Encouraging Pharmacist Referrals for Evidence-Based Statin Initiation: Two Cluster Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alexander C Fanaroff, Qian Huang, Kayla Clark, Laurie A Norton, Wendell E Kellum, Dwight Eichelberger, John C Wood, Zachary Bricker, Andrea G Dooley Wood, Greta Kemmer, Jennifer I Smith, Srinath Adusumalli, Mary E Putt, Kevin G Volpp
{"title":"Encouraging Pharmacist Referrals for Evidence-Based Statin Initiation: Two Cluster Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Alexander C Fanaroff, Qian Huang, Kayla Clark, Laurie A Norton, Wendell E Kellum, Dwight Eichelberger, John C Wood, Zachary Bricker, Andrea G Dooley Wood, Greta Kemmer, Jennifer I Smith, Srinath Adusumalli, Mary E Putt, Kevin G Volpp","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Despite statins' benefit in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events, most patients with an indication for statin therapy are not appropriately treated. Clinicians' limited time and lack of systematic efforts to address preventive care likely contribute to gaps in statin prescribing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect on statin prescribing of 2 interventions to refer appropriate patients to a pharmacist for lipid management.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>These 2 pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trials were conducted among 12 total primary care practices in a community health system. Trial 1 was a delayed-intervention design of a visit-based intervention with randomization at the clinician level in a single clinic, and trial 2 was a parallel-arm trial of an asynchronous intervention with randomization at the clinic level in 11 clinics. Patients who were assigned to a primary care clinician at a participating practice, had an indication for a high-intensity or moderate-intensity statin, and were either not prescribed a statin or prescribed an inappropriately low statin dose were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Trial 1 tested an interruptive electronic health record alert that appeared during eligible patients' visits and facilitated referral to a pharmacist, while trial 2 tested an order for pharmacist referral placed by the study team for cosignature by the primary care clinician without regard to the timing of a clinic visit.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary outcome was the proportion of patients prescribed a statin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1412 patients were enrolled in trial 1 and 1950 in trial 2. Across both trials, mean (SD) patient age was 65.6 (9.9) years, and 1485 patients (44.2%) were female. Mean (SD) baseline 10-year risk of major cardiovascular events was 17.9% (9.4). In trial 1, the interruptive alert was not associated with a significant increase in statin prescriptions compared with usual care (15.6% vs 11.6%; unadjusted absolute difference, 3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.4 to 8.3). In trial 2, semiautomated pharmacist referrals were associated with an increase in statin prescriptions by 16 percentage points compared with usual care (31.6% vs 15.2%; unadjusted absolute difference, 16.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 12.7-20.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In these 2 cluster randomized clinical trials, visit-based interruptive alerts were not associated with a significant increase in statin prescribing compared with usual care, whereas a strategy of asynchronous semiautomated referral for pharmacist comanagement was associated with a substantial increase. This strategy of asynchronous semiautomated referrals for pharmacist involvement in lipid management could be a scalable and effective approach to increasing statin prescribing for patients at high risk.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05537064.</p>","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"473-481"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Despite statins' benefit in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events, most patients with an indication for statin therapy are not appropriately treated. Clinicians' limited time and lack of systematic efforts to address preventive care likely contribute to gaps in statin prescribing.

Objective: To determine the effect on statin prescribing of 2 interventions to refer appropriate patients to a pharmacist for lipid management.

Design, setting, and participants: These 2 pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trials were conducted among 12 total primary care practices in a community health system. Trial 1 was a delayed-intervention design of a visit-based intervention with randomization at the clinician level in a single clinic, and trial 2 was a parallel-arm trial of an asynchronous intervention with randomization at the clinic level in 11 clinics. Patients who were assigned to a primary care clinician at a participating practice, had an indication for a high-intensity or moderate-intensity statin, and were either not prescribed a statin or prescribed an inappropriately low statin dose were eligible for inclusion.

Intervention: Trial 1 tested an interruptive electronic health record alert that appeared during eligible patients' visits and facilitated referral to a pharmacist, while trial 2 tested an order for pharmacist referral placed by the study team for cosignature by the primary care clinician without regard to the timing of a clinic visit.

Main outcome and measure: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients prescribed a statin.

Results: Overall, 1412 patients were enrolled in trial 1 and 1950 in trial 2. Across both trials, mean (SD) patient age was 65.6 (9.9) years, and 1485 patients (44.2%) were female. Mean (SD) baseline 10-year risk of major cardiovascular events was 17.9% (9.4). In trial 1, the interruptive alert was not associated with a significant increase in statin prescriptions compared with usual care (15.6% vs 11.6%; unadjusted absolute difference, 3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.4 to 8.3). In trial 2, semiautomated pharmacist referrals were associated with an increase in statin prescriptions by 16 percentage points compared with usual care (31.6% vs 15.2%; unadjusted absolute difference, 16.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 12.7-20.1).

Conclusions and relevance: In these 2 cluster randomized clinical trials, visit-based interruptive alerts were not associated with a significant increase in statin prescribing compared with usual care, whereas a strategy of asynchronous semiautomated referral for pharmacist comanagement was associated with a substantial increase. This strategy of asynchronous semiautomated referrals for pharmacist involvement in lipid management could be a scalable and effective approach to increasing statin prescribing for patients at high risk.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05537064.

鼓励药剂师推荐基于证据的他汀类药物起始:两组随机临床试验。
重要性:尽管他汀类药物在预防主要不良心血管事件方面有益处,但大多数有他汀类药物适应症的患者没有得到适当的治疗。临床医生有限的时间和缺乏系统的努力来解决预防保健可能导致他汀类药物处方的差距。目的:探讨两种干预措施对他汀类药物处方的影响,以推荐合适的患者到药剂师处进行血脂管理。设计、环境和参与者:这两个实用的集群随机临床试验在一个社区卫生系统的12个初级保健实践中进行。试验1是一项延迟干预设计,在单个诊所进行随机化的基于就诊的干预,试验2是一项平行试验,在11个诊所进行随机化的异步干预。在参与实践中被分配给初级保健临床医生的患者,有高强度或中等强度他汀类药物的指征,并且没有开他汀类药物或开了不适当的低剂量他汀类药物的患者符合纳入条件。干预措施:试验1测试了在符合条件的患者就诊期间出现的中断性电子健康记录警报,并促进了转介给药剂师,而试验2测试了由研究小组下达的药剂师转介命令,由初级保健临床医生共同签名,而不考虑门诊就诊的时间。主要结局和测量:主要结局是服用他汀类药物的患者比例。结果:总的来说,1412名患者入组试验1,1950名患者入组试验2。在两项试验中,平均(SD)患者年龄为65.6(9.9)岁,1485例患者(44.2%)为女性。基线10年主要心血管事件的平均(SD)风险为17.9%(9.4%)。在试验1中,与常规护理相比,中断警报与他汀类药物处方的显著增加无关(15.6% vs 11.6%;未经调整的绝对差值为3.9个百分点;95% CI, -0.4 ~ 8.3)。在试验2中,半自动药剂师推荐与常规护理相比,他汀类药物处方增加了16个百分点(31.6% vs 15.2%;未经调整的绝对差值为16.4个百分点;95% ci, 12.7-20.1)。结论和相关性:在这两组随机临床试验中,与常规护理相比,基于就诊的中断警报与他汀类药物处方的显着增加无关,而药剂师管理的异步半自动转诊策略与他汀类药物处方的显着增加有关。药剂师参与脂质管理的异步半自动转诊策略可能是一种可扩展和有效的方法,可以增加高风险患者的他汀类药物处方。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05537064。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA cardiology
JAMA cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍: JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications. Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program. Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信