Ability of diastolic arterial pressure to better characterize the severity of septic shock when adjusted for heart rate and norepinephrine dose.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Antoine Goury, Zoubir Djerada, Glenn Hernandez, Eduardo Kattan, Romain Griffon, Gustavo Ospina-Tascon, Jan Bakker, Jean-Louis Teboul, Olfa Hamzaoui
{"title":"Ability of diastolic arterial pressure to better characterize the severity of septic shock when adjusted for heart rate and norepinephrine dose.","authors":"Antoine Goury, Zoubir Djerada, Glenn Hernandez, Eduardo Kattan, Romain Griffon, Gustavo Ospina-Tascon, Jan Bakker, Jean-Louis Teboul, Olfa Hamzaoui","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01454-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic shock is commonly associated with reduction in vasomotor tone, mainly due to vascular hyporesponsiveness to norepinephrine (NE). Although the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP)/heart rate (HR) ratio reflects vasomotor tone, it cannot be a reliable index of vascular responsiveness to NE (VNERi). We hypothesized that adjusting DAP/HR for the NE dose could yield a VNERi value (VNERi = DAP/(NE dose x HR)), knowledge of which can help guiding therapeutic strategies in cases of persistent hypotension despite NE (e.g., increasing NE doses vs. introducing additional vasopressors). For our hypothesis be valid, at least VNERi should demonstrate a stronger association with patient outcome than DAP, DAP/HR or mean arterial pressure (MAP)/NE dose, a global marker of NE responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK database. Hemodynamic variables and initial NE doses were recorded at the randomization time-point, within 4 h of septic shock diagnosis. NE doses were expressed in µg/kg/min (using the bitartrate NE formulation). A multivariate model was employed to compare the associations between these variables and key clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, numbers of vasopressor-free days and of renal replacement therapy (RRT)-free days up to day 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK database included 424 patients with septic shock receiving NE. The median DAP was 52 mmHg [IQR: 45-50] and the median NE dose at inclusion was 0.2 µg/kg/min [IQR: 01-0.4]. In-hospital mortality was 43%. VNERi demonstrated the strongest association with in-hospital mortality compared to DAP, DAP/HR, and MAP/NE dose, emerging as the most significant covariate in the multivariate model. Similar findings were found for the associations with numbers of vasopressor-free days and RRT-free days up to day 28. The model revealed an inverted J-shaped relationship between in-hospital mortality and VNERi, with a nadir point at 6.7, below which mortality increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients receiving NE during early septic shock, VNERi demonstrated the strongest association with outcome compared to DAP, DAP/HR, and MAP/NE dose. Due to its physiological basis and robust association with outcomes, VNERi may serve as a valuable bedside marker of the vascular responsiveness to NE. This index could potentially be integrated into decision-making of early septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01454-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Septic shock is commonly associated with reduction in vasomotor tone, mainly due to vascular hyporesponsiveness to norepinephrine (NE). Although the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP)/heart rate (HR) ratio reflects vasomotor tone, it cannot be a reliable index of vascular responsiveness to NE (VNERi). We hypothesized that adjusting DAP/HR for the NE dose could yield a VNERi value (VNERi = DAP/(NE dose x HR)), knowledge of which can help guiding therapeutic strategies in cases of persistent hypotension despite NE (e.g., increasing NE doses vs. introducing additional vasopressors). For our hypothesis be valid, at least VNERi should demonstrate a stronger association with patient outcome than DAP, DAP/HR or mean arterial pressure (MAP)/NE dose, a global marker of NE responsiveness.

Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK database. Hemodynamic variables and initial NE doses were recorded at the randomization time-point, within 4 h of septic shock diagnosis. NE doses were expressed in µg/kg/min (using the bitartrate NE formulation). A multivariate model was employed to compare the associations between these variables and key clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, numbers of vasopressor-free days and of renal replacement therapy (RRT)-free days up to day 28.

Results: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK database included 424 patients with septic shock receiving NE. The median DAP was 52 mmHg [IQR: 45-50] and the median NE dose at inclusion was 0.2 µg/kg/min [IQR: 01-0.4]. In-hospital mortality was 43%. VNERi demonstrated the strongest association with in-hospital mortality compared to DAP, DAP/HR, and MAP/NE dose, emerging as the most significant covariate in the multivariate model. Similar findings were found for the associations with numbers of vasopressor-free days and RRT-free days up to day 28. The model revealed an inverted J-shaped relationship between in-hospital mortality and VNERi, with a nadir point at 6.7, below which mortality increased.

Conclusions: In patients receiving NE during early septic shock, VNERi demonstrated the strongest association with outcome compared to DAP, DAP/HR, and MAP/NE dose. Due to its physiological basis and robust association with outcomes, VNERi may serve as a valuable bedside marker of the vascular responsiveness to NE. This index could potentially be integrated into decision-making of early septic shock.

当调整心率和去甲肾上腺素剂量时,舒张动脉压更好地表征感染性休克严重程度的能力。
背景:感染性休克通常与血管舒缩性张力降低有关,主要是由于血管对去甲肾上腺素(NE)的反应性降低。虽然舒张动脉压(DAP)/心率(HR)比值反映了血管舒缩张力,但它不能作为血管对NE反应性(VNERi)的可靠指标。我们假设,根据NE剂量调整DAP/HR可以产生VNERi值(VNERi = DAP/(NE剂量x HR)),了解VNERi值可以帮助指导尽管NE仍存在持续性低血压的治疗策略(例如,增加NE剂量vs引入额外的血管加压药物)。为了我们的假设是有效的,至少VNERi应该比DAP、DAP/HR或平均动脉压(MAP)/NE剂量(NE反应性的全球标志)与患者预后的关联更强。方法:我们对ANDROMEDA-SHOCK数据库进行事后分析。在脓毒性休克诊断后4小时内,在随机时间点记录血液动力学变量和初始NE剂量。NE剂量以µg/kg/min表示(使用双酒石酸NE制剂)。采用多变量模型比较这些变量与关键临床结果(包括住院死亡率、无血管加压剂天数和无肾替代治疗(RRT)天数至第28天)之间的关系。结果:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK数据库包括424例接受NE治疗的脓毒性休克患者。中位DAP为52 mmHg [IQR: 45-50],纳入时中位NE剂量为0.2µg/kg/min [IQR: 01-0.4]。住院死亡率为43%。与DAP、DAP/HR和MAP/NE剂量相比,VNERi与住院死亡率的相关性最强,成为多变量模型中最显著的协变量。类似的发现也被发现与无血管加压剂天数和无rrt天数的关系,直到第28天。该模型显示,住院死亡率与VNERi之间呈倒j型关系,最低点为6.7,低于6.7时死亡率上升。结论:在早期感染性休克期间接受NE治疗的患者中,与DAP、DAP/HR和MAP/NE剂量相比,VNERi与预后的相关性最强。由于其生理基础和与预后的强烈相关性,VNERi可能作为血管对NE反应性的有价值的床边标志物。该指标可作为脓毒性休克早期诊断的参考指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信