Prospective Evaluation of Various Ultrasound Parameters for Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection Subtypes: Elasticity and Dispersion as Diagnostic Tools.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yeji Kwon, Jongjin Yoon, Dae Chul Jung, Young Taik Oh, Kyunghwa Han, Minsun Jung, Byung Chul Kang
{"title":"Prospective Evaluation of Various Ultrasound Parameters for Assessing Renal Allograft Rejection Subtypes: Elasticity and Dispersion as Diagnostic Tools.","authors":"Yeji Kwon, Jongjin Yoon, Dae Chul Jung, Young Taik Oh, Kyunghwa Han, Minsun Jung, Byung Chul Kang","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Renal allograft rejection, either acute or chronic, is prevalent among many recipients. This study aimed to identify multiple Doppler ultrasound parameters for predicting renal allograft rejection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between November 2021 and April 2022, 61 renal allograft recipients were studied prospectively after excluding two patients with dual transplants and seven with hydronephrosis. The analysis excluded 11 cases (10 due to missing Doppler data or pathology reports and one due to a high interquartile range/median dispersion value), resulting in a final analysis of 50 patients. Clinical characteristics, color Doppler imaging, superb microvascular imaging, and shear-wave imaging parameters were assessed by three experienced genitourinary radiologists. The Banff classification of the biopsy tissue served as the reference standard. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, contingency matrices, and multiple machine-learning models were employed to estimate the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty kidney transplant recipients (mean age, 53.26±8.86 years; 29 men) were evaluated. Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) demonstrated significant associations for predicting the combination of (borderline) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) categories (Banff categories 3 and 4) (<i>p</i>=0.006) and yielded equal or higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values compared to various classifiers. Dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was the only significant factor for predicting the combination of non-TCMR categories (Banff categories 2, 5, and 6) (<i>p</i>=0.026) and showed equal or higher AUC values than multiple machine learning classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) showed a significant association with the combination of (borderline) TCMR categories, whereas dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was significantly associated with the combination of non-TCMR categories in renal allografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 4","pages":"249-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Renal allograft rejection, either acute or chronic, is prevalent among many recipients. This study aimed to identify multiple Doppler ultrasound parameters for predicting renal allograft rejection.

Materials and methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, 61 renal allograft recipients were studied prospectively after excluding two patients with dual transplants and seven with hydronephrosis. The analysis excluded 11 cases (10 due to missing Doppler data or pathology reports and one due to a high interquartile range/median dispersion value), resulting in a final analysis of 50 patients. Clinical characteristics, color Doppler imaging, superb microvascular imaging, and shear-wave imaging parameters were assessed by three experienced genitourinary radiologists. The Banff classification of the biopsy tissue served as the reference standard. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, contingency matrices, and multiple machine-learning models were employed to estimate the associations.

Results: Fifty kidney transplant recipients (mean age, 53.26±8.86 years; 29 men) were evaluated. Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) demonstrated significant associations for predicting the combination of (borderline) T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) categories (Banff categories 3 and 4) (p=0.006) and yielded equal or higher area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values compared to various classifiers. Dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was the only significant factor for predicting the combination of non-TCMR categories (Banff categories 2, 5, and 6) (p=0.026) and showed equal or higher AUC values than multiple machine learning classifiers.

Conclusion: Elasticity (≤14.8 kPa) showed a significant association with the combination of (borderline) TCMR categories, whereas dispersion (>15.0 m/s/kHz) was significantly associated with the combination of non-TCMR categories in renal allografts.

评估同种异体肾移植排斥亚型的各种超声参数的前瞻性评价:弹性和弥散度作为诊断工具。
目的:同种异体肾移植排斥反应,无论是急性还是慢性,在许多受者中都很普遍。本研究旨在确定多种多普勒超声参数预测肾移植排斥反应。材料与方法:在2021年11月至2022年4月期间,对61例同种异体肾移植受者进行前瞻性研究,排除2例双肾移植患者和7例肾积水患者。该分析排除了11例(10例由于缺少多普勒数据或病理报告,1例由于高四分位数范围/中位离散值),最终分析了50例患者。临床特征、彩色多普勒成像、高超微血管成像和剪切波成像参数由三位经验丰富的泌尿生殖系统放射科医生评估。活检组织的Banff分类作为参考标准。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归、权变矩阵和多个机器学习模型来估计关联。结果:肾移植受者50例,平均年龄53.26±8.86岁;29名男性)进行评估。弹性(≤14.8 kPa)与预测(边缘性)T细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR)类别(班夫类别3和4)的组合有显著关联(p=0.006),与各种分类器相比,在接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)值下产生相等或更高的面积。离散度(>15.0 m/s/kHz)是预测非tcmr类别(Banff类别2、5和6)组合的唯一显著因素(p=0.026),其AUC值等于或高于多个机器学习分类器。结论:同种异体肾移植弹性(≤14.8 kPa)与(交界)TCMR类别组合显著相关,弥散度(>15.0 m/s/kHz)与非TCMR类别组合显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信