Consumer Engagement With Risk Information on Prescription Drug Social Media Pages: Findings From In-Depth Interviews.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jacqueline B Amoozegar, Peyton Williams, Kristen C Giombi, Courtney Richardson, Ella Shenkar, Rebecca L Watkins, Amie C O'Donoghue, Helen W Sullivan
{"title":"Consumer Engagement With Risk Information on Prescription Drug Social Media Pages: Findings From In-Depth Interviews.","authors":"Jacqueline B Amoozegar, Peyton Williams, Kristen C Giombi, Courtney Richardson, Ella Shenkar, Rebecca L Watkins, Amie C O'Donoghue, Helen W Sullivan","doi":"10.2196/67361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The volume of digital drug promotion has grown over time, and social media has become a source of information about prescription drugs for many consumers. Pharmaceutical companies currently present risk information about prescription drugs they promote in a variety of ways within and across social media platforms. There is scarce research on consumers' interactions with prescription drug promotion on social media, particularly on which features may facilitate or inhibit consumers' ability to find, review, and comprehend drug information. This is concerning because it is critical for consumers to know and weigh drug benefits and risks to be able to make informed decisions regarding medical treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to develop an understanding of the user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of social media pages and posts created by pharmaceutical companies to promote drugs and how UI or UX design features impact consumers' interactions with drug information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted in-person interviews with 54 consumers segmented into groups by device type (laptop or mobile phone), social media platform (Facebook or Instagram), and age. Interviewers asked participants to navigate to and review a series of 4 pages and 3 posts on their assigned device and platform. Interviewers encouraged participants to \"think aloud,\" as they interacted with the stimuli during a brief observation period. Following each observation period, participants were asked probing questions. An analyst reviewed video recordings of the observation periods to abstract quantitative interaction data on whether a participant clicked on or viewed risk information at each location it appeared on each page. Participants' responses were organized in a metamatrix, which we used to conduct thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observational data revealed that 59% of participants using Facebook and 70% of participants using Instagram viewed risk information in at least 1 possible location on average across all pages tested during the observation period. There was not a single location across the Facebook pages that participants commonly clicked on to view risk information. However, a video with scrolling risk information attracted more views than other features. On Instagram, at least half of the participants consistently clicked on the highlighted story with risk information across the pages. Although thematic analysis showed that most participants were able to identify the official pages and risk information for each drug, auto-scrolling text and text size posed barriers to identification and comprehensive review for some participants. Participants generally found it more difficult to identify the drugs' indications than risks. Participants using Instagram more frequently reported challenges identifying risks and indications compared to those using Facebook.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UI or UX design features can facilitate or pose barriers to users' identification, review, and comprehension of the risk information provided on prescription drugs' social media pages and posts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e67361"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The volume of digital drug promotion has grown over time, and social media has become a source of information about prescription drugs for many consumers. Pharmaceutical companies currently present risk information about prescription drugs they promote in a variety of ways within and across social media platforms. There is scarce research on consumers' interactions with prescription drug promotion on social media, particularly on which features may facilitate or inhibit consumers' ability to find, review, and comprehend drug information. This is concerning because it is critical for consumers to know and weigh drug benefits and risks to be able to make informed decisions regarding medical treatment.

Objective: We aimed to develop an understanding of the user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of social media pages and posts created by pharmaceutical companies to promote drugs and how UI or UX design features impact consumers' interactions with drug information.

Methods: We conducted in-person interviews with 54 consumers segmented into groups by device type (laptop or mobile phone), social media platform (Facebook or Instagram), and age. Interviewers asked participants to navigate to and review a series of 4 pages and 3 posts on their assigned device and platform. Interviewers encouraged participants to "think aloud," as they interacted with the stimuli during a brief observation period. Following each observation period, participants were asked probing questions. An analyst reviewed video recordings of the observation periods to abstract quantitative interaction data on whether a participant clicked on or viewed risk information at each location it appeared on each page. Participants' responses were organized in a metamatrix, which we used to conduct thematic analysis.

Results: Observational data revealed that 59% of participants using Facebook and 70% of participants using Instagram viewed risk information in at least 1 possible location on average across all pages tested during the observation period. There was not a single location across the Facebook pages that participants commonly clicked on to view risk information. However, a video with scrolling risk information attracted more views than other features. On Instagram, at least half of the participants consistently clicked on the highlighted story with risk information across the pages. Although thematic analysis showed that most participants were able to identify the official pages and risk information for each drug, auto-scrolling text and text size posed barriers to identification and comprehensive review for some participants. Participants generally found it more difficult to identify the drugs' indications than risks. Participants using Instagram more frequently reported challenges identifying risks and indications compared to those using Facebook.

Conclusions: UI or UX design features can facilitate or pose barriers to users' identification, review, and comprehension of the risk information provided on prescription drugs' social media pages and posts.

消费者参与处方药社交媒体页面上的风险信息:来自深度访谈的发现。
背景:随着时间的推移,数字药物推广的数量越来越多,社交媒体已经成为许多消费者获取处方药信息的来源。制药公司目前以各种方式在社交媒体平台上宣传处方药的风险信息。关于消费者在社交媒体上与处方药促销互动的研究很少,特别是哪些功能可能促进或抑制消费者查找、审查和理解药品信息的能力。这是令人担忧的,因为消费者了解和权衡药物的益处和风险,以便能够在知情的情况下做出医疗决定,这一点至关重要。目的:我们旨在了解制药公司为推广药物而创建的社交媒体页面和帖子的用户界面(UI)和用户体验(UX),以及UI或UX设计特征如何影响消费者与药物信息的交互。方法:我们对54名消费者进行了面对面访谈,根据设备类型(笔记本电脑或手机)、社交媒体平台(Facebook或Instagram)和年龄进行了分组。采访者要求参与者在指定的设备和平台上浏览并回顾一系列4页和3篇文章。采访者鼓励参与者在短暂的观察期间与刺激物互动时“大声思考”。在每个观察期之后,参与者被问及一些探索性的问题。一名分析师审查了观察期的视频记录,以提取定量的互动数据,了解参与者是否点击或查看了出现在每页上的每个位置的风险信息。参与者的回答被组织在一个元矩阵中,我们用它来进行主题分析。结果:观察数据显示,在观察期间的所有测试页面中,59%的Facebook参与者和70%的Instagram参与者平均至少在一个可能的位置查看了风险信息。在Facebook页面中,没有一个地方是参与者经常点击查看风险信息的。然而,一个带有滚动风险信息的视频比其他功能吸引了更多的观看次数。在Instagram上,至少有一半的参与者持续点击页面上突出显示的风险信息。虽然专题分析表明,大多数参与者能够识别每种药物的官方页面和风险信息,但自动滚动的文本和文本大小对一些参与者的识别和全面审查构成了障碍。参与者普遍发现,识别药物的适应症比识别风险更困难。与使用Facebook的参与者相比,使用Instagram的参与者更频繁地报告了识别风险和迹象的挑战。结论:UI或UX设计功能可以促进或阻碍用户识别、审查和理解处方药社交媒体页面和帖子上提供的风险信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信