The prognostic value of a laboratory cachexia score (LCAS) defined by LDH, CRP and albumin in patients with advanced lung cancer.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Joshua J Thompson, Nicholas MacLeod, Sarah Will, Fraser O'Rourke, Josh McGovern, Campbell Roxburgh, Joanne Edwards, Ross D Dolan, Donald C McMillan
{"title":"The prognostic value of a laboratory cachexia score (LCAS) defined by LDH, CRP and albumin in patients with advanced lung cancer.","authors":"Joshua J Thompson, Nicholas MacLeod, Sarah Will, Fraser O'Rourke, Josh McGovern, Campbell Roxburgh, Joanne Edwards, Ross D Dolan, Donald C McMillan","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13426-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic inflammation has prognostic value in cancer and is considered aetiological of cachexia by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) also has recognized prognostic value. The present study aimed to evaluate the ability of a laboratory cachexia score (LCAS) defined by LDH, CRP and albumin, to identify cachexia and predict outcome in advanced lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n = 261) with serum LDH, CRP and albumin measurement receiving palliative radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer between 2009 and 2015 were identified. Subjects were stratified by LDH and LCAS. This was compared to GRIm and LIPI, two previously described LDH based prognostic scores, which do not incorporate CRP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On follow up there were 201 deaths. LDH and LCAS were associated with 1-year survival independent of ECOG-PS, MUST, weight loss, BMI, SMI, SMD, metastases, mGPS or NLR (all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis LCAS (1.36, 1.13-1.63, p = 0.001), LIPI (1.50, 1.17-1.92, p = 0.02), metastases (1.53, 1.15-2.04, p = 0.004) and ECOG-PS (1.28, 1.04-1.57, p = 0.019) were independently associated with poorer overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LCAS appears to identify cachexia and stratify survival. This may represent a useful aetiological criterion within the GLIM framework and a more powerful prognostic tool than the phenotypic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13426-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation has prognostic value in cancer and is considered aetiological of cachexia by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) also has recognized prognostic value. The present study aimed to evaluate the ability of a laboratory cachexia score (LCAS) defined by LDH, CRP and albumin, to identify cachexia and predict outcome in advanced lung cancer.

Methods: Patients (n = 261) with serum LDH, CRP and albumin measurement receiving palliative radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer between 2009 and 2015 were identified. Subjects were stratified by LDH and LCAS. This was compared to GRIm and LIPI, two previously described LDH based prognostic scores, which do not incorporate CRP.

Results: On follow up there were 201 deaths. LDH and LCAS were associated with 1-year survival independent of ECOG-PS, MUST, weight loss, BMI, SMI, SMD, metastases, mGPS or NLR (all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis LCAS (1.36, 1.13-1.63, p = 0.001), LIPI (1.50, 1.17-1.92, p = 0.02), metastases (1.53, 1.15-2.04, p = 0.004) and ECOG-PS (1.28, 1.04-1.57, p = 0.019) were independently associated with poorer overall survival.

Conclusion: LCAS appears to identify cachexia and stratify survival. This may represent a useful aetiological criterion within the GLIM framework and a more powerful prognostic tool than the phenotypic criteria.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信