Comprehensive economic value evaluation of adding tislelizumab to first-line chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shan Zhao, Shuo Kang
{"title":"Comprehensive economic value evaluation of adding tislelizumab to first-line chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.","authors":"Shan Zhao, Shuo Kang","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2483423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) was uncleared yet. The current analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-effective of adding tislelizumab to the first-line chemotherapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model that simulated 3-week patients transition in 10-year time horizon was established to evaluate the economic value. The clinical benefit and safety data were gathered from the RATIONALE-312 trial, model parameters were gathered from the local charges and previously published studies. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the model outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could bring additional 0.61 LYs and 0.30 QALYs with the marginal cost of $5,849.40, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $19,592.08 per additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of the model results for both intention-to-treat patients and all subgroup patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could be considered cost-effective first-line therapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone from the perspective of Chinese health-care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2483423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) was uncleared yet. The current analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-effective of adding tislelizumab to the first-line chemotherapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC from the Chinese health-care system perspective.

Research design and methods: A partitioned survival model that simulated 3-week patients transition in 10-year time horizon was established to evaluate the economic value. The clinical benefit and safety data were gathered from the RATIONALE-312 trial, model parameters were gathered from the local charges and previously published studies. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the model outcomes.

Results: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could bring additional 0.61 LYs and 0.30 QALYs with the marginal cost of $5,849.40, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $19,592.08 per additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses confirmed the robustness of the model results for both intention-to-treat patients and all subgroup patients.

Conclusions: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy could be considered cost-effective first-line therapy for patients with untreated ES-SCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone from the perspective of Chinese health-care system.

中国广泛期小细胞肺癌患者一线化疗中加入tislelizumab的综合经济价值评价
背景:tislelizumab联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的成本-效果尚未明确。当前的分析旨在从中国医疗保健系统的角度评估未经治疗的ES-SCLC患者在一线化疗中添加tislelizumab的成本效益。研究设计与方法:建立分区生存模型,模拟患者在10年时间范围内3周的过渡,以评估经济价值。临床获益和安全性数据来自RATIONALE-312试验,模型参数来自当地收费和先前发表的研究。通过敏感性分析和亚组分析来检验模型结果的稳健性。结果:Tislelizumab联合化疗可额外带来0.61 LYs和0.30 QALYs,边际成本为5,849.40美元,每额外获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs)的增量成本-效果比(ICER)为19,592.08美元。敏感性分析和亚组分析证实了模型结果对有意治疗患者和所有亚组患者的稳健性。结论:从中国卫生保健系统的角度来看,与单纯化疗相比,替利利单抗联合化疗可被认为是未经治疗的ES-SCLC患者具有成本效益的一线治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信