Radiomic-based approaches in the multi-metastatic setting: a quantitative review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Caryn Geady, Hemangini Patel, Jacob Peoples, Amber Simpson, Benjamin Haibe-Kains
{"title":"Radiomic-based approaches in the multi-metastatic setting: a quantitative review.","authors":"Caryn Geady, Hemangini Patel, Jacob Peoples, Amber Simpson, Benjamin Haibe-Kains","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13850-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiomics traditionally focuses on analyzing a single lesion within a patient to extract tumor characteristics, yet this process may overlook inter-lesion heterogeneity, particularly in the multi-metastatic setting. There is currently no established method for combining radiomic features in such settings, leading to diverse approaches with varying strengths and limitations. Our quantitative review aims to illuminate these methodologies, assess their replicability, and guide future research toward establishing best practices, offering insights into the challenges of multi-lesion radiomic analysis across diverse datasets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify methods for integrating data from multiple lesions in radiomic analyses. We replicated these methods using either the author's code or by reconstructing them based on the information provided in the papers. Subsequently, we applied these identified methods to three distinct datasets, each depicting a different metastatic scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared ten mathematical methods for combining radiomic features across three distinct datasets, encompassing 16,894 lesions in 3,930 patients. Performance was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model and benchmarked against univariable analysis of total tumor volume. Results varied by dataset and lesion burden, with no single method consistently outperforming others. In colorectal liver metastases (TCIA-CRLM, 494 lesions in 197 patients), averaging methods showed the highest median performance. In soft tissue sarcoma (TH CR-406/SARC021, 1255 lesions in 545 patients), concatenating radiomic features from multiple lesions exhibited the best performance. In head and neck cancers (TCIA-RADCURE, 15,145 lesions in 3188 patients), total tumor volume remained a strong predictor. These findings highlight dataset-specific influences, including tumor type and lesion burden, on the effectiveness of radiomic feature aggregation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiomic features can be effectively selected or combined to estimate patient-level outcomes in multi-metastatic patients, though the approach varies by metastatic setting. Our study fills a critical gap in radiomics research by examining the challenges of radiomic-based analysis in this setting. Through a comprehensive review and rigorous testing of different methods across diverse datasets representing unique metastatic scenarios, we provide valuable insights into effective radiomic analysis strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"538"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13850-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiomics traditionally focuses on analyzing a single lesion within a patient to extract tumor characteristics, yet this process may overlook inter-lesion heterogeneity, particularly in the multi-metastatic setting. There is currently no established method for combining radiomic features in such settings, leading to diverse approaches with varying strengths and limitations. Our quantitative review aims to illuminate these methodologies, assess their replicability, and guide future research toward establishing best practices, offering insights into the challenges of multi-lesion radiomic analysis across diverse datasets.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify methods for integrating data from multiple lesions in radiomic analyses. We replicated these methods using either the author's code or by reconstructing them based on the information provided in the papers. Subsequently, we applied these identified methods to three distinct datasets, each depicting a different metastatic scenario.

Results: We compared ten mathematical methods for combining radiomic features across three distinct datasets, encompassing 16,894 lesions in 3,930 patients. Performance was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model and benchmarked against univariable analysis of total tumor volume. Results varied by dataset and lesion burden, with no single method consistently outperforming others. In colorectal liver metastases (TCIA-CRLM, 494 lesions in 197 patients), averaging methods showed the highest median performance. In soft tissue sarcoma (TH CR-406/SARC021, 1255 lesions in 545 patients), concatenating radiomic features from multiple lesions exhibited the best performance. In head and neck cancers (TCIA-RADCURE, 15,145 lesions in 3188 patients), total tumor volume remained a strong predictor. These findings highlight dataset-specific influences, including tumor type and lesion burden, on the effectiveness of radiomic feature aggregation methods.

Conclusions: Radiomic features can be effectively selected or combined to estimate patient-level outcomes in multi-metastatic patients, though the approach varies by metastatic setting. Our study fills a critical gap in radiomics research by examining the challenges of radiomic-based analysis in this setting. Through a comprehensive review and rigorous testing of different methods across diverse datasets representing unique metastatic scenarios, we provide valuable insights into effective radiomic analysis strategies.

背景:放射组学传统上侧重于分析患者体内的单个病灶以提取肿瘤特征,但这一过程可能会忽略病灶间的异质性,尤其是在多发性转移的情况下。目前还没有一种成熟的方法可用于在这种情况下结合放射组学特征,这导致了具有不同优势和局限性的各种方法。我们的定量综述旨在阐明这些方法,评估它们的可复制性,并指导未来的研究以建立最佳实践,为跨不同数据集的多病灶放射组学分析所面临的挑战提供见解:我们进行了一次全面的文献检索,以确定在放射学分析中整合多个病灶数据的方法。我们使用作者的代码或根据论文中提供的信息重新构建了这些方法。随后,我们将这些方法应用于三个不同的数据集,每个数据集都描述了不同的转移情况:我们在三个不同的数据集上比较了十种结合放射学特征的数学方法,这些数据集涵盖了 3,930 名患者的 16,894 个病灶。我们使用 Cox 比例危险模型对其性能进行了评估,并以肿瘤总体积的单变量分析为基准。结果因数据集和病变负荷而异,没有一种方法始终优于其他方法。在结直肠肝转移(TCIA-CRLM,197 名患者的 494 个病灶)中,平均法的中位数表现最好。在软组织肉瘤(TH CR-406/SARC021,545 名患者的 1255 个病灶)中,将多个病灶的放射学特征合并在一起显示出最佳性能。在头颈部癌症(TCIA-RADCURE,3188 名患者的 15145 个病灶)中,肿瘤总体积仍然是一个强有力的预测指标。这些发现凸显了数据集的特异性影响,包括肿瘤类型和病变负荷对放射线特征聚合方法有效性的影响:结论:可以有效地选择或组合放射学特征,以估计多发性转移患者的患者水平预后,但方法因转移环境而异。我们的研究填补了放射组学研究的一个重要空白,研究了在这种情况下基于放射组学分析所面临的挑战。通过对代表独特转移情况的不同数据集的不同方法进行全面回顾和严格测试,我们为有效的放射组学分析策略提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信