Promoting Physical Activity Through Social Prescribing: A Narrative Review of Literature on the Mechanisms of Change

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julie Sandell Jacobsen, Rasmus Østergaard Nielsen, Nanna Holt Jessen, Halfdan Thorsø Skjerning, Sebastian Skejø, Lene Gissel Rasmussen, Dea Kejlberg Andelius, Solvej Videbæk Bueno, Per Kallestrup, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen, Knud Ryom
{"title":"Promoting Physical Activity Through Social Prescribing: A Narrative Review of Literature on the Mechanisms of Change","authors":"Julie Sandell Jacobsen,&nbsp;Rasmus Østergaard Nielsen,&nbsp;Nanna Holt Jessen,&nbsp;Halfdan Thorsø Skjerning,&nbsp;Sebastian Skejø,&nbsp;Lene Gissel Rasmussen,&nbsp;Dea Kejlberg Andelius,&nbsp;Solvej Videbæk Bueno,&nbsp;Per Kallestrup,&nbsp;Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen,&nbsp;Knud Ryom","doi":"10.1155/hsc/3898705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Social prescribing (SP) has received increasing interest in recent years due to its potential to encourage health-promoting behaviours, such as physical activity (PA). However, to develop effective SP interventions, it is critical to enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of change associated with SP and their potential to promote PA. This review aimed to synthesise the mechanisms of change in SP interventions and to develop a logic model illustrating a theoretical framework for SPs potential to promote PA.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A narrative review was performed, including a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase and PsycINFO. The systematic literature search was finalised on 21 February 2023, and studies investigating mechanisms of change in SP interventions were included. Findings were synthesised and illustrated in a logic model illustrating how SP interventions may promote PA as an outcome.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The systematic literature search identified 340 studies, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. The SP interventions comprised three processes: referral, linking and engagement. These processes influenced various mechanisms of change, which were classified into two perspectives. From a person-centred perspective, the mechanisms with the potential to promote PA comprised self-efficacy, motivation, empowerment and ‘having a voice’. These mechanisms were associated with crucial elements of SP, such as tailoring to needs, trusted relationships, nonstigmatising activities and peer-to-peer support. From a system-based perspective, the mechanisms with the potential to promote PA included system capacity and resources together with shared understanding and knowledge. These mechanisms were related to crucial elements of SP, including reliance on established communication and network, local agency and accessibility.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> A person-centred perspective describes SPs potential to promote PA through various mechanisms of change. However, these mechanisms appear to be intricately connected with the local context. Consequently, SP intervention research could benefit from incorporating contextual factors and, ideally, also integrating system thinking.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/3898705","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/3898705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social prescribing (SP) has received increasing interest in recent years due to its potential to encourage health-promoting behaviours, such as physical activity (PA). However, to develop effective SP interventions, it is critical to enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of change associated with SP and their potential to promote PA. This review aimed to synthesise the mechanisms of change in SP interventions and to develop a logic model illustrating a theoretical framework for SPs potential to promote PA.

Methods: A narrative review was performed, including a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase and PsycINFO. The systematic literature search was finalised on 21 February 2023, and studies investigating mechanisms of change in SP interventions were included. Findings were synthesised and illustrated in a logic model illustrating how SP interventions may promote PA as an outcome.

Results: The systematic literature search identified 340 studies, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. The SP interventions comprised three processes: referral, linking and engagement. These processes influenced various mechanisms of change, which were classified into two perspectives. From a person-centred perspective, the mechanisms with the potential to promote PA comprised self-efficacy, motivation, empowerment and ‘having a voice’. These mechanisms were associated with crucial elements of SP, such as tailoring to needs, trusted relationships, nonstigmatising activities and peer-to-peer support. From a system-based perspective, the mechanisms with the potential to promote PA included system capacity and resources together with shared understanding and knowledge. These mechanisms were related to crucial elements of SP, including reliance on established communication and network, local agency and accessibility.

Conclusion: A person-centred perspective describes SPs potential to promote PA through various mechanisms of change. However, these mechanisms appear to be intricately connected with the local context. Consequently, SP intervention research could benefit from incorporating contextual factors and, ideally, also integrating system thinking.

Abstract Image

背景:近年来,社会处方(Social prescribing,SP)因其鼓励促进健康行为(如体育锻炼)的潜力而受到越来越多的关注。然而,要制定有效的社会处方干预措施,我们必须进一步了解与社会处方相关的变化机制及其促进体育锻炼的潜力。本综述旨在综合 SP 干预措施的变化机制,并建立一个逻辑模型,说明 SP 促进 PA 潜力的理论框架。 方法:进行了叙述性综述,包括在 Medline、Embase 和 PsycINFO 中进行系统的文献检索。系统性文献检索于 2023 年 2 月 21 日完成,其中包括调查 SP 干预措施变化机制的研究。对研究结果进行了综合,并通过逻辑模型说明了 SP 干预如何促进 PA 这一结果。 结果:系统性文献检索确定了 340 项研究,其中 11 项符合纳入标准。SP 干预措施包括三个过程:转介、联系和参与。这些过程影响着各种变化机制,可分为两种视角。从以人为本的角度来看,有可能促进个人防护的机制包括自我效能、动机、授权和 "有发言权"。这些机制与 SP 的关键要素相关联,如根据需要、信任关系、非污名化活动和同侪支持。从基于系统的角度来看,有可能促进巴勒斯坦权力机构的机制包括系统能力和资源,以及共同的理解和知识。这些机制与战略计划的关键要素有关,包括依靠已建立的沟通和网络、地方机构和可及性。 结论:以人为本的观点描述了 SP 通过各种变革机制促进 PA 的潜力。然而,这些机制似乎与当地环境密切相关。因此,将环境因素纳入 SP 干预研究中,并在理想情况下融入系统思维,将使 SP 干预研究受益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信