Do deferred emergency payment programmes increase use of injury care services in Cameroon? A trauma registry analysis.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fanny Nadia Dissak-Delon, Kathleen O'Connor, Mark T Yost, Kibu O Dzemo, Dennis J Zheng, Rasheedat Oke, Cindy S Umoh, Ariane S Christie, Alain Chichom Mefire, Catherine Juillard
{"title":"Do deferred emergency payment programmes increase use of injury care services in Cameroon? A trauma registry analysis.","authors":"Fanny Nadia Dissak-Delon, Kathleen O'Connor, Mark T Yost, Kibu O Dzemo, Dennis J Zheng, Rasheedat Oke, Cindy S Umoh, Ariane S Christie, Alain Chichom Mefire, Catherine Juillard","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injured patients in Cameroon face high out-of-pocket costs and care discrepancies based on ability to pay. Per government declaration, all Cameroonian hospitals instituted emergency payment deferral (EPD) programmes to mitigate financial barriers to emergency care. Doctors or nurses decide on patients' eligibility for the EPD programme. However, the impact of EPD on care patterns is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cameroon Trauma Registry (CTR) is a prospective, multisite trauma registry collecting injured patient data from four hospitals in Cameroon. Using CTR data from March 2020 to February 2022, we analysed associations between patient participation in EPD programmes and healthcare interventions using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5287 CTR patients, 58% (n=3081) were emergency payment deferral recipients (EPDR). A greater proportion of EPDR lived in urban residences (89% EPDR vs 87% non-EPDR, p=0.003). EPDR more often presented with a 'serious' or more severe estimated injury severity (70% EPDR vs 59% non-EPDR, p<0.001). Compared with non-recipients, a smaller proportion of EPD recipients, a smaller proportion of EPDR underwent recommended X-rays (48% EPDR vs 51% non-EPDR, p<0.001). However, greater percentages of EPDR received a recommended ultrasound (3% vs 1%, p<0.001) or CT scan (14% EDPR vs 10% non-EDPR, p<0.001). EPDR more often did not receive radiological tests due to inability to pay (12% vs 4%, p<0.001). Moreover, 10% of EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost while 6% of non-EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression controlling for injury severity and other demographics indicates that EPDR were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted OR=0.63, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Payment deferral programmes were associated with increased use of some imaging tests, but did not fully address the downstream financial barriers that impede health equity in Cameroon.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Injured patients in Cameroon face high out-of-pocket costs and care discrepancies based on ability to pay. Per government declaration, all Cameroonian hospitals instituted emergency payment deferral (EPD) programmes to mitigate financial barriers to emergency care. Doctors or nurses decide on patients' eligibility for the EPD programme. However, the impact of EPD on care patterns is unclear.

Methods: The Cameroon Trauma Registry (CTR) is a prospective, multisite trauma registry collecting injured patient data from four hospitals in Cameroon. Using CTR data from March 2020 to February 2022, we analysed associations between patient participation in EPD programmes and healthcare interventions using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Of 5287 CTR patients, 58% (n=3081) were emergency payment deferral recipients (EPDR). A greater proportion of EPDR lived in urban residences (89% EPDR vs 87% non-EPDR, p=0.003). EPDR more often presented with a 'serious' or more severe estimated injury severity (70% EPDR vs 59% non-EPDR, p<0.001). Compared with non-recipients, a smaller proportion of EPD recipients, a smaller proportion of EPDR underwent recommended X-rays (48% EPDR vs 51% non-EPDR, p<0.001). However, greater percentages of EPDR received a recommended ultrasound (3% vs 1%, p<0.001) or CT scan (14% EDPR vs 10% non-EDPR, p<0.001). EPDR more often did not receive radiological tests due to inability to pay (12% vs 4%, p<0.001). Moreover, 10% of EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost while 6% of non-EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression controlling for injury severity and other demographics indicates that EPDR were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted OR=0.63, p=0.001).

Conclusion: Payment deferral programmes were associated with increased use of some imaging tests, but did not fully address the downstream financial barriers that impede health equity in Cameroon.

延期紧急付款方案是否增加了喀麦隆受伤护理服务的使用?创伤登记分析。
背景:喀麦隆受伤患者面临高额自付费用和基于支付能力的护理差异。根据政府声明,喀麦隆所有医院都实行了紧急付款延期方案,以减轻紧急护理的财政障碍。医生或护士决定病人是否有资格参加环保署计划。然而,环保署对护理模式的影响尚不清楚。方法:喀麦隆创伤登记处(CTR)是一个前瞻性的、多地点的创伤登记处,收集喀麦隆四家医院的受伤患者数据。利用2020年3月至2022年2月的CTR数据,我们使用单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归分析了患者参与EPD计划与医疗干预之间的关系。结果:5287例CTR患者中,58% (n=3081)为紧急延期付款接受者(EPDR)。更大比例的EPDR居住在城市住宅(89% EPDR vs 87%非EPDR, p=0.003)。EPDR通常表现为“严重”或更严重的估计损伤严重程度(70% EPDR vs 59%非EPDR)。结论:延迟付款计划与某些影像学检查的使用增加有关,但未能完全解决阻碍喀麦隆卫生公平的下游财务障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信