Carotid peak flow velocity variation as a surrogate of aortic peak flow velocity variation in a pediatric population.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Federico Cristiani, Juan Pablo Bouchacourt, Juan Riva, Pablo Motta
{"title":"Carotid peak flow velocity variation as a surrogate of aortic peak flow velocity variation in a pediatric population.","authors":"Federico Cristiani, Juan Pablo Bouchacourt, Juan Riva, Pablo Motta","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03010-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid peak velocity variation (ΔVpeak<sub>Car</sub>) is an alternative to aortic peak velocity variation (ΔVpeak<sub>Ao</sub>) and has been used in the pediatric population. Children's physiology and anatomy are heterogeneous throughout their growth. For this reason, the predictive value of ΔVpeakCar as a surrogate of ΔVpeakAo can vary at different ages. We hypothesize that the ability of ΔVpeak<sub>Car</sub> as a surrogate of ΔVpeak<sub>Ao</sub> changes throughout childhood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Analyze the concordance and the tracking ability of ΔVpeak<sub>Car</sub> and the ΔVpeak<sub>Ao</sub> at different stages of development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from 0 to 12 years were included. Three groups were defined: under 12 months (G1), between 12 and 60 months (G2), and over 60 months (G3). After anesthesia induction and mechanical ventilation, maximal and minimal aortic and carotid peak flow were measured. ΔVpeak<sub>Ao</sub> and ΔVpeak<sub>Car</sub> were calculated. Pearson test and simple linear regression were performed. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine concordance. 4-quadrant analysis was used, followed by polar analysis of the vectors, to complement the concordance analysis and determine the tracking ability of ΔVpeak<sub>Car</sub> to surrogate ΔVpeak<sub>Ao</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. 22 (32.4%) patients in G1, 21 (31.3%) in G2 and 24 (35.8%) in G3. The determination coefficient (r) between ΔVpeak<sub>Ao</sub> and ΔVpeak<sub>Car</sub> in G1 was 0.44 (p < 0.001) with a slope value of 0.61 (SE = 0.11; 95% CI:0.3-0.91). In G2, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.56 (p < 0.001) with a slope value of 0.59 (SE = 0.14; 95% CI:0.35-0.82); and in G3, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.85 (p < 0.001) with a slope value of 1.11 (SE = 0.10; 95% CI:0.91-1.31). Bland-Altman analysis showed to G1 a mean bias of -0.37 (LOA - 7.87 to 7.53), to G2 -0.07 (LOA - 7.37 to 7.23) and G3 0.55 (-3.81 to 4.91). Concordance rates were 100% in G3, 95% in G2, and 93% in G1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ΔVpeak<sub>Car</sub> showed good correlation and tracking ability with ΔVpeak<sub>Ao</sub> in schoolchildren. In younger children, it was not reliable enough.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03010-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carotid peak velocity variation (ΔVpeakCar) is an alternative to aortic peak velocity variation (ΔVpeakAo) and has been used in the pediatric population. Children's physiology and anatomy are heterogeneous throughout their growth. For this reason, the predictive value of ΔVpeakCar as a surrogate of ΔVpeakAo can vary at different ages. We hypothesize that the ability of ΔVpeakCar as a surrogate of ΔVpeakAo changes throughout childhood.

Aim: Analyze the concordance and the tracking ability of ΔVpeakCar and the ΔVpeakAo at different stages of development.

Methods: Patients from 0 to 12 years were included. Three groups were defined: under 12 months (G1), between 12 and 60 months (G2), and over 60 months (G3). After anesthesia induction and mechanical ventilation, maximal and minimal aortic and carotid peak flow were measured. ΔVpeakAo and ΔVpeakCar were calculated. Pearson test and simple linear regression were performed. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine concordance. 4-quadrant analysis was used, followed by polar analysis of the vectors, to complement the concordance analysis and determine the tracking ability of ΔVpeakCar to surrogate ΔVpeakAo.

Results: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. 22 (32.4%) patients in G1, 21 (31.3%) in G2 and 24 (35.8%) in G3. The determination coefficient (r) between ΔVpeakAo and ΔVpeakCar in G1 was 0.44 (p < 0.001) with a slope value of 0.61 (SE = 0.11; 95% CI:0.3-0.91). In G2, r2 = 0.56 (p < 0.001) with a slope value of 0.59 (SE = 0.14; 95% CI:0.35-0.82); and in G3, r2 = 0.85 (p < 0.001) with a slope value of 1.11 (SE = 0.10; 95% CI:0.91-1.31). Bland-Altman analysis showed to G1 a mean bias of -0.37 (LOA - 7.87 to 7.53), to G2 -0.07 (LOA - 7.37 to 7.23) and G3 0.55 (-3.81 to 4.91). Concordance rates were 100% in G3, 95% in G2, and 93% in G1.

Conclusions: ΔVpeakCar showed good correlation and tracking ability with ΔVpeakAo in schoolchildren. In younger children, it was not reliable enough.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信