PhysCL: Knowledge-Aware Contrastive Learning of Physiological Signal Models for Cuff-Less Blood Pressure Estimation.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Renju Liu, Jianfei Shen, Yang Gu, Yiqiang Chen, Jiling Zhang, Qingyu Wu, Chenyang Xu, Feiyi Fan
{"title":"PhysCL: Knowledge-Aware Contrastive Learning of Physiological Signal Models for Cuff-Less Blood Pressure Estimation.","authors":"Renju Liu, Jianfei Shen, Yang Gu, Yiqiang Chen, Jiling Zhang, Qingyu Wu, Chenyang Xu, Feiyi Fan","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3554495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Training deep learning models for photoplethysmography(PPG)-based cuff-less blood pressure estimation often requires a substantial amount of labeled data collected through sophisticated medical instruments, posing significant challenges in practical applications. To address this issue, we propose Physiological Knowledge-Aware Contrastive Learning (PhysCL), a novel approach designed to reduce the dependence on labeled PPG data while improving blood pressure estimation accuracy. Specifically, PhysCL tackles the semantic consistency problem in contrastive learning by introducing a knowledge-aware augmentation bank, which generates positive physiological signal pairs using knowledge-based constraints during the contrastive pair generation. Additionally, we propose a contrastive feature reconstruction method to enhance feature diversity and prevent model collapse through feature re-sampling and re-weighting. We evaluate PhysCL on data from 106 subjects across the MIMIC III, MIMIC IV, and UQVS datasets under cross-dataset validation settings, comparing it against state-of-the-art contrastive learning methods and blood pressure estimation models. PhysCL achieves an average mean absolute error of 9.5/5.9 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) across the three datasets, using only 2% labeled data combined with 98% unlabeled data for pre-training and 5 samples for personalization, which represents a 6.2%/4.3% improvement, respectively, over the current best supervised methods. The ablation study provides further convincing evidence that the unlabeled data can be utilized to improve the existing cuff-less blood pressure estimation models and shed light on unsupervised contrastive learning for physiological signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3554495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Training deep learning models for photoplethysmography(PPG)-based cuff-less blood pressure estimation often requires a substantial amount of labeled data collected through sophisticated medical instruments, posing significant challenges in practical applications. To address this issue, we propose Physiological Knowledge-Aware Contrastive Learning (PhysCL), a novel approach designed to reduce the dependence on labeled PPG data while improving blood pressure estimation accuracy. Specifically, PhysCL tackles the semantic consistency problem in contrastive learning by introducing a knowledge-aware augmentation bank, which generates positive physiological signal pairs using knowledge-based constraints during the contrastive pair generation. Additionally, we propose a contrastive feature reconstruction method to enhance feature diversity and prevent model collapse through feature re-sampling and re-weighting. We evaluate PhysCL on data from 106 subjects across the MIMIC III, MIMIC IV, and UQVS datasets under cross-dataset validation settings, comparing it against state-of-the-art contrastive learning methods and blood pressure estimation models. PhysCL achieves an average mean absolute error of 9.5/5.9 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) across the three datasets, using only 2% labeled data combined with 98% unlabeled data for pre-training and 5 samples for personalization, which represents a 6.2%/4.3% improvement, respectively, over the current best supervised methods. The ablation study provides further convincing evidence that the unlabeled data can be utilized to improve the existing cuff-less blood pressure estimation models and shed light on unsupervised contrastive learning for physiological signals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信