0.005)。对于分类,如果模型大于5%,则分析变量的曲线下面积为HPI 0.97 (95% CI 0.90-0.98, p < 0.0001), SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.89, p < 0.0001)和MAP 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95, p < 0.0001)。微循环评分与1%出血组(MD -1.89, 95% CI -2.49至-1.29,P < 0.0001)、1%出血组与2%出血组(MD -1.90, 95% CI -2.67至-1.15,P < 0.0001)、4%出血组与5%出血组(MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.31至-0.37,P < 0.0001)相比显著降低。结论:肠道微循环被破坏,但体积损失很小,在失血量5%的情况下,肠道微循环减少近75%。胃肠道MFI的减少并没有体现在通常测量参数的临床显著变化中,然而,在5%体积损失时,它反映在低血压预测指数的变化中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信