Modified Stoppa's approach as "all fractures through one approach" for fractures of the acetabulum and pelvis.

Q3 Medicine
Asif Sultan, Qazi Waris Manzoor
{"title":"Modified Stoppa's approach as \"all fractures through one approach\" for fractures of the acetabulum and pelvis.","authors":"Asif Sultan, Qazi Waris Manzoor","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0055.0635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The modified Stoppa approach has gained widespread acceptance for managing acetabular fractures. This study explores its effectiveness as a comprehensive solution for a majority of acetabular, pelvic and combined injuries.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 27 patients [21 males, 6 females, mean age 45.4 years] with acetabular fractures and pelvic injury fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The modified Stoppa approach with a transverse incision was used in all cases. The brim plate was used to fix the anterior column, the infra-pectineal plate, hook plate and lag screws were used to fix the posterior column. Symphyseal and ramus fixation was done using a recon plate and the sacroiliac joint was fixed with illiosacral screws. The mean follow up was 3.21 years. The radiological and functional outcome was evaluated by Matta's criteria and the modified D'Aubigne and Postel criteria, respectively, for acetabular fractures and the Matta and Tornetta criteria and Majeed's score, respectively, for pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 24 acetabular fractures and 4 pelvic injuries (including 1 combined injury). Average blood loss and operation times were 750 mL and 140 min, respectively. Among 24 acetabular fractures, 22 had congruent reduction and 2 had non-congruent reduction. Functional outcome was excellent in 7, good in 11, fair in 4 and poor in 2 patients. Among 4 pelvic fractures, 2 had excellent and 2 had good reduction. Majeed's score was excellent in 1 and good in 2 patients (the patient with a combined injury had an excellent functional outcome).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>1. This study confirms the efficacy and safety of the modified Stoppa approach in treating anterior injuries of the acetabulum. 2. This study also underlines the possibility of managing the minimally displaced posterior column injuries and a good portion pelvic ring injuries through anterior approach. 3. The modified Stoppa approach may be considered a workhorse approach for treating a majority of acetabular fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19622,"journal":{"name":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","volume":"26 6","pages":"275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0055.0635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The modified Stoppa approach has gained widespread acceptance for managing acetabular fractures. This study explores its effectiveness as a comprehensive solution for a majority of acetabular, pelvic and combined injuries.

Material and methods: This prospective study enrolled 27 patients [21 males, 6 females, mean age 45.4 years] with acetabular fractures and pelvic injury fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The modified Stoppa approach with a transverse incision was used in all cases. The brim plate was used to fix the anterior column, the infra-pectineal plate, hook plate and lag screws were used to fix the posterior column. Symphyseal and ramus fixation was done using a recon plate and the sacroiliac joint was fixed with illiosacral screws. The mean follow up was 3.21 years. The radiological and functional outcome was evaluated by Matta's criteria and the modified D'Aubigne and Postel criteria, respectively, for acetabular fractures and the Matta and Tornetta criteria and Majeed's score, respectively, for pelvic fractures.

Results: There were 24 acetabular fractures and 4 pelvic injuries (including 1 combined injury). Average blood loss and operation times were 750 mL and 140 min, respectively. Among 24 acetabular fractures, 22 had congruent reduction and 2 had non-congruent reduction. Functional outcome was excellent in 7, good in 11, fair in 4 and poor in 2 patients. Among 4 pelvic fractures, 2 had excellent and 2 had good reduction. Majeed's score was excellent in 1 and good in 2 patients (the patient with a combined injury had an excellent functional outcome).

Conclusions: 1. This study confirms the efficacy and safety of the modified Stoppa approach in treating anterior injuries of the acetabulum. 2. This study also underlines the possibility of managing the minimally displaced posterior column injuries and a good portion pelvic ring injuries through anterior approach. 3. The modified Stoppa approach may be considered a workhorse approach for treating a majority of acetabular fractures.

改良Stoppa入路为髋臼和骨盆骨折的“所有骨折通过一个入路”。
背景:改良的Stoppa入路已被广泛接受用于治疗髋臼骨折。本研究探讨了其作为大多数髋臼、骨盆和合并损伤的综合解决方案的有效性。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究纳入27例符合入选标准的髋臼骨折和骨盆损伤患者[男性21例,女性6例,平均年龄45.4岁]。所有病例均采用改良的横向切口Stoppa入路。采用边缘钢板固定前柱,耻骨下钢板、钩钢板和拉力螺钉固定后柱。采用recon钢板进行联合和分支固定,骶髂关节用髂骶螺钉固定。平均随访时间为3.21年。对髋臼骨折分别采用Matta标准和改良的D'Aubigne和Postel标准,对骨盆骨折分别采用Matta和Tornetta标准和Majeed评分进行影像学和功能预后评估。结果:髋臼骨折24例,骨盆损伤4例(其中合并损伤1例)。平均出血量750 mL,手术时间140 min。24例髋臼骨折中,22例髋臼骨折完全复位,2例髋臼骨折不完全复位。7例功能预后为优,11例为良,4例为一般,2例为差。骨盆骨折4例,复位优良者2例,复位良好者2例。1例患者的Majeed评分为优,2例为优(合并损伤的患者功能预后良好)。结论:1。本研究证实了改良Stoppa入路治疗髋臼前路损伤的有效性和安全性。2. 本研究还强调了通过前路手术治疗轻度移位后柱损伤和大部分骨盆环损伤的可能性。3. 改良的Stoppa入路可被认为是治疗大多数髋臼骨折的主要入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja
Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信