{"title":"Contemporary real-world treatment in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: US, four European countries, and UK.","authors":"Peter J Goebell, Stephanie Chen, Jay Jhaveri","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2481024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To characterize contemporary global real-world metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treatment, guideline concordance, trends, and potential trend drivers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective data from the Ipsos Global Oncology Monitor database for the United States, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, and the United Kingdom were used for descriptive analysis of mHSPC patients, treating physicians, and treatment utilization. Statistical testing of differences among treatment cohorts for the final study period was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 15,662 total mHSPC patients across countries (2019-2024), the 1404 patients from the most recent and relevant study period (August 2023-January 2024) had an average age of 72-74 years, good baseline functioning, high-risk prostate cancer features, and cardiometabolic conditions as top comorbidities. Treatment mostly occurred in hospital/institutional settings and urban locales by oncologists versus urologists. Monotherapy androgen deprivation therapy (mADT) use declined while use of novel androgen receptor inhibitor (nARI) combination therapies, especially doublets, increased. Concordance between real-world and guideline-recommended treatment varied by country, ranging from 43.8% to 61.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concordance with guidelines improved globally driven by nARIs. Persistent use of mADT, a non-guideline-recommended therapy, indicates physicians' concern about the safety and trade-offs with current options. New therapies delivering greater net benefits are needed, along with education on guideline adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1377-1390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2481024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To characterize contemporary global real-world metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treatment, guideline concordance, trends, and potential trend drivers.
Materials and methods: Retrospective data from the Ipsos Global Oncology Monitor database for the United States, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, and the United Kingdom were used for descriptive analysis of mHSPC patients, treating physicians, and treatment utilization. Statistical testing of differences among treatment cohorts for the final study period was conducted.
Results: Of 15,662 total mHSPC patients across countries (2019-2024), the 1404 patients from the most recent and relevant study period (August 2023-January 2024) had an average age of 72-74 years, good baseline functioning, high-risk prostate cancer features, and cardiometabolic conditions as top comorbidities. Treatment mostly occurred in hospital/institutional settings and urban locales by oncologists versus urologists. Monotherapy androgen deprivation therapy (mADT) use declined while use of novel androgen receptor inhibitor (nARI) combination therapies, especially doublets, increased. Concordance between real-world and guideline-recommended treatment varied by country, ranging from 43.8% to 61.6%.
Conclusions: Concordance with guidelines improved globally driven by nARIs. Persistent use of mADT, a non-guideline-recommended therapy, indicates physicians' concern about the safety and trade-offs with current options. New therapies delivering greater net benefits are needed, along with education on guideline adherence.
期刊介绍:
Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community.
The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.