Michelle Jacobson, Adrianna Klejnotowska, Ping Sun, Steven A Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos
{"title":"Endometrial thickness among BRCA mutation carriers undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy.","authors":"Michelle Jacobson, Adrianna Klejnotowska, Ping Sun, Steven A Narod, Joanne Kotsopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s10689-025-00458-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been suggested that women with a pathogenic variant (mutation) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at a higher risk of developing high-grade endometrial cancer. Furthermore, significantly higher follicular (but lower luteal) endometrial thickness, a surrogate marker for endometroid adenocarcinoma risk, has been reported for this high-risk population. Given that medications known to affect endometrial thickness (i.e., tamoxifen, oral contraceptives) are often indicated for BRCA mutation carriers, it is important to elucidate substantial differences exist in carriers. Thus, we conducted a retrospective chart review of endometrial thickness among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 who had an intact uterus and were referred to a specialized ovarian cancer clinic between 2007 and 2016. Clinical data was collected from chart review, while endometrial thickness (millimeters; mm) was abstracted from transvaginal ultrasound reports with endometrial dating and compared to published levels in the general population. In total, 114 women were identified, 73 of whom were premenopausal and 41 who were postmenopausal. Among premenopausal women, the median follicular endometrial thickness found was 7.00 mm (n = 40, range 3-13) compared to 6.8 mm (range 2.4-14) in non-carriers and the median luteal endometrial thickness was 10.85 mm (n = 30, range 5-18), compared to 9.6 mm (range 3.3-18.2) in non-carriers. Among postmenopausal women, the median menopausal endometrial thickness was 4.0 mm (n = 41, range 1-18) compared to 4.0 mm (range 1-25) in non-carrier controls. Although based on small numbers, we found no significant difference in the endometrial thickness of BRCA mutation carriers versus non-carriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-025-00458-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It has been suggested that women with a pathogenic variant (mutation) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at a higher risk of developing high-grade endometrial cancer. Furthermore, significantly higher follicular (but lower luteal) endometrial thickness, a surrogate marker for endometroid adenocarcinoma risk, has been reported for this high-risk population. Given that medications known to affect endometrial thickness (i.e., tamoxifen, oral contraceptives) are often indicated for BRCA mutation carriers, it is important to elucidate substantial differences exist in carriers. Thus, we conducted a retrospective chart review of endometrial thickness among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 who had an intact uterus and were referred to a specialized ovarian cancer clinic between 2007 and 2016. Clinical data was collected from chart review, while endometrial thickness (millimeters; mm) was abstracted from transvaginal ultrasound reports with endometrial dating and compared to published levels in the general population. In total, 114 women were identified, 73 of whom were premenopausal and 41 who were postmenopausal. Among premenopausal women, the median follicular endometrial thickness found was 7.00 mm (n = 40, range 3-13) compared to 6.8 mm (range 2.4-14) in non-carriers and the median luteal endometrial thickness was 10.85 mm (n = 30, range 5-18), compared to 9.6 mm (range 3.3-18.2) in non-carriers. Among postmenopausal women, the median menopausal endometrial thickness was 4.0 mm (n = 41, range 1-18) compared to 4.0 mm (range 1-25) in non-carrier controls. Although based on small numbers, we found no significant difference in the endometrial thickness of BRCA mutation carriers versus non-carriers.
期刊介绍:
In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers.
Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician.
The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.