Comprehensive economic value evaluation of adding tislelizumab to first-line chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.
{"title":"Comprehensive economic value evaluation of adding tislelizumab to first-line chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.","authors":"Shan Zhao, Shuo Kang","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2483423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) was uncleared yet. The current analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-effective of adding tislelizumab to the first-line chemotherapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model that simulated 3-week patients transition in 10-year time horizon was established to evaluate the economic value. The clinical benefit and safety data were gathered from the RATIONALE-312 trial, model parameters were gathered from the local charges and previously published studies. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the model outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could bring additional 0.61 LYs and 0.30 QALYs with the marginal cost of $5,849.40, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $19,592.08 per additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of the model results for both intention-to-treat patients and all subgroup patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could be considered cost-effective first-line therapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone from the perspective of Chinese health-care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2483423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) was uncleared yet. The current analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-effective of adding tislelizumab to the first-line chemotherapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.
Research design and methods: A partitioned survival model that simulated 3-week patients transition in 10-year time horizon was established to evaluate the economic value. The clinical benefit and safety data were gathered from the RATIONALE-312 trial, model parameters were gathered from the local charges and previously published studies. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the model outcomes.
Results: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could bring additional 0.61 LYs and 0.30 QALYs with the marginal cost of $5,849.40, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $19,592.08 per additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of the model results for both intention-to-treat patients and all subgroup patients.
Conclusions: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could be considered cost-effective first-line therapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone from the perspective of Chinese health-care system.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.