Fanny Nadia Dissak-Delon, Kathleen O'Connor, Mark T Yost, Kibu O Dzemo, Dennis J Zheng, Rasheedat Oke, Cindy S Umoh, Ariane S Christie, Alain Chichom Mefire, Catherine Juillard
{"title":"Do deferred emergency payment programmes increase use of injury care services in Cameroon? A trauma registry analysis.","authors":"Fanny Nadia Dissak-Delon, Kathleen O'Connor, Mark T Yost, Kibu O Dzemo, Dennis J Zheng, Rasheedat Oke, Cindy S Umoh, Ariane S Christie, Alain Chichom Mefire, Catherine Juillard","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injured patients in Cameroon face high out-of-pocket costs and care discrepancies based on ability to pay. Per government declaration, all Cameroonian hospitals instituted emergency payment deferral (EPD) programmes to mitigate financial barriers to emergency care. Doctors or nurses decide on patients' eligibility for the EPD programme. However, the impact of EPD on care patterns is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cameroon Trauma Registry (CTR) is a prospective, multisite trauma registry collecting injured patient data from four hospitals in Cameroon. Using CTR data from March 2020 to February 2022, we analysed associations between patient participation in EPD programmes and healthcare interventions using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5287 CTR patients, 58% (n=3081) were emergency payment deferral recipients (EPDR). A greater proportion of EPDR lived in urban residences (89% EPDR vs 87% non-EPDR, p=0.003). EPDR more often presented with a 'serious' or more severe estimated injury severity (70% EPDR vs 59% non-EPDR, p<0.001). Compared with non-recipients, a smaller proportion of EPD recipients, a smaller proportion of EPDR underwent recommended X-rays (48% EPDR vs 51% non-EPDR, p<0.001). However, greater percentages of EPDR received a recommended ultrasound (3% vs 1%, p<0.001) or CT scan (14% EDPR vs 10% non-EDPR, p<0.001). EPDR more often did not receive radiological tests due to inability to pay (12% vs 4%, p<0.001). Moreover, 10% of EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost while 6% of non-EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression controlling for injury severity and other demographics indicates that EPDR were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted OR=0.63, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Payment deferral programmes were associated with increased use of some imaging tests, but did not fully address the downstream financial barriers that impede health equity in Cameroon.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Injured patients in Cameroon face high out-of-pocket costs and care discrepancies based on ability to pay. Per government declaration, all Cameroonian hospitals instituted emergency payment deferral (EPD) programmes to mitigate financial barriers to emergency care. Doctors or nurses decide on patients' eligibility for the EPD programme. However, the impact of EPD on care patterns is unclear.
Methods: The Cameroon Trauma Registry (CTR) is a prospective, multisite trauma registry collecting injured patient data from four hospitals in Cameroon. Using CTR data from March 2020 to February 2022, we analysed associations between patient participation in EPD programmes and healthcare interventions using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Of 5287 CTR patients, 58% (n=3081) were emergency payment deferral recipients (EPDR). A greater proportion of EPDR lived in urban residences (89% EPDR vs 87% non-EPDR, p=0.003). EPDR more often presented with a 'serious' or more severe estimated injury severity (70% EPDR vs 59% non-EPDR, p<0.001). Compared with non-recipients, a smaller proportion of EPD recipients, a smaller proportion of EPDR underwent recommended X-rays (48% EPDR vs 51% non-EPDR, p<0.001). However, greater percentages of EPDR received a recommended ultrasound (3% vs 1%, p<0.001) or CT scan (14% EDPR vs 10% non-EDPR, p<0.001). EPDR more often did not receive radiological tests due to inability to pay (12% vs 4%, p<0.001). Moreover, 10% of EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost while 6% of non-EPDR did not undergo recommended surgery due to cost (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression controlling for injury severity and other demographics indicates that EPDR were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted OR=0.63, p=0.001).
Conclusion: Payment deferral programmes were associated with increased use of some imaging tests, but did not fully address the downstream financial barriers that impede health equity in Cameroon.
背景:喀麦隆受伤患者面临高额自付费用和基于支付能力的护理差异。根据政府声明,喀麦隆所有医院都实行了紧急付款延期方案,以减轻紧急护理的财政障碍。医生或护士决定病人是否有资格参加环保署计划。然而,环保署对护理模式的影响尚不清楚。方法:喀麦隆创伤登记处(CTR)是一个前瞻性的、多地点的创伤登记处,收集喀麦隆四家医院的受伤患者数据。利用2020年3月至2022年2月的CTR数据,我们使用单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归分析了患者参与EPD计划与医疗干预之间的关系。结果:5287例CTR患者中,58% (n=3081)为紧急延期付款接受者(EPDR)。更大比例的EPDR居住在城市住宅(89% EPDR vs 87%非EPDR, p=0.003)。EPDR通常表现为“严重”或更严重的估计损伤严重程度(70% EPDR vs 59%非EPDR)。结论:延迟付款计划与某些影像学检查的使用增加有关,但未能完全解决阻碍喀麦隆卫生公平的下游财务障碍。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.