Performance evaluation of structural variation detection using DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing.

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Junhua Rao, Huijuan Luo, Dan An, Xinming Liang, Lihua Peng, Fang Chen
{"title":"Performance evaluation of structural variation detection using DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing.","authors":"Junhua Rao, Huijuan Luo, Dan An, Xinming Liang, Lihua Peng, Fang Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12864-025-11494-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DNBSEQ platforms have been widely used for variation detection, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (INDELs), which is comparable to Illumina. However, the performance and even characteristics of structural variations (SVs) detection using DNBSEQ platforms are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we assessed the detection of SVs using 40 tools on eight DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing (WGS) datasets and two Illumina WGS datasets of NA12878. Our findings confirmed that the performance of SVs detection using the same tool on DNBSEQ and Illumina datasets was highly consistent, with correlations greater than 0.80 on metrics of number, size, precision and sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, we constructed a \"DNBSEQ\" SV set (4,785 SVs) from the DNBSEQ datasets and an \"Illumina\" SV set (6,797 SVs) from the Illumina datasets. We found that these two SV sets were highly consistent of SV sites and genomic characteristics, including repetitive regions, GC distribution, difficult-to-sequence regions, and gene features, indicating the robustness of our comparative analysis and highlights the value of both platforms in understanding the genomic context of SVs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study systematically analyzed and characterized germline SVs detected on WGS datasets sequenced from DNBSEQ platforms, providing a benchmark resource for further studies of SVs using DNBSEQ platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":"26 1","pages":"299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-11494-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: DNBSEQ platforms have been widely used for variation detection, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions and deletions (INDELs), which is comparable to Illumina. However, the performance and even characteristics of structural variations (SVs) detection using DNBSEQ platforms are still unclear.

Results: In this study, we assessed the detection of SVs using 40 tools on eight DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing (WGS) datasets and two Illumina WGS datasets of NA12878. Our findings confirmed that the performance of SVs detection using the same tool on DNBSEQ and Illumina datasets was highly consistent, with correlations greater than 0.80 on metrics of number, size, precision and sensitivity, respectively. Furthermore, we constructed a "DNBSEQ" SV set (4,785 SVs) from the DNBSEQ datasets and an "Illumina" SV set (6,797 SVs) from the Illumina datasets. We found that these two SV sets were highly consistent of SV sites and genomic characteristics, including repetitive regions, GC distribution, difficult-to-sequence regions, and gene features, indicating the robustness of our comparative analysis and highlights the value of both platforms in understanding the genomic context of SVs.

Conclusions: Our study systematically analyzed and characterized germline SVs detected on WGS datasets sequenced from DNBSEQ platforms, providing a benchmark resource for further studies of SVs using DNBSEQ platforms.

DNBSEQ全基因组测序检测结构变异的性能评价。
背景:DNBSEQ平台已被广泛用于变异检测,包括单核苷酸变异(SNVs)和短插入与缺失(INDELs),其性能可与Illumina媲美。然而,使用 DNBSEQ 平台检测结构变异(SVs)的性能甚至特征仍不清楚:在这项研究中,我们在 NA12878 的 8 个 DNBSEQ 全基因组测序(WGS)数据集和 2 个 Illumina WGS 数据集上评估了使用 40 种工具检测 SVs 的情况。我们的研究结果证实,在 DNBSEQ 和 Illumina 数据集上使用同一工具检测 SVs 的性能高度一致,在数量、大小、精确度和灵敏度等指标上的相关性分别大于 0.80。此外,我们还根据 DNBSEQ 数据集构建了 "DNBSEQ "SV 集(4,785 个 SV),根据 Illumina 数据集构建了 "Illumina "SV 集(6,797 个 SV)。我们发现,这两个 SV 集的 SV 位点和基因组特征(包括重复区域、GC 分布、难以测序区域和基因特征)高度一致,这表明我们的比较分析具有稳健性,并突出了这两个平台在了解 SV 的基因组背景方面的价值:我们的研究系统地分析和描述了在 DNBSEQ 平台测序的 WGS 数据集上检测到的种系 SVs,为利用 DNBSEQ 平台进一步研究 SVs 提供了基准资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信